No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2011
1 A good survey of the disarmament literature of this period can be found in Tate, Merze, The Disarmament Illusion: The Movement for a Limitation of Armaments to 1907, New York, 1942.Google Scholar
2 White, Andrew D., The First Hague Conference, Boston, World Peace Foundation, 1912.Google Scholar
3 This effort has been analyzed in Boggs, Marion W., Attempts to Define and Limit “Aggressive” Armament in Diplomacy and Strategy, University of Missouri Studies, XVI, No. 1, Columbia, Mo., 1941.Google Scholar
4 Yefimov, S., “Disarmament or the Arms Race?”, International Affairs, No. 2 (February 1962), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar This review also criticizes the volume edited by Brennan as being generally opposed to disarmament.
5 This crucial question about total disarmament has been developed incisively in Schelling's, Thomas C. recent article, “The Role of Deterrence in Total Disarmament,” Foreign Affairs, XL (April 1962), pp. 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Clark, Grenville and Sohn, Louis B., World Peace Through World Law, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.Google Scholar
7 This connection has been analyzed in Zoppo, Ciro E., The Issue of Nuclear Test Cessation at the London Disarmament Conference of 1957: A Study in East-West Negotiation, Santa Monica, Calif., The RAND Corporation, Research Memorandum 2821, 1961.Google Scholar