Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:53:44.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Post-Postcommunism: Transition, Comparison, and the End of “Eastern Europe”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Charles King
Charles King
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access

Abstract

A decade after the end of European and Eurasian communism the once acrimonious debates between “area studies” and “the discipline” have largely subsided. Access to archives, survey data, and political elites has allowed east European countries to be treated as normal arenas of research. Recent work by both younger and established scholars has made serious contributions not only to the understanding of postcommunism but also to broader research questions about the political economy of reform, federalism, transitional justice, and nationalism and interethnic relations. The key issue for students of postcommunism is explaining the highly variable paths that east European and Eurasian states have taken since 1989. Compared with the relative homogeneity of outcomes in earlier transitions in southern Europe and Latin America—extrication from previous regimes followed by long periods of consolidation—the record in the east looks profoundly more varied: a handful of successful transitions and easy consolidations, several incomplete transitions, a few transitions followed by reversion to authoritarian politics, even some transitions that never really began at all. The works under review point scholars toward the study of the institutional legacies of state socialism: the “subversive institutions” of the communist state, the institutional dimensions of ethnic solidarity and mobilization, and the emerging patterns of interinstitutional bargaining in the first years of postcommunism.

Type
Review Articles
Information
World Politics , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , October 2000 , pp. 143 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the exchanges in Bates, Robert H., Johnson, Chalmers, and Lustick, Ian in “Controversy in the Discipline: Area Studies and Comparative Politics,” PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (June 1997)Google Scholar; Bates, Robert, “Theory in Comparative Politics?” APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter 8 (Winter 1997), 1–3Google Scholar; Christopher Shea, “Political Scientists Clash over the Value of Area Studies,” Chronicle ofHigher Education, January 10,1997, A13-A14.

2 See the special issue of Post-Soviet Affairs 8, no. 3 (1992)Google Scholar; Snyder, Jack, “Science and Sovietology: Bridging the Methods Gap in Soviet Foreign Policy Studies,” World Politics 40 (January 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zwick, Peter, “The Perestroika of Soviet Studies: Thinking and Teaching about the Soviet Union in Comparative Perspective,” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (September 1991)Google Scholar; Malia, Martin, “From under the Rubble, What?” Problems of Communism 41 (January-April 1992)Google Scholar; Cox, Michael, “The End of the USSR and the Collapse of Soviet Studies,” Coexistence 31 (1994)Google Scholar; King, Charles, “Post-Sovietology: Area Studies or Social Science?” International Affairs 70, no. 2 (1994), 291–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, for example, Bates, Robert H. et al. , Analytic Narratives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

4 Ross, Marc Howard, “Culture and Identity in Comparative Political Analysis,” in Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S., eds., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Lane, Ruth, The Art of Comparative Politics (Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1997)Google Scholar, esp. chaps. 5, 6.

5 Christopher Shea, “New Faces and New Methodologies Invigorate Russian Studies,” Chronicle of Higher Education, February 20, 1998, A16-A18. On the political economy of postcommunism, see Solnick, Steven, Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Gustafson, Thane, Capitalism Russian-Style (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Woodruff, David M., Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Shleifer, Andrei and Treisman, Daniel, Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000)Google Scholar. On federalism, see McAuley, Mary, Russia's Politics of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn, Local Heroes: The Political Economy of Russian Regional Governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar. On transitional justice, see Hendley, Kathryn, Trying to Make Law Matter: Legal Reform and Labor Law in the Soviet Union (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On nationalism and interethnic relations, see Laitin, David D., Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Bringa, Tone, Being Muslim the Bosnian Way: Identity and Community in a Central Bosnian Village (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Karakasidou, Anastasia N., Fields of Wheat, Hills of Blood: Passages to Nationhood Greek Macedonia, 1870–1990 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Balzer, Marjorie Mandelstam, The Tenacity of Ethnicity: A Siberian Saga in Global Perspective (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

6 Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice, Soviet Communism: A New Civilisation? (London: Gollancz, 1935)Google Scholar. Some travelers, especially Panait Istrati and Nikos Kazantzakis, were far less enthusiastic about the Soviet experiment than many of their contemporaries. Istrati, , Russia Unveiled, trans. Curtis, R. J. S. (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1931)Google Scholar; Kazantzakis, , Russia: A Chronicle of Three Journeys in the Aftermath of the Revolution (Berkeley, Calif: Creative Arts Book Company, 1989)Google Scholar.

