Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:32:09.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behavioralism in the Study of the United Nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Robert E. Riggs ,
Karen Feste Hanson ,
Mary Heinz ,
Barry B. Hughes  and
Thomas J. Volgy
Get access

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of behavioralism upon the study of the United Nations as reflected in journal articles published during the period 1950-1969.

Scope and Method of This Study

In recent years students of politics have become increasingly self-conscious about the spread of behavioral methods and viewpoints within the discipline. A great deal of energy has been expended in explaining what behavioralism is, defending it, attacking it, or trying to reconcile it with more traditional approaches.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , January 1970 , pp. 197 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alger, Chadwick F., “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” American Political Science Review, viii (June 1963).Google Scholar
Alger, Chadwick F., “Interaction in a Committee of the General Assembly,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, x (November 1966).Google Scholar
Alger, Chadwick F., “Non Resolution Consequences of die United Nations and Their Effect on International Conflict,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, v (June 1961).Google Scholar
Alger, Chadwick F., “United Nations Participation as a Learning Experience,” Public Opinion Quarterly, xxvii (Winter 1963).Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., “Dimensions of Conflict in the General Assembly,” American Political Science Review, LVIII (September 1964).Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., “The Long Road to International Relations Theory: Problems of Statistical Nonadditivity,” World Politics, xviii (July 1966).Google Scholar
*Aiker, Hayward R. Jr., and Russett, Bruce M., World Politics in the General Assembly (New Haven 1965).Google Scholar
*Almond, Gabriel A., and Coleman, James S., eds., The Politics of the Developing Areas (Princeton 1960).Google Scholar
Ball, Margaret M., “Bloc Voting in the General Assembly,” International Organization, v (February 1951).Google Scholar
Bennett, A. Leroy, “The Rejuvenation of the Security Council—Evidence and Reality,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, ix (November 1955).Google Scholar
*Bull, Hedley, “International Theory, the Case for a New Approach,” World Politics, xix (April 1966).Google Scholar
Bush, Henry C., “The United Nations as a Norm in British Opinion,” Public Opinion Quarterly, xviii (Winter 1955).Google Scholar
Chamberlin, Waldo, “The North Atlantic Bloc in the General Assembly,” Orbis, 1 (Winter 1958).Google Scholar
*Cory, Robert H. Jr., Communicating Information and Ideas about the United Nations to the American People (New York 1955).Google Scholar
Cory, Robert H. Jr., “Images of United States Disarmament Policy in the International Disarmament Negotiation System,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vii (September 1963).Google Scholar
Cory, Robert H. Jr., “The Role of Public Opinion in United States Policies Toward the United Nations,” International Organization, xi (Spring 1957).Google Scholar
*Gox, Robert W., “Education for Development,” International Organization, xxii (Winter 1968).Google Scholar
Dahl, Karl Nandrup, “The Role of I.L.O. Standards in the Global Integration Process,” Journal of Peace Research, v (no. 4 1968).Google Scholar
*Dahl, Robert A., “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest,” American Political Science Review, LV (December 1961).Google Scholar
*Easton, David, “The Current Meaning of ‘Behavioralism,’” in Charlesworth, James C., ed., Contemporary Political Analysis (New York 1967).Google Scholar
*Eulau, Heinz, The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics (New York 1963).Google Scholar
Galtung, Ingrid Eide, “The Status of the Technical Assistance Expert, A Study of UN Experts in Latin America,” Journal of Peace Research, iii (no. 4, 1966).Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan, “On the Effects of International Economic Sanctions, with Examples from the Case of Rhodesia,” World Politics, xix (April 1967).Google Scholar
Gregg, Robert W., “The Latin American Bloc in United Nations Elections,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, XLVI (September 1965).Google Scholar
Gross, Leo, “The Time Element in the Contentions Proceedings of the International Court of Justice,” American Journal of International Law, XLIII (January 1969). pp. 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guetzkow, Harold, “Isolation and Collaboration: A Partial Theory of Inter-Nation Relations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1 (March 1957).Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B., “International Integration: The European and the Universal Process,” International Organization, xv (Summer 1961).Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B., “System and Process in the International Labor Organization: A Statistical Afterthought,” World Politics, xiv (January 1962).Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B., “Types of Collective Security: An Examination of Operational Concepts,” American Political Science Review, XLIX (March 1955).Google Scholar
