Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:41:03.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradigms Revisited Productionism, Globality, and Postmodernity in Comparative Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Andrew C. Janos
Andrew C. Janos
Affiliation:
University of California
Get access

Abstract

Inspired by a seminal essay of Albert O. Hirschman, as well as by the ongoing debate on the empirical foundations of social science, this article “revisits” (1) the paradigm concept popularized by T. S. Kuhn in the 1960s and (2) the relationship between probabilistic and “possibilistic” modes of theorizing that has acquired renewed relevance in comparative politics mainly with respect to recent theories of democratization and development. It does so by reviewing three major paradigm crises in modern political science: the shift from the Aristotelian polls to the social “system,” the refocusing of political explanations from the social to the global environment, and the contemporary attempts to reevaluate the role of technology in political change. The review takes stock of the record of the discipline of comparative politics, of opportunities provided by paradigm shifts, seized upon or missed by the discipline. It also allows one to seek a more even balance between the potential utility and limitations of the paradigm concept, while at the same time pointing to the perils of divorcing the art of the possible from the laws of probability.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 50 , Issue 1: Special Issue , October 1997 , pp. 118 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hirschman, , “The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding,” World Politics 22 (April 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Fleck, , Entstebung und Entwtcklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einfuhrung in die Lebre vom Dankstil und Denkkollektiv (Genesis and development of a scientific fact: Introduction to the study of thought styles and thought collectives) (Basel: Benno Schwabe, 1935).Google Scholar See also Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, trans. Bradley, F. and Trenn, T.J. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar

3 See, for instance, Merton, Robert K., Social Theory and Social Structure, 2d ed. (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1957), 13–16, 50O-555, 582.Google Scholar

4 Kuhn, , The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1st ed. 1962, 2d ed. 1970).Google Scholar

5 Kuhn, (fn. 4,1970); and idem, “Second Thoughts on Paradigms,” in Suppe, Frederick, ed., The Structure of Scientific Theories (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974).Google Scholar

6 See Masterman, Margaret, “The Nature of a Paradigm,” in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan, eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar See also Eckberg, Douglas L. and Hill, Lester, “The Paradigm Concept and Sociology,” in Gutting, Gary, ed., Paradigms and Revolutions (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1980), 118.Google Scholar

7 Kuhn (fn. 4,1962), 77—90.

8 Fleck (fn. 2, 1935), 35.

9 A classic example of such stretching is Lenin's first major work, The Development of Capitalism in Russia (1898), 2d English ed. (Moscow: International Publishers, 1964).Google Scholar As for the United States, a search of the catalog of the University of California has yielded seventy-six library entries addressing the political problems of “transitional societies” published between 1958 and 1978. For representative tides, see Apter, David E., The Gold Coast in Transition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955)Google Scholar; or Hoselitz, Bert, ed., Agrarian Societies in Transition (Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1956).Google Scholar

10 For the notion of “telescoping,” see especially Lenin, , “Two Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolution,” in Lenin, V. I., Selected Works (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1970)Google Scholar, 1:462–541. For more recent, American examples, see Moore, Barrington Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorthip and Democracy (Boston: Beacon, 1964)Google Scholar; Pye, Lucian W., Aspects of Political Development (Boston: little Brown, 1966), esp. 31–70.Google Scholar

11 Bendix, Reinhard, “Tradition and Modernity Reconsidered,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 9 (April 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted in Bendix, , Nation-Building and Citizenship, 2d ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974), 382.Google Scholar

12 Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World System (New York: Academic Publishers, 1974).Google Scholar The classical formula was developed by Alexander I. Helphand (Parvus), Leon Trotsky, and Vladimir I. Lenin. See Scharlau, Winfried, “Parvus-Helphand als Theoretiker in der deutschen Sozialdemokratie und seine Rolle in der ersten russischen Revolution” (Parvus-Helphand as the theorist of German social democracy and his role in the first Russian revolution) (Ph.D. diss., Münster, 1964)Google Scholar; Trotsky, Leon, Results and Prospects (1908)Google Scholar, published in English as Permanent Revolution and Results and Prospects (New York: Merit, 1969)Google Scholar; Lenin, V. I., “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism” (1916)Google Scholar, in Selected Works, vol. 1 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1970).Google Scholar

