Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:59:46.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biological Nature of the State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

R. D. Masters
R. D. Masters
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College
Get access

Abstract

The origin of the state, long at the center of political science, can be greatly illuminated by the contemporary approach in evolutionary biology known as “inclusive fitness theory.” Natural selection is now analyzed using cost-benefit models akin to rational actor models in economics, game theory, and collective choice theory. The utility of integrating these approaches is illustrated by using the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Tragedy of the Commons to outline a general model for the evolution of political and legal institutions. This perspective also shows how traditional political philosophers explored “archetypical” problems that are easily translated into scientific terminology. It is thus possible to link biology to the study of human behavior in a nonreductionist manner, thereby generating new empirical hypotheses concerning the environmental correlates of social norms. Ultimately, such a unification of the natural and social sciences points to a return to the classical view that law and justice are not matters of pure convention, but rather are grounded on what is right “according to nature.”

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , January 1983 , pp. 161 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Owen Lovejoy, C., “The Origin of Man,” Science, Vol. 221 (January 23, 1981), 341–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leakey, Richard E. and Lewin, Roger, Origins (New York: Dutton, 1977).Google Scholar

2 Wilson, Edward O., Sociobiology (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Barash, David, Sociobiology and Behavior (New York: Elsevier, 1977).Google Scholar

3 Masters, Roger D., “Functional Approaches to Analogical Comparisons between Species,” in Cranach, Mario von, ed., Methods of Comparing Animal and Human Behavior (The Hague: Mouton, 1976), 73–102.Google Scholar

4 Campbell, Donald T., “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-cultural Evolution,” in Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W., eds., Social Change in Developing Areas (Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1965), 19–48Google Scholar; Masters, Roger D., “Politics as a Biological Phenomenon,” Social Science Information, XIV (April 1975), 7–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alexander, Richard D., “Evolution, Human Behavior, and Determinism,” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, II (1977), 3–21.Google Scholar

5 Rosenberg, Alexander, Sociobiology and the Preemption of Social Science (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Alexander, Richard D., “Evolution, Culture, and Human Behavior: Some General Considerations,” in Alexander, Richard D. and Tinkle, Donald W., eds., Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and Theory (New York: Chiron Press, 1982), 504–20Google Scholar; Wahlke, John C., “Prebehavioralism in Political Science,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 73 (March 1979), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Sahlins, Marshall, Use and Abuse of Biology (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Caplan, Arthur, ed., The Sociobiology Debate (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).Google Scholar

7 Masters, Roger D., “Is Sociobiology Reactionary? The Political Implications of Inclusive Fitness Theory,” Quarterly Review of Biology, Vol. 57 (September 1982), 275–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Bressler, Marvin, “Biological Determinism and Ideological Indeterminacy,” in White, Elliott, ed., Sociobiology and Human Politics (Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1981), 181–91.Google Scholar For historical perspective, see also Graham, Loren, “Science and Values: The Eugenics Movement in Germany and Russia in the 1920s,” American Historical Review, Vol. 82 (December 1977), 1133–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

8 Fox, Robin, ed., Biosocial Anthropology (London: Malaby, 1975)Google Scholar; Chagnon, Napoleon and Irons, William, eds., Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior (N. Scituate, Mass.: Duxbury, 1979)Google Scholar; Lockard, Joan S., ed., The Evolution of Human Social Behavior (New York: Elsevier, 1980)Google Scholar; Berghe, Pierre van den & Barash, David, “Inclusive Fitness and Family Structure,” American Anthropologist, Vol. 79 (No. 4, 1977), 809–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 Hirshleifer, Jack, “Natural Economy vs. Political Economy,” Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1 (October 1978), 319–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chase, Ivan, “Cooperative and Noncooperative Behavior in Animals,” American Naturalist, Vol. 115 (June 1980), 827–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Margolis, Howard, “A New Model of Rational Choice,” Ethics, Vol. 91 (January 1981), 265–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Tiger, Lionel, Men in Groups (New York: Random House, 1969)Google Scholar; Mazur, Allan, “Biosociology,” in Short, James F. Jr, ed., The State of Sociology (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1981), 141–60.Google Scholar

11 Somit, Albert, ed., Biology and Politics (The Hague: Mouton, 1976)Google Scholar; Wiegele, Thomas C., Biopolitics (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1979)Google Scholar; White (fn. 7); Watts, Meredith, ed., Biopolitics: Ethological and Physiological Approaches, New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science, No. 7 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981).Google Scholar

