Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:27:43.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classing Ethnicity. Class, Ethnicity, and the Mass Politics of Taiwan's Democratic Transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

David D. Yang
David D. Yang
Affiliation:
Stanford University, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Although Taiwan is widely regarded as one of the purest examples of middle-class-driven democratization, this article suggests that the conventional accent on the middle class is misplaced. Instead, the true heroes in the struggle for democracy were the island's working classes, although proper recognition of this fact requires an empirically derived understanding of class that looks beyond formal labor politics. Although the author does not dispute the importance of ethnicity in Taiwanese politics, the findings clearly indicate that ethnic identity was in itself a class issue, as the island's working classes were the most deeply attached to a nativist Taiwanese identity, while members of the middle classes were far more successfully assimilated into the elite “national” culture. The Taiwanese experience thus provides a reminder that many political phenomena apparently framed in ethnic, sectarian terms are in fact undergirded by essentially class-based grievances.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , July 2007 , pp. 503 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sullivan, John D., “Market Institutions and Democracy,” Economic Reform Today, no. 2 (1996)Google Scholar.

2 Pei, Minxin, “The Puzzle of East Asian Exceptionalism,” Journal of Democracy 5, no. 1 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 For example, Lee, Junhan, “Primary Causes of Asian Democratization: Dispelling Conventional Myths,” Asia Survey 42 (December 2002)Google Scholar.

4 Ibrahim, Saad Eddin, “The Troubled Triangle: Populism, Islam and Civil Society in the Arab World,” International Political Science Review 19 (October 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ekiert, Grzegorz, “Democratization Processes in East Central Europe: A Theoretical Reconsideration,” British Journal of Political Science 21 (July 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 For example, Jones, David Martin, “Democratization, Civil Society, and Illiberal Middle Class Culture in Pacific Asia,” Comparative Politics 30 (January 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Giddens, Anthony, The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies (London: Hutchinson, 1980), 49Google Scholar.

8 Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, “Discovering East Asian Middle Classes: Formation, Differentiation, and Politics,” in Hsiao, Michael, ed., Discovery of the Middle Classes in East Asia (Taipei: Academia Sinica, 1993), 13Google Scholar.

9 Lipset, Seymour Martin, Political Man (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1960), 41Google Scholar.

10 Ibid.

11 Huntington, Samuel, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991), 66–68Google Scholar.

12 The same paradigm also undergirds the great majority of formal models of electoral behavior.

15 Mau-Kuei Chang, “Middle Class and Social and Political Movements in Taiwan,” in Hsiao (fh. 8).

14 For example, Parkin, Frank, Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique (New York: Columbia University Press, 1979)Google Scholar; and Wright, Erik Olin, Class, Crisis and the State (London: New Left Books, 1978)Google Scholar.

15 For example, MacKuen, Michael and Brown, Courtney, “Political Context and Attitude Change,” American Political Science Review 81 (June 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Parkin, Frank, Class Inequality and Political Order (New York: Praeger, 1971), 15Google Scholar.

17 Weber, Max, “Class, Status, Party,” in Neale, R. S., ed., History and Class (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983), 60Google Scholar.

18 Collier, Ruth Berins, Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Pye, Lucian, Asian Power and Politics (Cambridge: Belknap, 1985), 233Google Scholar.

20 Huntington (fn. 11), 71.

21 Shin, Doh Chull, “On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research,” World Politics 47 (October 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John, Capitalist Development and Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 294Google Scholar.

23 Wachman, Alan, Taiwan: National Identity and Democratization (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1994), 138Google Scholar.

24 The “native Taiwanese” in our discussion refer to the descendants of Han Chinese migrants who colonized the island a few centuries earlier, mostly from Fujian Province on the mainland. Culturally and ethnically, they continue to have much in common with the people of southern Fujian.

25 Breuilly, John, Nationalism and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), 371Google Scholar.

26 Hobsbawm, Eric, Nations and Nationalism since 1780 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 124Google Scholar.

27 It should be noted that the concept of class employed here is neo-Weberian and is related to but differs from the Weberian concept of “status group.” Weber, writing in an era when the traditional aristocratic elite still retained significant social influence, employed the concepts of “status group” and “class” to differentiate between alternative sources of social power—one based on prestige and the other based on control of economic resources. In modern societies, however, control over resources and the command of social prestige have become increasingly intertwined. The neo-Weberian concept of class reflects this reality.

28 See fn. 24.

29 Mau-kuai, Chang and Hsin-yi, Wu, “You Guan Min Zu yu Zu Qun Lun Shu Zhong de Ren Tong yu Qing Xu,” in Chia-lung, Lin and Yong-nian, Zheng, eds., Min Zu Zhu Yiyu Liang An Guan Xi [Nationalism and Cross-Strait Relations] (Taipei: Xin Zhi Ran Zhu Yi, 2001), 170Google Scholar.

