No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
For some time it has been common knowledge that it is in traditional agriculture that most of the world's agricultural producers are engaged. It has also been known since FAO began publishing its annual reports on the world agricultural situation, if not before, that the rate of progress of agriculture in the advanced countries of the world differs from that in the less-developed countries. In the advanced countries, where agriculture is a minor industry in terms of the number of people engaged or in its contribution to the GNP, it has been making progress and has been producing more per person or per unit of land. In the less-developed countries, where it is a major industry, it has been registering little, if any, advance. People with experience in less-developed countries know that such increase as there has been has occurred principally in the more or less commercialized large-farm sector; and that the traditional sector, composed chiefly of small farms, has had little share in it. Considering all this, and the fact that the development of the poor countries has become of international concern, it is rather surprising that so many years have had to pass before a leading agricultural economist published a book dealing with one of the major problems of these countries: the transformation of traditional agriculture.
1 Estimates are available of the distribution of the world's lands by quality. Cf. Stamp, L. Dudley, Our Developing World (London 1960), 37–64Google Scholar. Carrying the classification one step farther to show the quality of land farmed by traditional methods should not be an insurmountable task.
2 Zoa, Jean Baptiste, “Afrikas Weg in die moderne Welt: Kulturelle und religiöse Problcme,” Europa Archiv (Bonn), XIX (May 10, 1964), 301Google Scholar.
3 Martínez, Nicolás G., La condición actual de la raza indigena en la provincia de Tunguragua, Talleres de Instituto Luis Martinez (Ambato 1916), 28Google Scholar. Cf. Sandoval, Leonidas Rodriguez, Vita Economico-Social del Indio Libre de la Sierra Ecuatoriana, Estudios en Ciencia Social, No. 32 (Washington, D.C., Catholic University of America, 1949), 33Google Scholar.
4 John T. Westbrook, “Social and Economic Factors in Individual Family Success and Failure in an Agrarian Reform Project: Caracol, Dominican Republic” (unpublished manuscript).
5 Zoa, 300.
6 Since this review article was written, another important book about subsistence agriculture has been published: Clark, Colin and Haswell, M. R., The Economics of Subsistence Agriculture (London 1964)Google Scholar. The findings of this study, whose approach is different from that of Professor Schultz, could not be taken into consideration here and would, indeed, merit separate discussion.
7 Nair, Kusum, Blossoms in the Dust: The Human Factor in Indian Development (New York 1962), 193Google Scholar.
8 Division of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, The Economic Organization of Small-scale Farming Based on Citrus, Ground Provisions and Livestock, Brokenhurst, Manchester, 1958–59 (Kingston, Jamaica, 1962), 61Google Scholar.
9 For a very illuminating discussion of these concepts and different attitudes to work and leisure, cf. Pieper, Joset, “El ocio y la existencia humana,” Humboldt (Hamburg), 1, No. 2 (1960), 46–47Google Scholar. See also Pieper, , Leisure, the Basis of Culture (New York 1964)Google Scholar.
10 Jolly, A. L., “Small-scale Farm Management Problems,” Tropical Agriculture, XXXII (April 1955), 82Google Scholar.
11 Humanismo, Misión Economía y, Estudios sobre las condiciones del desarollo de Colombia (Bogotá, Aedita Editores, Cromos, October 1958), 71–72Google Scholar.
12 Mishkin, Bernard, “The Contemporary Quechua,” in Handbook of South American Indians, ed. bySteward, Julian H. (Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution, 1947). 415Google Scholar.
13 Zoa, 301.
14 Osborne, Harold, Indians of the Andes: Aymaras and Quechuas (London, International Library of Sociology and Social Reconstruction, 1952), 210–11Google Scholar.
15 Edwards, David, An Economic Study of Small Farming in Jamaica (Kingston, Jamaica, University College of the West Indies, 1961)Google Scholar.
16 Matyas, Matolcsy, A mezögazdasági munkanélküliség Magyarorszagon [Agricultural Unemployment in Hungary], A Magyar Gazdaságkutató Intezet Különkiadványai (Budapest, Magyar Gazdaságkutató Intézet, 1936)Google Scholar.
17 Lewis, A. B., “El fomento de recursos agrícolas,” in El Desarollo Agricola y Ecóndmico de la Zona del Mantaro en el Peru (New York, International Development Services, Inc., December 1954), 1, 145Google Scholar (mimeographed).