13 Tucker, Robert W., The Inequality of Nations (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 63.Google Scholar

14 Most explicitly in Pye (fn. 10), 31–70. Also in Huntingdon, Samuel P., “The Change to Change: Modernization, Development and Politics,” Comparative Politics 3 (April 1971).Google Scholar

15 See, for example, Gunder Frank, André, “The Development of Underdevelopment,” and “Economic Dependence, Class Structure, and Underdevelopment Policy,” in Cockcroft, James D. Gunder Frank, André, and Johnson, Dale J., eds., Dependence and Underdevelopment in Latin America (New York: Doubleday, 1972).Google Scholar

16 See, for example, Myrdal, Gunnar, Rich Lands and Poor (New York: Harper, 1958)Google Scholar, esp. 23–38; Hirschman, Albert O., The Strategy of Economic Development (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar, esp. 183–98; and idem, “The Rise and Decline of Development Economics,” in Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 9.Google Scholar

17 See Platteau, Jean-Philippe, “Das Paradoxon des Staates in wirtschaftlich rückständigen Ländern” (The paradox of the state in economically underdeveloped countries), Oesterreichische Zeitscbrift für Soziologie 9, no. 4 (1984).Google Scholar

18 For a summary of British thinking on the relativity of scarcity, see Xenos, Nicholas, Scarcity and Modernity (New York: Routledge, 1987), 12–21Google Scholar; and Hume, David, “Of Commerce,” in Rorwine, Eugene, ed., Writings in Economics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970), 14.Google Scholar For Marx, see Marx, Karl, “Wage Labor and Capital,” in Tucker, Robert C., ed., Marx-Engels Reader (New York: W.W. Norton, 1972), 180.Google Scholar

19 Veblen, , Imperial Germany and the Industrial Revolution, 3d ed. (New York: Vintage, 1954), 147, 208.Google Scholar

20 Ibid., 208.

21 See Duesenberry, James S., Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967), 27Google Scholar; Leibenstein, Harvey, “Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumer Demand,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, no. 2 (1950).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Gurr, , Why Men Rebel? (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970), 101.Google Scholar

23 Mannheim, , Men and Society in an Age of Reconstruction, trans. Shils, E. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1940), 43–44.Google Scholar

24 Runciman, Walter G., Relative Deprivation and Social Justice (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1966), 9.Google Scholar

25 Oberschall, Anthony, “Rising Expectations and Political Turmoil,” Journal of Development Studies 6 (October 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 See, for example, André Gunder Frank, “The Sociology of Development and the Underdevelopment of Sociology,” in Cockcroft, Frank, and Johnson (m. 15).

27 Lerner, , The Passing of Traditional Society (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1969)Google Scholar; de Schweinitz, Karl, Industrialization and Democracy (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1964), 234–69Google Scholar; Bendix, Reinhard, Kings and Peoples (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), 12–13.Google Scholar

28 Stimulated largely by Lasswell, Harold, The Analysis of Political Behavior (London: Kegan Paul, 1947), 153–55.Google Scholar

29 See, among others, Deutscher, Issac, Russia, What Next? (New York: Oxford University Press, 1953)Google Scholar; von Laue, Theodore, Why Lenin, Why Stalin? 2d ed. (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1971)Google Scholar; Kautsky, J., Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries (New York: Wiley, 1962)Google Scholar; Nove, Alec, “The Soviet Model and Under-Developed Countries,” International Affairs 37 (January 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Black, Cyril et al., The Modernization of Japan and Russia (New York: Free Press, 1975)Google Scholar; and Hoettding, Oleg, “The Soviet Union: Model for Asia, State Planning and Forced Industrialization,” Problems of Communism 8 November-December 1959).Google Scholar For more, see Jones, T. Anthony, “Modernization Theory and Socialist Development,” in Field, Mark, Social Consequences of Modernization of Communist Societies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

30 Gregor, A. James, Italian Fascism and Developmental Dictatorship (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).Google Scholar

31 For Germany, see Mosse, George L., The Crisis of German Ideology: Intellectual Origins of the Third Reich (New York: Schocken, 1964)Google Scholar; Mohler, Armin, Die Konservative Revolution in Deutschland (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972)Google Scholar; von Klemperer, Klemens, Germany's New Conservatism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also the discussion of the “totalitarianism of the aristocracy” in Kautsky (fn. 29), 97–106.