12 Beckoff, Marc and Wells, Michael C., “The Social Ecology of Coyotes,” Scientific American, Vol. 242 (April 1980), 130–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wrangham, Richard, “Review Essay: Sociobiology,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, XIII (March 1980), 171.Google Scholar

13 Alexander, Richard D., “Natural Selection and the Analysis of Human Sociality,” in Goulden, C. E., ed., Changing Scenes in Natural Sciences, 1776–1976 (Special Publication 12, Philadelphia: Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, 1977), 283–337Google Scholar; Campbell, Donald T., “On the Genetics of Altruism and the Counter-hedonic Components in Human Culture,” Journal of Social Issues, XXVIII (NO. 3, 1972), 21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson (fn. 2), Part III.

14 E.g., Thomas Aquinas, St., Summa Theologica, I–II, Q. 90–97Google Scholar, in Bigongiari, Dino, ed., The Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas (New York: Hafner, 1957), 3–85Google Scholar; Machiavelli, , Discourses on Titus Livy, ed. by Crick, Bernard, I, ii and I, ix (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1970), 104–11, 131–34.Google Scholar

15 Barash (fn. 2), 57–62; Kummer, Hans, “On the Value of Social Relationships to Non-human Primates: A Heuristic Scheme,” in Cranach, Mario von and others, Human Ethology (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1979), 381–95.Google Scholar

16 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Second Discourse, Part I and note j, in Masters, Roger D., ed., Rousseau's First and Second Discourses (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1964), 104–40, 203–13Google Scholar; Galdikas-Brindamour, Birute, “Orangutans, Indonesia's ‘People of the Forest’,” National Geographic, Vol. 148 (October 1975), 444–73Google Scholar; Masters, Roger D., “Jean-Jacques is Alive and Well: Rousseau and Contemporary Sociobiology,” Daedalus, Vol. 107 (Summer 1978), 93–105.Google Scholar

17 Williams, George C., Adaptation and Natural Selection (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

18 Maynard-Smith, John, “The Evolution of Behavior,” Scientific American, Vol. 239 (September 1978), 176–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barash (fn. 2), 51–52; Hirshleifer (fn. 9); Chase (fn. 9). On the distinction between “ultimate” and “proximate” causation, see Barash (fn. 2), 37–39.

19 Hamilton, , “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, VII (No. 1, 1964), 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; reprinted in Caplan (fn. 6), 191–209. Cf. Barash (fn. 2), 96.

20 On the importance of this distinction, see Stent, Günther, “You Can Take the Ethics out of Altruism, But You Can't Take the Altruism out of Ethics,” Hastings Center Report, VII (1977), 33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roger D. Masters, “Beyond Reductionism,” in von Cranach (fn. 15), 265–84.

21 On the “coefficient of relatedness”—i.e., “the fraction of genes in two individuals that are identical by descent, averaged over all loci”—as a measure of reproductive success, see Wilson (fn. 2), 74. For examples of non-mating strategies, see also Barash (fn. 2), esp. 91–93.

22 Trivers, Robert, “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism,” Quarterly Review of Biology, XLVI (No. 4, 1971), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 Pierotti, Raymond, “Spite and Altruism in Gulls,” American Naturalist, Vol. 115 (February 1980), 290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wilson (fn. 2), 119.

24 Alexander, Richard D., “Evolution of Social Behavior,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, v (1974), 25–83Google Scholar; Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene (New York: Oxford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

25 Williams (fn. 17); Trivers, Robert, “Sociobiology and Politics,” in White (fn. 7), 4–7.Google Scholar

26 Wilson, David Sloan, The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities (Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin Cummings, 1979)Google Scholar; Masters, Roger D., “The Value—and Limitations—of Sociobiology,” in White (fn. 7), 135–65.Google Scholar

27 Alexander, Richard D. and Borgia, Gerald, “Group Selection, Altruism, and the Levels of the Organization of Life,” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, IX (1978), 449–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Layzer, David, “Altruism and Natural Selection,” Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 1 (July 1978), 297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wade, Michael J., “Kin Selection: Its Components,” Science, Vol. 210 (November 7, 1980), 665–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

28 Hoffman, Martin L., “Is Altruism Part of Human Nature?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, XL (January 1981), 121–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Margolis, Howard, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