30 Horowitz, Donald, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., 26–35.

32 Cheng, Tun-jen, “Democratizing the Quasi-Leninst Regime in Taiwan,” World Politics 41 (July 1989), 481CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Yang, David D., “Modernization and Legitimacy: Evidence from Late-Authoritarian Taiwan,” in White, Lynn T., ed., Legitimacy: Ambiguities of Political Success or Failure in East and Southeast Asia (Singapore: World Scientific Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

34 One survey found that the total number of protest actions islandwide nearly tripled from 274 in 1985 to 734 in 1987, then rose further to 1172 in 1988. See Jie-min, Wu, “Zheng Ti Zhuan Xing Qi de She Hui Kang Yi: Taiwan 1980 Nian Dai” [Social Protests in the Period of Political Transition: Taiwan in the 1980s] (Master's thesis, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, 1990), 45Google Scholar.

35 Chao, Linda and Myers, Ramon, The First Chinese Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), 124Google Scholar.

36 Chang, Paris, “Taiwan in 1982: Diplomatic Setback Abroad and Demands for Reforms at Home,” Asian Survey 23 (January 1983), 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Hickey, Dennis, “U.S. Arms Sales to Taiwan: Institutionalized Ambiguity,” Asian Survey 26 (December 1986), 1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Ibid., 1327. In fact these figures do not reflect the full extent of American military assistance to Taiwan. For example, in 1986 the U.S. announced that General Dynamics would provide technical assistance to Taiwan's U.S.S1 billion indigenous fighter program, in addition to direct sales of antisubmarine equipment and armored vehicles. See Copper, John, “Taiwan in 1986: Back on Top Again,” Asian Survey 27 (January 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Author telephone interview with James A. Leach, Princeton, N.J., May 8,2007.

40 Chao and Myers (fn. 35), 120.

41 This information was supplied by Hu Fu, a leading Taiwanese political scientist and longtime adviser to President Chiang Ching-kuo. Interview with the author, Taipei, Taiwan, June 27,2004.

42 Lin, Chia-lung, “Paths to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective” (Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1998), 235–38Google Scholar.

43 Ibid., 260–61.

44 Rigger, Shelley, Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy (New York: Routledge, 1999), 10Google Scholar.

45 For example, Shin (fn. 21).

46 An excellent account of these “part-time proletarians” in Taiwan is found in Gates, Hill, Chinese Working Class Lives: Getting by in Taiwan (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; the author found that the lifestyles of workers and small proprietors were almost indistinguishable. These findings are closely echoed by studies of working-class communities in the rest of the developing world.

47 For example, Gates, Hill, “Dependency and the Part-Time Proletariat in Taiwan,” Modern China 5 (July 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 For example, Hong, Doo-Seung, “Occupation and Class: An Exploration of Class Classification by Cluster Analysis,” Korean Social Science Journal 16 (1990)Google Scholar.

49 Cluster analysis is a statistical technique for measuring the similarities between research subjects.

50 Parkin, Frank, Class Inequality and Political Order (New York: Praeger, 1971), 18–19Google Scholar.

51 That is to say, the difference between categories is measured by the difference between their average incomes, educational levels, and subjective class identifications, measured as a distance in Cartesian space.

52 Let me comment briefly on the interpretation of the dendrograms. The vertical axis measures the social distance between clusters in the Cartesian space defined by the clustering variables (for example, the three-dimensional space defined by income, education, and subjective class identity in the basic demographic model). The location of the horizontal branch connecting two clusters indicates the distance between them, which is measured—under average linkage—by the distance between the average characteristics of the two clusters. In Figure 1, for example, the social distance between service and industrial workers is the smallest, and they are therefore clustered together. The self-employed are more similar to the industrial and service workers than any other group; they are therefore clustered together. And the distance between the popular sector (the rightmost four groups) and the cluster formed of all other groups is the greatest, and they are joined only at the top of the tree. Empirically speaking, the self-employed are differentiated from the bourgeoisie by their lower incomes and subjective class identifications and from the low-level white-collar workers by their lower educational attainments as well as by subjective identifications.

53 Gates (fn. 46), 228, also 61.

54 Haller, Max, “Marriage, Women, and Social Stratification: A Theoretical Critique,” American Journal of Sociology 86 (January 1981), 778CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Yong, Wei, Min Yi Yu Zheng Ce Zi Hu Dong [The Interaction between Public Opinion and Public Policy] (Taipei: Qian Zhan Zheng Ce Yan Jiu Zhong Xin, 2003), 440–41Google Scholar.

56 For example, Zhen-huan, Wang, Shui Tong Zhi Tai Wan [Who Rules Taiwan] (Taipei: Ju Liu, 1996), 1Google Scholar.

57 Ming-xiu, He, “Taiwan Huan Jing Yun Dong de Kai Duan: Zhuan Jia Xue Zhe, Dang Wai, Cao Gen 1980–1986,” Taiwan She Hui Xue 2 (December 2001)Google Scholar.