32 Moore (fn. 10); Dahrendorf, Ralph, Society and Democracy in Germany (New York: W. W. Norton, 1967)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 25.

33 Arendt, Hannah, Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1951)Google Scholar; Cohn, Norman, The Pursuit of the Millennium (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960)Google Scholar, xii-xvi, 307–20; Talmon, J. L., The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy, 2d ed. (New York: Praeger, 1960)Google Scholar; Walzer, Michael, “Puritanism as Revolutionary Ideology,” in Eisenstadt, S. N., ed., The Protestant Ethic and Modernization (New York: Basic Books, 1967)Google Scholar; Stern, Fritz, The Politics of Cultural Despair (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1961).Google Scholar

34 List, Friedrich, The National System of Political Economy (1841), trans. Lloyd, Sampson S. (London: Longman's, 1916)Google Scholar; Fichte, Johann-Gottlieb, “Der geschlossene Handelsstaat” (The closed trading state), in Fichte, , Ausgewābtle Werke, vol. 3 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchhandlung, 1962).Google Scholar

35 Hirschman (fn. 16, 1981), 10.

36 For the original formula of the capitalist development state, see Johnson, Chalmers A., MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–75 (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar See also idem, “Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government-Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea and Taiwan,” in Deyo, Frederic C., ed., The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987)Google Scholar; idem, “The Institutional Foundations of Japanese Industrial Policy,” California Management Review 23 (Summer 1985)Google Scholar; Lim, Youngil, Government Policy and Private Enterprise: The Korean Experience in Industrialization (Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1981)Google Scholar; and Haggard, Stephan, Pathways from the Periphery (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

37 Ranke, Leopold, Die grossen Mächte: Politisches Gespräch (The great powers: Political discourse) (1836; Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Rupprecht, 1962)Google Scholar, esp. 60–61; Delbrück, Hans, Geschicbte der Kriegshinst im Rabmen der politiscben Geschichte (History of the art of war in the context of political history), 3d ed. (Berlin: deGruyter, 1962)Google Scholar; Hintze, Otto, Historical Essays, ed. and trans. Gilbert, Felix (New York: Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar, esp. 157–78. For an excellent survey of this literature, see Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, “Der Primat der auswärtigen Politik: Kritische Würdigung einer Staatsmaxime” (The primacy of external politics: Critical discussion of a principle of statecraft), Politische Viertel-jahresschrift 4 (September 1963).Google Scholar

38 Spencer, Herbert, On Evolution, ed. Peel, J. D. Y. (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1972).Google Scholar

39 Ibid., 152.

40 Ibid., 154.

41 For a major statement on this subject, see Kerr, Clark et al., Industrialization and Industrial Man (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966).Google Scholar See also Meyer, Alfred, “Theories of Convergence,” in Johnson, Chalmers, ed., Change in Communist Systems (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar

42 This term has been chosen in deference to Karl Mannheim (fn. 23), who used it to describe the essence of modern ideology.

43 For this distinction, see Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Politics of the World Economy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 97—111.Google Scholar See also Arrighi, Giovanni Hopkins, Terence K., and Wallerstein, Immanuel, Anti-Systemic Movements (New York: Verso, 1989).Google Scholar

44 Mussolini, Benito, Fascism: Doctrine and Institutions (Rome: Ardita, 1935), 10.Google Scholar

45 von Clausewitz, Karl, Vom Kriege (1832). English translations abound. References in this article are from The Living Thoughts of Clausewitz, trans, and ed. Greene, Joseph I. (New York; Longmans and Green, 1943)Google Scholar; for the other authors, see fn. 31.