29 Real, Leslie A., “Fitness, Uncertainty, and the Role of Diversification in Evolution and Behavior,” American Naturalist, Vol. 115 (May 1980), 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Masters, Roger D., “Of Marmots and Men: Human Altruism and Animal Behavior,” in Wispe, Lauren, ed., Altruism, Sympathy, and Helping (New York: Academic Press, 1978), 59–77Google Scholar; Stent, Günther, ed., Morality as a Biological Phenomenon (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar

31 Trivers (fn. 25), 9–39; Willhoite, Fred, “Rank and Reciprocity: Speculations on Human Emotions and Political Life,” in White (fn. 7), 239–58.Google Scholar

32 Schubert, Glendon, “The Sociobiology of Political Behavior,” in White (fn. 7), 193–238Google Scholar; Masters (fn. 20); Stent (fn. 30); Anderson, P. W., “More is Different,” Science, Vol. 177 (August 4, 1972), 393–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

33 Lorenz, Konrad, Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970–1971).Google Scholar

34 Masters, Roger D., “Genes, Language, and Evolution,” Semiotica, 11 (No. 4, 1970), 295–320Google Scholar; Crook, John Hurrell, The Evolution of Human Consciousness (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

35 Griffin, Donald R., The Question of Animal Awareness (New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Bonner, John Tyler, The Evolution of Culture in Animals (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

36 Barry, , Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy (London: Macmillan, 1970).Google Scholar Cf. Wright Mills, C., The Sociological Imagination (New York: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar

37 Masters (fns. 7 and 26); Williams (fn. 25); Alexander and Borgia (fn. 27).

38 Hirshleifer, Jack, “Economics from a Biological Viewpoint,” Journal of Law and Economics, xx (April 1977), 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chase (fn. 9); Margolis (fn. 28).

39 E. g., Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper, 1957)Google Scholar; Olson, Mancur Jr, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965)Google Scholar; Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Sullivan, Denis G., Nakamura, Robert T., and Winters, Richard F., How America Is Ruled (New York: Wiley, 1980).Google Scholar

40 Trivers (fn. 22); Maynard-Smith (fn. 18); McEachron, Donald L. and Baer, Darius, “A Review of Selected Sociobiological Principles: Application to Hominid Evolution. II. The Effects of Intergroup Conflict,” Journal of Social and Biological Structures, v (April 1982), 121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics (New York: Wiley, 1957)Google Scholar, Part IV; Axelrod, Robert, “Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, XXIV (March 1980), 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “More Effective Choice in the Prisoner's Dilemma,” ibid. (September 1980), 379–403.

42 Axelrod, Robert and Hamilton, William D., “The Evolution of Cooperation,” Science, Vol. 211 (March 27, 1981), 1390–96CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Axelrod, Robert, “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 75 (June 1981), 306–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 Trivers (fns. 22 and 25).

44 Axelrod and Hamilton (fn. 42).

45 Maynard-Smith (fn. 18).

46 Hirshleifer, Jack, “Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation versus Conflict Strategies,” Research in Law and Economics (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1982), IV, 1–60.Google Scholar

47 Hardin, Russell, “Collective Action as an Agreeable n-Prisoners' Dilemma,” Behavioral Science, XVI (September 1971), 472–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McLean, Iain, “The Social Contract in Leviathan and the Prisoner's Dilemma Supergame,” Political Studies, XXIX (September 1981), 339–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

48 Hardin, Garrett, “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science, Vol. 162 (December 13, 1968), 1243–48Google ScholarPubMed, reprinted in Daley, Herman E., ed., Toward a Steady-State Economy (San Francisco: Freeman, 1973)Google Scholar, chap. 6.

49 Ibid., 104.

50 E.g., Cole, John N., “Learning a Hard Lesson in Aroostook County,” Country Journal (November 1980), 42–46.Google Scholar

51 Margolis (fn. 28), chap. 9.

52 Laver, Michael, The Politics of Private Desire (Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1981)Google Scholar, esp. chap. 3.

53 Alexander, Richard D., “Natural Selection and Societal Laws,” in Tristram Engelhardt, H. and Callahan, Daniel, eds., Morals, Science, and Society, Vol. III (Hastings-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Hastings Center, 1978)Google Scholar, chap. 7; Hirshleifer (fn. 46); R. Hardin (fn. 47).

54 Olson (fn. 39); Laver (fn. 52).

55 Donald T. Campbell, “Legal and Primary-Group Social Controls Curbing Selfish and Nepotistic Human Nature,” in Margaret Gruter and Paul Bohannon, eds., Biology, Culture, and Law. (Special Issue of Journal of Social and Biological Structures, in press.)