7 The contribution of British scholars—especially Leonard Schapiro, Hugh Seton-Watson, Alec Nove, and later, Archie Brown, Stephen White, Mary McAuley, and others—was central. For an impressive survey of British scholarship, see Brown, Archie, “The Study of Totalitarianism and Authoritarianism,” in Hayward, Jack, Barry, Brian, and Brown, Archie, eds., The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

8 For important examples of this scholarship, see Fainsod, Merle, How Russia Is Ruled (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953)Google Scholar; Friedrich, Carl J. and Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956)Google Scholar. See also Friedrich, Carl J., ed., Totalitarianism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schapiro, Leonard, Totalitarianism (London: Pall Mall, 1972)Google Scholar. Schapiro was no less committed to straightforward institutional analysis, but his work did mark a shift toward trying to understand process as well as structure in the Soviet state; see Schapiro, , The Communist Party of the Soviet Union (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1960)Google Scholar.

9 For analyses of the role of the totalitarian model in shaping both academic debate and foreign policy, see Cohen, Stephen F., Rethinking the Soviet Experience: Politics and History since 1917 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Gleason, Abbott, Totalitarianism: The Inner History ofthe Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

10 For an overview of this literature, see Almond, Gabriel A. and Roselle, Laura, “Model Fitting in Communism Studies,” in Fleron, Frederic J. Jr., and Hoffman, Erik P., eds., Post-Communist Studies and Political Science (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1993)Google Scholar. For examples, see Brown, Archie, Soviet Politics and Political Science (London: Macmillan, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Archie and Gray, Jack, eds., Political Culture and Political Change in Communist States (London: Macmillan, 1977)Google Scholar; Brown, Archie, ed., Political Culture and Communist Studies (London: Macmillan, 1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Solomon, Susan Gross, ed., Pluralism in the Soviet Union: Essays in Honour of H. Gordon Stalling (London: Macmillan, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Hough, Jerry F. and Fainsod, Merle, How the Soviet Union Is Governed (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979), viiGoogle Scholar.

12 For important work, see Hill, Ronald J., Soviet Politics, Political Science and Reform (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980)Google Scholar; Rigby, T. H. and Harasymiw, Bogdan, eds., Leadership Selection and Patron-Client Relations in the USSR and Yugoslavia (London: Allen and Unwin, 1983)Google Scholar; White, Stephen and Pravda, Alex, eds., Ideology and Soviet Politics (London: Macmillan, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Archie, ed., Political Leadership in the Soviet Union (London: Macmillan, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rigby, T. H., Political Elites in the USSR Central Leaders and Local Cadres from Lenin to Gorbachev (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990)Google Scholar; idem, The Changing Soviet System: Monoorganisational Socialism from Its Origins to Gorbachev's Restructuring (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1990)Google Scholar.

13 The work of historians and economic historians was essential in the shift from the totalitarian model to elite-conflict and modernizationist models. See Von Laue, Theodore H., Why Lenin? Why Stalin? A Reappraisal of the Russian Revolution, 1900–1930 (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1964)Google Scholar; Nove, Alec, Economic Rationality and Soviet Politics, or Was Stalin Really Necessary? (New York: Praeger, 1964)Google Scholar; Pethybridge, Roger, The Social Prelude to Stalinism (London: Macmillan, 1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 For important interpretations of the early transition period from the perspective of the 1990s, see Roeder, Philip G., Red Sunset: The Failure of Soviet Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Fish, M. Steven, Democracy from Scratch: Opposition and Regime in the New Russian Revolution (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar, and Brown, Archie, The Gorbachev Factor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