Haas, Michael, “A Functional Approach to International Organization,” Journal of Politics, xxvi (August 1965).Google Scholar
*Haas, Michael, “Bridge Building in International Relations, a Neo-Traditional Plea,” International Studies Quarterly, xi (December 1967).Google Scholar
Hanrieder, Wolfram, “International Organizations and International Systems,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (September 1966).Google Scholar
Hensley, Thomas R., “National Bias and die International Court of Justice,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, xii (November 1968).Google Scholar
Hero, Alfred O. Jr., “The American Public and the UN 1954-1966,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (December 1966).Google Scholar
Hoffman, Fredrik, “The Functions of Economic Sanctions: A Comparative Analysis,” Journal of Peace Research, iv (no. 2 1967).Google Scholar
Holsti, K. J., “Resolving International Conflicts: a Taxonomy of Behavior and Some Figures on Procedures,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (September 1966).Google Scholar
*Hovet, Thomas, Bloc Politics in the United Nations (Cambridge 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Harold Karan, “Deriving Data from Delegates to International Assemblies: A Research Note,” International Organization, xxi (Summer 1967).Google Scholar
Jensen, Lloyd, “Soviet-American Bargaining Behavior in the Postwar Disarmament Negotiations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, VII (September 1963).Google Scholar
*Kalleberg, Arthur L., “Concept Formation in Normative and Empirical Studies: Toward Reconciliation in Political Theory,” American Political Science Review, LXIII (March 1969).Google Scholar
*Kaplan, Morton A., “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations,” World Politics, xix (October 1966).Google Scholar
Kay, David A., “The Impact of African States on the U.N.,” International Organization, XXIII (Winter 1969).Google Scholar
Kay, David A., “The Politics of Decolonization: The New Nations and the United Nations,” International Organization, xxi (Autumn 1967).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., “The Study of Political Influence in the General Assembly,” International Organization, xxi (Spring 1967).Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., “Who Cares about the General Assembly,” International Organization, XXIII (Winter 1969).Google Scholar
*Kirkpatrick, Evron M., “The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science,” in Ranney, Austin, ed., Essays on the Behavioral Study of Politics (Urbana 1962).Google Scholar
Lande, Gabriella Rosner, “The Effect of Resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly,” World Politics, xix (July 1966).Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel, and Kramer, Marguerite N., “French Elite Perspectives on the United Nations,” International Organization, XVII (Winter 1963).Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, “The Analysis of Bloc Voting in the General Assembly: A Critique and a Proposal,” American Political Science Review, LVII (December 1963).Google Scholar
Manno, Catherine Senf, “Majority Decisions and Minority Responses in the UN General Assembly,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (March 1966).Google Scholar
Manno, Catherine Senf, “Problems and Trends in the Composition of Nonplenary UN Organs,” International Organization, xix (Winter 1965).Google Scholar
Manno, Catherine Senf, “Selective Weighted Voting in the UN General Assembly: Rationale and Methods,” International Organization, xx (Winter 1966).Google Scholar
*McCoy, Charles A., and Playford, John, eds., Apolitical Politics: A Critique of Behavioralism (New York 1967).Google Scholar
McDougal, Myres S., Lasswell, Harold A., and Chen, Lungche, “Human Rights and World Public Order: A Framework for Policy-Oriented Inquiry,” American Journal of International Law, LXIII (April 1969).Google Scholar
*Merton, Robert K., Social Theory and Social Structure (Rev. ed.) (Glencoe 1957).Google Scholar
Miles, Edward, “Organizations and Integration in International Systems,” International Studies Quarterly, xii (June 1968).Google Scholar
*Miller, James G., “Toward a General Theory for the Behavioral Sciences,” The American Psychologist, x (September 1955).Google Scholar
Mueller, John E., “Some Comments on Russett's ‘Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations,’” American Political Science Review, LXI (March 1967).Google Scholar
Padelford, Norman J., “Financing Peacekeeping: Politics and Crisis,” International Organization, xix (Summer 1965).Google Scholar
Peterson, Keith, “The Agendas of the General Assembly: A Content Analysis,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, xxxix (December 1958).Google Scholar