58 Author interview with He Min-hao, Taipei, Taiwan, July 27,2004; author interview with Huang Huang-hsiung, Taipei, Taiwan, August 9, 2004.

59 Qi-sheng, Pan, “Taiwan Di qu Zheng Zhi Kang Zheng Zhi Yan Jiu” [Political Protests in Taiwan] (Master's thesis, National Cheng-chi University, Institute of the Three People's Principles, 1991)Google Scholar.

60 Huai-en, Peng, “Taiwan Di Qu Zheng Dang Nei Bu Jie Gou Zi Fen Xi—Bi Jiao Guo Min Dang, Min Jin Dang, Zhong Hua She Min Dang,” in Zheng Dang Zheng Zhiyu Min Zhu Xian Zheng [Party Politics and Democratic Constitutionalism] (Taipei: Democracy Foundation, 1991)Google Scholar.

61 For example, Jin-shou, Wang, “Guo Min Dang Hou Xuan Ren Mai Piao Ji Qi de Jian Li yu Yun Zuo,” Taiwanese Political Science Review 2 (December 1997)Google Scholar.

62 Most former Dang-wai candidates interviewed by the author emphasized that campaign contributions were of secondary importance, in part because their needs were so modest. Opposition candidates employed almost no media advertising, and relied heavily on mass rallies to spread their message. The vast majority of contributions appear to have been quite small, often made in the form of bills and coins tossed into the back of the campaign truck. In poorer districts, donations often took the form of foodstuffs and groceries; author interviews with Zhang Junhong, Yao Jiawen, Huang Huangxiong, and so on, Taipei, Taiwan, 2004.

63 Pan (fn. 59), 123.

64 Taiwan, Ministry of Interior, National Police Agency, Mei Zhu Lian Bang Fen Zi Xiao Shen Dengjie Ying Pan Guo Fen Zi Xu Xin Liang Fan Tai [American United Bamboo Gang Member “Little Shen” and Others to Welcome the Traitor Xu Xin-liang Back to Taiwan], Academia Historica Catalog no. 134–2, File no. 140–2 (1986). It should be noted that the demonstration, organized in conjunction with the opposition leader Xu Xin-liang's attempted return to Taiwan from exile in America, was a “purely political” event that did not involve any specific economic issues.

65 For example, Jie-min, Wu, “Zheng Ti Zhuan Xing Qj de She Hui Kang Yi: Taiwan 1980 Nian Dai” [Social Protests in the Period of Political Transition: Taiwan in the 1980s] (Master's thesis, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University, 1990)Google Scholar.

66 Deyo, Frederic, “State and Labor: Modes of Political Exclusion in East Asian Development,” in Deyo, Frederic, ed., Tie Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987), 197Google Scholar.

67 See, for example, Tversky, Amos and Griffin, Dale, “Endowment and Contrast in Judgments of Well-Being,” in Strack, Fritz, Argyle, Michael, and Schwarz, Norbert, eds., Subjective Well-Being (Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991), 101–18Google Scholar.

68 For detailed explanations of the construction of these indices, the reader is referred to Yang (fn. 33).

69 Yun-jie, Li, Taiwan Gong Hut Zheng Ce de Zheng Zhi Jing Ji Fen Xi [A Political Economic Analysis of Taiwan's Labor Union Policy] (Taipei: Ju-liu, 1992), 120–21Google Scholar.

70 Ibid., 126.

71 Zhonghong, Lin, Da Ping Wei Zun Yan — Da Tong Gong Hui Fen Dou Shi [We Fight for Dignity: A History of the Struggles of the Tatung Union] (Taipei: Taiwan Labor Front, 2000)Google Scholar.

72 Chou, Yangsun and Nathan, Andrew, “Democratizing Transition in Taiwan,” Asian Survey 17 (March 1987), 293Google Scholar.

73 Collected in Xiu-huan, Zhou and Shi-hong, Chen, eds., Documentary Collection on Democratization Movement of Postwar Taiwan, vol. 2, Organizing the Opposition Parties (in Chinese) (Taipei: Academia Historica, 2000)Google Scholar.

74 For an analysis of the Xiang Tu Wen Xue (nativist literature) movement of the 1970s, see, for example, A-Qin, Xiao, “1980 Nian Dai Yi Lai Taiwan Wen Hua Min Zu Zhu Yi de Fa Zhan: Yi Taiwan Min Zu Wen Xue Wei Zhu de Fen Xi,” Taiwan She Hui Xue Yanjiu 3 (July 1999)Google Scholar.

75 van den Berg, M. E., “Language Planning and Language Use in Taiwan,” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 59 (June 1986)Google Scholar.