46 Nettl, J. P. and Robertson, Ronald, International Systems and the Modernization of Societies (London: Faber, 1968), 56–57.Google Scholar

47 Bairoch, Paul, “The Main Trends in National Income Disparities since the Industrial Revolution,” in Bairoch, Paul and Lévy-Leboy, Maurice, Disparities in Economic Development since the Industrial Revolution (London: Macmillan, 1981), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Maddison, Angus, Monitoring the World Economy, 1820–1990 (Paris: OECD, 1995), 23–25.Google Scholar

49 Based on World Bank, World Development Report, 1978 (Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1978)Google Scholar; aid idem, World Development Report, 1995 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

50 Maddison (fn. 48), 23–24.

51 Bairoch, Paul, “Europe's Gross National Product, 1800–1975,” Journal of European Economic History 5 (Fall 1976), esp. 286,297.Google Scholar

52 World Bank (fn. 49,1978,1995).

53 In addition to the sources in fh. 36, one may cite the articles in a popular collection published and republished several times in the 1960s and 1970s. See the following essays in Finkle, Jason F. and Gable, Richard W., Political Development and Social Change (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971)Google Scholar; David C. McClelland, “Achievement Motive in Economic Growth”; Robert N. Bellah, “Religious Aspects of Modernization in Turkey and Japan”; Bert F. Hoselitz, “Non-economic factors in Economic Development”; Manning Nash, “Some Social and Cultural Aspects of Economic Development”; and Robert E. Ward, “Political Modernization and Political Culture in Japan.”

54 Hagen Koo, “The Interplay of State, Social Class, and World System in East Asian Development: The Cases of South Korea and Taiwan,” in Deyo (fn. 36), 165.

55 Ibid., 169.

56 Ibid., 167.

57 Ibid.

58 Most prominently, Anderson, Perry, Lineages of the Absolutist State (London: New Left Books, 1974)Google Scholar; Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions (London and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

59 See Gourevitch, Peter, “The Second Image Reversed: International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32 (Fall 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Ikenberry, G. John and Kupchan, Charles A., “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization 44 (Summer 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Keohane, Robert O., The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Regimes, Monograph no. 28 (Los Angeles: UCLA Center for Strategic Studies, 1980).Google Scholar

60 See fn. 37.

61 Bauman, , Intimations of Postmodernity (London and New York: Roudedge, 1992), 68–69.Google Scholar

62 See Tilly, Charles, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984).Google Scholar

63 Rudolph, , contribution to “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium,” World Politics 48 (October 1995), 28.Google Scholar

64 See, for example, Nisbet, Robert A., Social Change and History (New York and London: Oxford University Press, 1969)Google Scholar, esp. 220–23,249–50.

65 Merton (m. 3), 9,280, 328.

66 Derrida, , Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, A. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar

67 Lyotard, , The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, trans. Bennington, Geoff and Marsuni, Brian (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).Google Scholar

68 Bauman (fn. 60), 26.

69 Ibid., 35.

70 Ibid., 43.

71 See, for example, Toffler, Alvin, Future Shock (New York: Random House, 1970)Google Scholar; and idem, Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the Twenty-first Century (New York: Bantam, 1990).Google Scholar

72 Bell, , The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting (New York: Basic Books, 1973)Google Scholar; Janowitz, , The Last Half-Century: Societal Change and Politics in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).Google Scholar

73 See Reich, Robert B., The Work of Nations (New York: Knopf, 1991)Google Scholar; Kennedy, Paul, Preparing Ourselves for the Twenty-first Century (New York: Random House, 1993).Google Scholar The summary below draws upon these works but goes beyond their authors' conclusions.

74 Habermas, , The Theory of Communicative Action, voL 1, trans. McCarthy, Thomas (Boston: Beacon, 1982), xvii–xix.Google Scholar

75 Ibid., 1:71–72, 34 (M3; and 2:153–98. Also Habermas, “Toward a Reconstruction of Historical Materialism,” in Steven Seidman, ed., Habermas on Society and Politics (Boston: Beacon, 1989), 114–42.

76 Bauman (fn. 60), 171.

77 Ibid.

78 Fleck (fn. 2,1935), 35; (fn. 2,1979), 27.

79 Ibid., 9.

80 Reck (fn. 2,1979), 44.

81 Ibid., 42.

82 Kuhn (fn. 4,1962) 2.

83 Ibid., 61.

84 Ibid., 153.

85 Ibid., 115.

86 Katzenstein, contribution to “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium” (fn. 62), 14.

87 Webster New World (Cleveland, Ohio: World, 1975), 1112, 1132, emphasis added.Google Scholar

88 Clausewitz (fn. 45,1943), 43.

89 Ibid., 28,31.

90 Ibid., 157–58, emphasis on original.