Peterson, Keith, “The Business of the U.N. Security Council: History and Prospects,” Journal of Politics, xxvii (November 1965).Google Scholar
*Peterson, Keith, “The Uses of the United Nations,” Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, XLIV (June 1963).Google Scholar
*Peterson, Keith, “The Uses of the Uniting for Peace Resolution Since 1950,” International Organization, xiii (Spring 1959).Google Scholar
Power, Paul F., “American Employer Behavior in the International Labor Organization,” Midwest Journal of Political Science, XII (May 1968).Google Scholar
Rieselbach, Leroy N., “Quantitative Techniques for Studying Voting Behavior in the UN General Assembly,” International Organization, xiv (Spring 1960).Google Scholar
*Riggs, Robert E., Politics in the United Nations (Urbana 1958).Google Scholar
Riggs, Robert E., “The United Nations as an Influence on United States Policy,” International Studies Quarterly, xi (March 1967).Google Scholar
Rohn, Peter H., “The United Nations Treaty Series Project,” International Studies Quarterly, xii (June 1968).Google Scholar
Roper, Elmo, “American Attitudes on World Organization,” Public Opinion Quarterly, XVII (Winter 1954).Google Scholar
*Rosenau, James M., “Games International Relations Scholars Play,” Journal of International Affairs, xxi (no. 2, 1967).Google Scholar
Rosenne, Shabtai, “The International Court and the United Nations: Reflections on the Period 1946-1954,” International Organization, ix (May 1955).Google Scholar
Rowe, Edward T., “The Emerging Anti-Colonial Consensus in the United Nations,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, viii (November 1964).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., “Discovering Voting Groups in the United Nations,” American Political Science Review, LX (June 1966).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., International Regions and the International System: A Study in Political Ecology (Chicago 1967).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., “Toward a Model of Competitive International Politics,” Journal of Politics, xxv (May 1963), pp. 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, William A., “Correlates of International Attitudes,” Public Opinion Quarterly, xxii (Winter 1959).Google Scholar
*Scott, William A., and Withey, Stephen B., The United States and the United Nations: The Public View 1954-1955 (New York 1958).Google Scholar
Sens, Andrew D., “The Newly Independent States, the United Nations, and Some Thoughts on the Nature of the Development Process,” Journal of Politics, xxx (February 1968).Google Scholar
Shihata, Ibrahim F. I., “The Attitude of New States Toward the International Court of Justice,” International Organization, xix (Spring 1965).Google Scholar
*Sibley, Mulford Q., “The Limitations of Behavioralism,” in Charlesworth, James C., ed., Contemporary Political Analysis (New York 1967).Google Scholar
Simon, Sheldon W., “The Asian States and the I.L.O.: New Problems in International Consensus,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, x (March 1966).Google Scholar
*Singer, J. David, “The Relevance of the Behavioral Sciences to the Study of International Relations,” Behavioral Science, vi (October 1961).Google Scholar
Singer, Marshall R., and Sensenig, Barton III, “Election Within the United Nations: An Experimental Study Utilizing Statistical Analysis,” International Organization, XVII (Autumn 1963).Google Scholar
Suchman, Edward A., Goldsen, Rose K., and Williams, Robin M. Jr., “Attitudes Toward the Korean War,” Public Opinion Quarterly, xvi (Summer 1953).Google Scholar
Suh, Il Ro, “Voting Behavior of National Judges in International Courts,” American Journal of International Law, LXIII (April 1969).Google Scholar
*Thompson, Kenneth W., “The Internationalists Dilemma: Relevance and Rigor,” International Studies Quarterly, xii (June 1968).Google Scholar
Todd, James, “An Analysis of Security Council Voting Behavior,” Western Political Quarterly, xxii (March 1969).Google Scholar
Van Wagenen, Richard W., “American Defense Officials’ Views on the U.N.,” Western Political Quarterly, xiv (March 1961).Google Scholar
Van Wagenen, Richard W., “The Concept of Community and the Future of the United Nations,” International Organization, xix (Summer 1965).Google Scholar
Vincent, Jack E., “National Attributes as Predictors of Delegate Attitudes at the United Nations,” American Political Science Review, LXII (September 1968).Google Scholar
Weigert, Kathleen Maas, and Riggs, Robert E., “African and United Nations Elections: An Aggregate Data Analysis,” International Organization, xxiii (Winter 1969).Google Scholar
*Wormuth, Francis D., “Matched Dependent Behavioralism: The Cargo Cult in Political Science,” Western Political Quarterly, xx (December 1967).Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, “The Mode of Financing Unions of States as a Measure of their Degree of Integration,” International Organization, xi (Winter 1957).Google Scholar
*Young, Oran R., “The United Nations and the International System,” International Organization, xxii (Autumn 1968).Google Scholar