76 Gold, Thomas B., State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1986)Google Scholar.

77 Chia-Lung, Lin, “Guomin Dang yu Minjin Dang de QunZhong JiChu: Taiwan Xuanmin Zhengdang ZhiChi de Bijiao Fen Xi” [The Mass Base of the KMT and the DPP: A Comparative Analysis of Political Support Among the Taiwanese Electorate]” (Master's thesis, National Taiwan University, 1988), 156Google Scholar.

78 Yang (fn. 33), figure 5.

79 Jun-hong, Zhang, Taiwan de Weijiyu Zhuanji [Taiwan's Crisis and Opportunity] (Taipei: Independent Evening News Cultural Press, 1989)Google Scholar.

80 For example, Jacobs, Bruce, “Political Opposition and Taiwan's Political Future,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 3 (July 1981), 23Google Scholar.

81 Ji, Huang, “Wu Dang Ji Ren Shi Jing Xuan Yan Lun Zhi Yan Jiu” [A Study of the Campaign Literature of Candidates without Party Affiliations] (Master's thesis, Department of Political Science, National Cheng-chi University, 1980)Google Scholar.

82 Lu, Annette, Chong Shen Mei Li Dao [Retrying the Formosa Case] (Taipei: Independent Evening News Press, 1991), 428Google Scholar.

83 Jun-hong, Zhang, Dao Chi Zheng Zhi Lu — “Di Fang Bao Wei Zhong Yang” de Li Lun yu Shi Ji [The Road to Power—The Theory and Practice of “Surrounding the Center from the Grassroots”] (Taipei: Nan Fang Press, 1989), 80Google Scholar.

84 Hobsbawm (fn. 26), 124; also Horowitz (fn. 30), 32.

85 Chia-lung, Lin, “Taiwan Min Zhu Hua yu Guo Zu Xing Cheng,” in Chia-lung, Lin and Yong-nian, Zheng, eds., Min Zu Zhu Yiyu Liang An Guan Xi [Nationalism and Cross-Strait Relations] (Taipei: Xin Zhi Ran Zhu Yi, 2001), 224Google Scholar.

86 Mau-Kuei, Chang and Hsin-yi, Wu, “Education and Its Effects on Tong-Du Inclinations,” Taiwanese Political Science Review 2 (December 1997), 178Google Scholar.

87 Van den Berg (fn. 75), 99.

88 Ibid., 103–7.

89 For example, a 1989 survey of union members found that among workers “very satisfied” with labor welfare, 48 percent supported the KMT and only 1 percent supported the DPP. Among those “dissatisfied”, the figures were 26 percent for the KMT and 19 percent for the DPP. See Xian-zheng, Hong, “Zhuan-xing She-hui Zhong Nong Gong Xuan Min de Zheng Dang Zhi Chi Xing Wei zhi Yan Jiu” [A Study of Political Partisan Support among Farmers and Workers in a Transitional Society] (Ph.D. diss., Sun Yet-sen Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Cheng-Chi University, 1995), 275Google Scholar.

90 Hong (fn. 89).

91 See Chou and Nathan (fn. 72), 282. See also Jacobs (fn. 80), 28.

92 Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald, The American Voter (New York: Wiley, 1960)Google Scholar; Converse, Philip, “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Politics,” in D. E. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent (London: Free Press of Glenoe, 1964)Google Scholar.

93 Jun-hong, Zhang, Taiwan Gong Shang Ren — “Bu Luo Ri Gong Shang Di Guo” de Di Zao Z.he [Taiwanese Industrialists and Businessmen—Creators of the Global Industrial-Commercial Empire] (Taipei: Independent Evening News Cultural Press, 1989), 6Google Scholar.

94 Ibid.

95 Zhang (fn. 83), 140–41.

96 Based on the 1983 and 1986 electoral surveys.

97 The logic here is broadly parallel to that presented by Dan Posner with regard to the choice of identities in a purely ethnic mobilizational strategy; see Posner, , Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

98 Laitin, David, “Political Culture and Political Preferences,” American Political Science Review 82 (June 1988), 591CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 For an insightful discussion on the biological basis of nationalist appeals, see Johnson, Gary, “The Architecture of Ethnic Identity,” Politics and the Life Sciences 16 (September 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

100 For example, Wachman (fn. 23).

101 For example, Lin (fn. 85).

102 Kitschelt, Herbert, “Political Regime Change: Structure and Process-Driven Explanations?” American Political Science Review 86 (December 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

103 Varshney, Ashutosh, “Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality,” Perspectives on Politics 1 (March 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

104 Slater, Dan, “Where Were the Workers? Communal Elites and Mass Mobilization in Southeast Asia's Democratization Struggles” (Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 2004)Google Scholar.

105 Bellin, Eva, “Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late-Developing Countries,” World Politics 52 (January 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.