15 The 1987 Ralph E. Bunche Award of the American Political Science Association was awarded to Rasma Karklins, for Ethnic Relations in the USSR: The Perspective from Below (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1986)Google Scholar. Karklins's work was followed by a flood of other books, as the ethnic dimensions of Soviet politics became increasingly evident. See Hajda, Lubomyr and Beissinger, Mark, eds., The Nationalities Factor in Soviet Politics and Society (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Nahaylo, Bohdan and Swoboda, Victor, Soviet Disunion: A History of the Nationalities Problem in the USSR (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1990)Google Scholar; Motyl, Alexander J., Sovietology, Rationality, Nationality: Coming to Grips with Nationalism in the USSR (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Smith, Graham, ed., The Nationalities Question in the Soviet Union (London: Longman, 1990)Google Scholar; Lapidus, Gail W. and Zaslavsky, Victor with Goldman, Philip, eds., From Union to Commonwealth: Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; d'Encausse, Helene Carrere, The Great Challenge: Nationalities and the Bolshevik State, 1917–1930, trans. Festinger, Nancy (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1992)Google Scholar; idem, The End of the Soviet Empire: The Triumph of the Nations, trans. Philip, Franklin (New York: Basic Books, 1993)Google Scholar; Bremmer, Ian and Taras, Ray, eds., Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

16 Rutland, , “Sovietology: Notes for a Post-Mortem,” National Interest, no. 31 (Spring 1993), 114–15Google Scholar.

17 For an overview of postcommunist diversity, see Bunce, Valerie, “The Political Economy of Post-socialism,” Slavic Review 58 (Winter 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Freedom House, Annual Survey of Freedom Country Scores, 1972—73 to 1998–99, www.freedom-house.org/ratings/ (accessed February 10,2000).

19 Transparency International, 1999 Corruption Perceptions Index, www.transparency.de/documents/cpi/index.html (accessed February 11,2000).

20 Human Rights Watch, Human Rights Watch World Report 2000, available at www.hrw.org; and U.S. Department of State, 1999 Human Rights Report, available at www.state.gov/www/global/-human_rights/hrp_reports_mainhp.html; Amnesty International 2000 Report (London: Amnesty International, 2000)Google Scholar. See also the comparative assessment of all OSCE member states in Torture and Inhuman Treatment or Punishment in the OSCE Region (Vienna: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, 2000)Google Scholar.

21 Rothschild, Joseph and Wingfield, Nancy M., Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe since World War II, 3d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

22 Holmes, Postcommunism: An Introduction (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997), 15Google Scholar.

23 For comparison, see Holmes (fn. 22); Stephen , White et al. , Communist and Postcommunist Political Systems: An Introduction, 3d ed. (New York: St. Martin's, 1990)Google Scholar; Mandelbaum, Michael, ed.,Postcommunism: Four Perspectives (New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, 1996)Google Scholar; White, Stephen, Batt, Judy, and Lewis, Paul G., eds., Developments in Central and East European Politics (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, White, Stephen and Nelson, Daniel N., eds., The Politics ofthe Postcommunist World: From Communist to Postcommunist Politics (London: Ashgate Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar.

24 Sakwa, , Russian Politics and Society, 2d ed. (London: Routledge, 1996)Google Scholar.

25 For perspectives from the left and the right, respectively, see Callinicos, Alex, The Revenge of History: Marxism and the East European Revolutions (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; and Skidelsky, Robert, The Road from Serfdom: The Economic and Political Consequences of the End of Communism (London: Allen Lane, 1996)Google Scholar.