56 Cohen, Ronald and Service, Elman R., eds., Origins of the State (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1978).Google Scholar

57 G. Hardin (fn. 48); Harris, Marvin, Cannibals and Kings (New York: Random House, 1977).Google Scholar Cf. Machiavelli, , Discourses on Titus Lity, I, ii and III, iGoogle Scholar; Plato, , Republic, VIII, 546a–547cGoogle Scholar; Aristotle, Politics, V.ii.1302a–b and V.xii.1316a–b.

58 Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. by Oakeshott, Michael, I, xiii–xiv (London: Colliers-Macmillan, 1962), 98–112.Google Scholar

59 Ophuls, William, “Leviathan or Oblivion?” in Daly, Herman E., ed., Toward a Steady State Economy (San Francisco: Freeman, 1973), 215–30Google Scholar; McLean (fn. 47).

60 Hobbes (fn. 58), I, xiv, p. 110.

61 Ibid., I, xxi, p. 165.

62 Ibid., I, xv, p. 113.

63 Rousseau, , Second Discourse, Part I (fn. 16), esp. 107, 128–30.Google Scholar

64 Ibid., 137.

65 Masters, Roger D., The Political Philosophy of Rousseau (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968)Google Scholar, chap. 3.

66 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Social Contract, I, viii, in Masters, Roger D., ed., Social Contract, with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1978), 56.Google Scholar

67 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, First Discourse (fn. 16), 41–42, 49, 51–52Google Scholar; Rousseau, , Emile, ed. by Bloom, Allan, I (New York: Basic Books, 1979), 39–40.Google Scholar

68 Rousseau, , Social Contract, II, iv (fn. 66), 64.Google Scholar

69 E.g., Charvet, John, The Social Problem in the Philosophy of Rousseau (London: Cambridge University Press, 1974).Google Scholar

70 Masters, Roger D., “Nothing Fails Like Success: Development and History in Rousseau's Political Teaching,” in MacAdam, Jim and others, eds., Trent Rousseau Papers (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1980), 99–118Google Scholar; Masters (fn. 16, 1978); Masters (fn. 65).

71 Rousseau, , Geneva Manuscript, I, iiGoogle Scholar, and Political Economy (fn. 66), 157–63, 218–20.

72 Immanuel Kant, Metaphysical Foundations of Morals, in Friedrich, Carl J., ed., The Philosophy of Kant (New York: Modern Library, 1964), 140–208.Google Scholar

73 Hjort, Johan, The Human Value of Biology (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stent (fn. 30).

74 Kant (fn. 72), 154 (emphases in original).

75 Wispe (fn. 30), esp. chap. 4; Kummer, Hans, “Analogs of Morality Among Nonhuman Primates,” in Stent (fn. 30), 31–47.Google Scholar

76 Kant (fn. 72), 174.

77 Ibid., 180, 182.

78 Rousseau, , Political Economy (fn. 66), 218–20.Google Scholar

79 Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, The Philosophy of Right, ed. by Knox, T. M. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar

80 Ibid., 37–74.

81 Ibid., 75–105.

82 Ibid., 110–22.

83 Ibid., 122–55.

84 Ibid., 155–223.

85 Ibid., Para. 161, p. 111; Para. 190, p. 127.

86 Ibid., Para. 259, p. 160; Para. 267, p. 163.

87 Masters, Roger D., “Classical Political Philosophy and Contemporary Biology,” paper presented to Conference for the Study of Political Thought, Chicago, 111., April, 1978.Google Scholar

88 Trivers (fn. 25).

89 Masters, Roger D., “Nature, Human Nature, and Political Thought,” in Roland Pennock, J. and Chapman, John, eds., Human Nature in Politics (New York: New York University Press, 1977), 69–110Google Scholar; Morin, Edgar, Le Paradigme Perdu (Paris: Seuil, 1973).Google Scholar

90 Strauss, Leo, Natural Right and History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).Google Scholar

91 Kroeber, A. L., The Nature of Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952)Google Scholar; Hines, Samuel M. Jr, “The Origins of the State,” in Flohr, Heiner and Tommesmann, Wolfgang, eds., Politik und Biologie (Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey, in press)Google Scholar; Lumsden, Charles J. and Wilson, Edward O., Genes, Mind, and Culture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

92 Fox, Robin, “Primate Kin and Human Kinship,” in Fox (fn. 8), 9–35Google Scholar; Leakey and Lewin (fn. 1), chap. 5; Alexander (fn. 13); Masters (fn. 30); Morin (fn. 89).

