Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:26:53.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Search of the National Interest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Grayson L. Kirk
Affiliation:
Columbia University
Get access

Extract

There are fads in scholarship as well as in fashion. Just JL now, the current fad, with respect to American diplomatic history, is to belabor what is called “Wilsonianism” with all the sarcasm and dignified invective at the writer's disposal. It is almost de rigueur to expatiate upon the prescient wisdom of the Founding Fathers, to pass over most of the period between John Quincy Adams and William McKinley as relatively unimportant, and to concentrate the heaviest guns of criticism upon the “Utopianism” of the first half of the twentieth century. Only now, and belatedly, we are told, is the United States beginning to come down from the clouds of illusion and to survey realistically the true nature of the world with which its diplomatists and policymakers must cope. Only now are we beginning once again to measure possible policy decisions by the yardsticks of power and “the national interest.”

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kennan, George F., “Lectures on Foreign Policy,” Illinois Law Review, XLV (1951), pp. 718–42.Google Scholar

2 Beard, Charles A., The Open Door at Home, New York, 1935, pp. v–vi.Google Scholar

3 Garden, Le comte de, Traité complet de diplomatie, 3 vols., Paris, 1833, I, p. 7.Google Scholar