26 Bunce, Valerie, “Can We Compare Democratization in the East versus the South?” Journal of Democracy 6 (July 1995)Google Scholar; idem, “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?” Slavic Review 54 (Spring 1995)Google Scholar; idem, “Paper Curtains and Paper Tigers,” Slavic Review 54 (Winter 1995)Google Scholar; idem, “Regional Differences in Democratization,” Post-Soviet Affairs 17 (July 1998)Google Scholar. See also Sarah Terry, Meilde John, “Thinking about Post-Communist Transitions: How Different Are They?” Slavic Review 52 (Summer 1993), 333–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schmitter, Philippe C. with Karl, Terry Lynn, “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidologists: How Far East Should They Attempt to Go?” Slavic Review 53 (Spring 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Karl, and Schmitter, , “From an Iron Curtain to a Paper Curtain: Grounding Transitologists or Students of Postcommunism?” Slavic Review 54 (Winter 1995), 965–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Palma, Di, To Craft Democracies:An Essay on Democratic Transitions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

28 See, for example, Yashar, Deborah J., “Democracy, Indigenous Movements, and the Postliberal Challenge in Latin America,” World Politics 52 (October 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Linz, Juan J. and Stepan, Alfred, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, Latin America, and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

29 For an analysis of the problems of transition modeling in a particular case, see Bunce, Valerie and Csanadi, Maria, “Uncertainty in the Transition: Post-Communism in Hungary,” East European Politics and Societies 7 (Spring 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 For an examination of this issue, see Easter, Gerald M., “Preference for Presidentialism: Postcommunist Regime Change in Russia and the NIS,” World Politics 49 (January 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Seleny, Anna, “Old Political Rationalities and New Democracies: Compromise and Confrontation in Hungary and Poland,” World Politics 51 (July 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 Carothers, , Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve (Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1999)Google Scholar; Wedel, , Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe, 1989–1998 (New York: St. Martin's, 1998)Google Scholar.

32 Przeworski, Adam, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), xiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Przeworski, and Teune, , The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (New York: John Wiley, 1970), 22–23Google Scholar.

34 For early exceptions, see Motyl (fn. 15); Roeder, Philip G., “Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization,” World Politics 43 (January 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hayden, Robert, “Constitutional Nationalism in the Formerly Yugoslav Republics,” Slavic Review 51 (Winter 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gagnon, V. P., “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia,” International Security 19 (Winter 1994–1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Today, the pendulum has perhaps swung too far in the opposite direction, stressing the manipulative role of unscrupulous elites to the exclusion of social factors.

35 Barkey, , Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

36 Woodward, , Socialist Unemployment: The Political Economy of Yugoslavia, 1945–1990 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 10.

37 Suny, , The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1993), 87Google Scholar. On the history of nation making in the Soviet Union and eastern Europe, see also Brubaker, Rogers, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 23–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Slezkine, Yuri, “The USSR as a Communal Apartment, or How a Socialist State Promoted Ethnic Particularism,” Slavic Review 53 (Summer 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Woodward, , Balkan Tragedy: Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1995)Google Scholar, Brubaker (fn. 37); Hechter, Michael, Containing Nationalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

39 Roeder, , “Peoples and States after 1989: The Political Costs of Incomplete National Revivals,” Slavic Review 58 (Winter 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 OSCE Election Observation Mission to the Kyrgyz Republic Parliamentary Election, “Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions,” Bishkek, February 21,2000.

41 Jones, Stephen F., “Democracy from Below? Interest Groups in Georgian Society,” Slavic Review 59 (Spring 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 “Foreign Observers Criticize Lopsided Shevardnadze Vote,” New York Times, April 11, 2000, A12.

43 King, Charles, The Moldovans: Romania, Russia, and the Politics of Culture (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 2000), 161Google Scholar.

44 Kuran, Timur, “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989,” World Politics 44 (October 1991), 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 A valuable contribution to this sort of comparison is made by Mark Beissinger and M. Crawford Young, eds., “The Quest for the Efficacious State in Africa and Eurasia” (Book manuscript, 2000).

46 Przeworski (fn. 32), 161.

47 For discussions of the ethical dimensions of post-Soviet studies, see Huber, Robert T. and Bronson, Susan, “The August Revolution and Soviet Studies,” in Fleron, Frederic J. Jr., and Hoffman, Erik P., eds., Post-Communist Studies and Political Science (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1993)Google Scholar; and the discussion of the “commercialization of scholarship” in Slavic Review 52 (Spring 1993)Google Scholar.

48 The most widely used text in the methodology of qualitative comparative research makes no mention of this issue. See King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.