Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:58:59.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Colonial Question in Some British and American Overseas Possessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

John Gange
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , October 1950 , pp. 130 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Changing Empire, (notably in the sketch of Jan Christiaan Smuts).

2 Italics mine.

3 Italics mine.

4 New York, Doubleday, 1950.

5 New York, Harcourt, Brace, 1950.

6 Puerto Rican Migration, Rio Piedras, University of Puerto Rico, 1947 (quoted by Perloff, p. 224).

7 See Caribbean Commission Monthly Information Bulletin, Vol. III, No. 12 (July 1950) and successive issues.

8 This was the frequent comment made to me as far back as 1943–45 when I was with the Commission.

9 See, for example, Self-Government for the Colonies, p. 156.

10 Freedom and Welfare in the Caribbean, p. 234.

11 “International Responsibility for Colonial Peoples: The United Nations and Chapter XI of the Charter,” International Conciliation, No. 458 (February 1950), p. 95.