Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
IHE problem of war and national security, at one time conceived of as the province of almost anyone but the peace-minded international relationist, has come increasingly to occupy scholars and researchers. Arnold J. Toynbee, whose major concern is the philosophy of history, preserves a lively interest in international politics and particularly in the problem of war, the principles of foreign policy, and the quest for an applicable body of theory concerning international society. With the publication of the last four volumes of his famed A Study of History, it may be appropriate to call attention to the other side of his work, especially as he brings to the discussion a clarity, simplicity, and concreteness refreshing by contrast with the pompous tautologies of much of modern scholarship. This article reviews Mr. Toynbee's contribution to knowledge on the first of the problems mentioned, namely, war and national security. It seeks to present his conception of the crisis in modern war, social factors underlying the transformation of warfare, and prevailing theories on the nature and inevitability of war.
1 Toynbee, Arnold J., The Prospects of Western Civilization, New York, 1947, p. 33.Google Scholar
2 Toynbee, , Civilization on Trial, New York, 1948, p. 25.Google Scholar
3 Toynbee, , A Study of History, IV, London, 1939, pp. 142–43.Google Scholar
4 Sorel, Albert, L'Europe et la révolution française, Paris, 1889, II, p. 109.Google Scholar
5 Ferrero, Guglielmo, Peace and War, tr. by Bertha Pritchard, London, 1933, p. 8.Google Scholar
6 Toynbee, , A Study of History, op. cit., IV, pp. 143–46.Google Scholar
7 Burckhardt, Jacob, Force and Freedom, New York, 1943, pp. 134–35.Google Scholar
8 Toynbee, , A Study of History, V, London, 1939, pp. 160–61.Google Scholar
9 Toynbee, , The Prospects of Western Civilization, op. cit., p. 89.Google Scholar
10 Ibid., p. 29.
11 Toynbee, , A Study of History, op. cit., IV, p. 143.Google Scholar
12 Ibid.
13 Ibid., pp. 150–51.
14 ibid., p. 150, n. 4.
15 Survey of International Affairs, 1931, London, 1932, p. 10.
16 Ibid.
17 Toynbee, , The Prospects of Western Civilization, op. cit., p. 19.Google Scholar
18 Toynbee, , A Study of History, op. cit., IV, pp. 153–54.Google Scholar This is evidently the type of statement from which some of Toynbee's American protégés like William H. McNeill derive their view that Western civilization can confidently face a Third World War, from which the United States will probably emerge as a universal state. However, it is a mistake to equate Toynbee's thinking with that of his lesser followers, as does The Times (London) in its review of McNeill's latest book.
19 Toynbee, , Civilization on Trial, op. cit., p. 25.Google Scholar
20 Toynbee, , A Study of History, op. cit., IV, p. 643.Google Scholar
21 The last-named conceives of man as a beast of prey which “lives by attacking and killing and destroying.” Spengler, Oswald, Man and Technics, New York, 1932, p. 28.Google Scholar J. F. C. Fuller wrote: “If honour be worth safeguarding, war sooner or later becomes inevitable, for in this world, there are always to be found dishonourable men, and if war does not bring a nation against these, then must vice live triumphant.” Fuller, , The Reformation of War, New York, 1923, p. 282.Google Scholar
22 Treitschke, Heinrich von, Politics, tr. by Dugdale, Blanche and Bille, Torben de, London, 1916, I, p. 68.Google Scholar
23 Ibid., p. 65. To a degree, the Communist dieory of war is romanticist in character. It maintains that war is inevitable under the capitalist system and encourages révolu-tionary wars and wars for national liberation. What is missing, however, is the idealization of war that we have observed above.
24 Toynbee, , “Parallels to Current International Problems,” International Affairs, X (July 1931), p. 479.Google Scholar
25 Wilson, Woodrow, “Fourth Liberty Loan” (address opening the campaign for Fourth Liberty Loan, delivered in New York City, September 27, 1918)Google Scholar, in War and Peace: Presidential Messages, Addresses, and Public Papers, ed. by Ray Stannard Baker and William E. Dodd, New York, 1927, I, p. 259.
26 Woolf, Leonard, The War for Peace, London, 1940, p. 53.Google Scholar
27 Survey of International Affairs, 1932, London, 1933, p. 184.
28 Toynbee, , Nationality and the War, London, 1915, p. 10.Google Scholar
29 Survey of International Affairs, 1935, London, 1936, I, pp. 48–49, n. 2.
30 Ibid., 1934, London, 1935, p. 353.
31 Buckle, Henry T., Introduction to the History of Civilization in England, New York, 1925, p. III.Google Scholar
32 Toynbee, , Nationality and the War, op. cit., p. 27.Google Scholar
33 Survey of International Affairs, 1935, op. cit., II, pp. 45–46.
34 Buckle, , op. cit., p. 125.Google Scholar
35 Keith, Arthur B., The Causes of the War, London, 1940, p. ix.Google Scholar
36 Fletcher, John M., “The Verdict of Psychologists on War Instincts,” Scientific. Monthly, xxxv (August 1932), pp. 142–45.Google Scholar
37 Huxley, Julian, “Is War Instinctive and Inevitable?” New York Times Magazine, February 10, 1946, p. 7.Google Scholar
38 Malinowski, Bronislaw, “War—Past, Present, and Future,” in Clarkson, J. D. and Cochran, T. C, War as a Social Institution, New York, 1941, p. 23.Google Scholar
39 James, William, “The Moral Equivalent of War,” International Conciliation, No. 224 (1926), p. 496.Google Scholar
40 Toynbee, , Survey of International Affairs, 1928, London, 1929, p. I.Google Scholar
41 Toynbee, , The Prospects of Western Civilization, op. cit., pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
42 Ibid., pp. 44ff.
43 Ibid., p. 48.