93 Cohen and Service (fn. 56).

94 Wilson (fn. 2), chap. 5; Thompson, Philip R., “And Who is My Neighbor? An Answer from Evolutionary Genetics,” Social Science Information, XIX (No. 2, 1980), 341–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95 Alexander (fn. 53). Cf. Carneiro, Robert L., “A Theory of the Origin of the State,” Science, Vol. 169 (August 21, 1970), 733–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

96 Willhoite, , “Reciprocity, Political Origins, and Legitimacy,” paper presented at 76th Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 1980Google Scholar; Willhoite (fn. 31); Rustow, Alexander, Freedom and Domination (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

97 Wittfogel, Karl, Oriental Despotism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957).Google Scholar For an example in the New World, see Turner, B. L. II, and Harrison, P. D., “Prehistoric Raised-Field Agriculture in the Maya Lowlands,” Science, Vol. 213 (July 24, 1981), 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

98 Eisenstadt, S. N., The Political Systems of Empires (London: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963).Google Scholar

99 Cohen and Service (fn. 56), 61.

100 Trivers (fn. 25); Willhoite (fn. 31); Corning, Peter, The Synergism Hypothesis: A Theory of Progressive Evolution (New York: McGraw-Hill, in press).Google Scholar

101 Homer, Iliad, Book IX; Mendelssohn, Kurt, The Riddle of the Pyramids (New York: Praeger, 1975), 148.Google Scholar For a striking illustration, see also Exod. 33:21–29. On the origin of writing as a system for ensuring credit for tax payments, see Schmandt-Besserat, Denise, “Decipherment of the Earliest Tablets,” Science, Vol. 221 (January 16, 1981), 283–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

102 Masters, Roger D., “Social Biology and the Welfare State,” in Tomasson, Richard F., ed., Comparative Social Research, Vol. VI (Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1983)Google Scholar, in press.

103 Marx, Karl, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, ed. by Struik, Dirk J. (New York: International, 1964), 143.Google Scholar

104 For a concrete example, compare Hirschman (fn. 39) with Masters, Roger D., “Exit, Voice, and Loyalty in Animal and Human Behavior,” Social Science Information, XV (December 1976), 78–85.Google Scholar On the limits of individual cost-benefit calculus, see Masters (fn. 26); Alexander and Borgia (fn. 27).

105 Masters (fn. 16, 1978; fn. 87; fn. 89); Masters, “The Duties of Humanity: Legal and Moral Obligation in Rousseau's Thought,” in Fred Eidlin, ed., Constitutional Democracy: Essays in Comparative Politics (forthcoming).

106 Durham, , “Coevolution and Law: The New Yam Festivals of West Africa,” paper presented to Symposium on Law and Behavioral Research, Monterey Dunes, Calif., September 25–27, 1981.Google Scholar

107 Alexander, Richard D. and others, “Sexual Dimorphisms and Breeding Systems in Pinnipeds, Ungulates, Primates, and Humans,” in Chagnon and Irons (fn. 8), 402–35.Google Scholar

108 Lovejoy (fn. 1); Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer and Bennett, William, “Lucy's Husband: What Did He Stand For?” Harvard Magazine, Vol. 83 (July-August 1981), 7–9, 46.Google Scholar

109 van den Berghe, Pierre L., Human Family Systems (New York: Elsevier, 1979).Google Scholar

110 Dickemann, Mildred, “The Ecology of Mating Systems in Hypergynous Dowry Societies,” Social Science Information, XVIII (No. 2, 1979), 163–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dickemann, , “Female Infanticide, Reproductive Strategies, and Social Stratification: A Preliminary Model,” in Chagnon and Irons (fn. 8), 321–67Google Scholar; Trivers, Robert L. and Willard, Daniel E., “Natural Selection of Parental Ability to Vary the Sex Ratio of Offspring,” Science, Vol. 179 (January 1973), 90–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

111 Roger D. Masters, “Explaining ‘Male Chauvinism’ and 'Feminism': Differences in Male and Female Reproductive Strategies,” Women and Politics, in press; Pettman, Ralph, Biopolitics and International Norms (New York: Pergamon, 1981).Google Scholar

112 Capra, Frijhof, The Tao of Physics (Berkeley, Calif.: Shambala, 1975).Google Scholar

113 Strauss (fn. 90), 4. Cf. Masters (fns. 26 and 105).