No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
It was a great shock to the American public to learn that during the Korean War some American prisoners had co-operated with their captors. It was obvious that they had acted under pressure, and it came as a surprise both that helpless prisoners had been subjected to such pressures and that Americans had yielded to them. It had long been taken for granted that prisoners of war would be treated according to the gentleman's code (except, possibly, for isolated outrages). It was overlooked that modern totalitarianism had never recognized the gentleman's code but had denounced it as a fraud, meant to facilitate the exploitation of the masses.
1 Bridgman, P. W., The Way Things Are, Cambridge, Mass., 1959, p. 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Oeuvres Complètes, Paris, 1864ff., 1, 2, p. 19 (my translation).
3 I.e., to the minds of those who have never had to face extreme situations.
4 Consideration of unconscious factors will add to, or alter, the picture, but it is hardly likely that a passion for unanimity would be added from this point of view.
5 Roepke, Wilhelm, Die deutsche Frage, 2nd ed., Zurich, 1945, pp. 55f.Google Scholar (my translation). See also Waelder, Robert, “Authoritarianism and Totalitarianism,” in Psychoanalysis and Culture, ed. by Wilbur, George B. and Muensterberger, Warner, New York, 1951, esp. pp. 189, 192ff.Google Scholar; and Waelder, , “Characteristics of Totalitarianism,” Psychoanalytic Study of Society, 1 (1960), esp. pp. 13ff.Google Scholar
6 Venturi, Franco, Roots of Revolution, New York, 1960, pp. 387f.Google Scholar