Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:35:26.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moral Development and Political Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

Richard. W. Wilson
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science at Rutgers University.
Get access

Abstract

Since World War II, a number of advances have been made in theories of revolution and political change. One approach not yet utilized is moral development theory, which adds a normative dimension to existing structural and psychological concepts. In this paper, moral development variables are related to the positive and negative rights that modern men seek within the dominance structures in which they live. Dominance patterns may become perverted due to social change and the amoral behavior of dominant individuals. Political movements characterized by demands for positive or negative rights arise as a reaction to these perversions. Whether change is restorative, accommodative, or transformative depends upon the subsequent patterns of interaction among individuals who are amoral, allegiant, or morally mature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bienen, , Violence and Social Change: A Review of Current Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).Google Scholar Additional useful works not otherwise cited are Almond, Gabriel A., Flanagan, Scott C., and Mundt, Robert J., eds., Crisis, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973)Google Scholar; Apter, David E. and Goodman, Louis Wolf, eds., The Multinational Corporation and Social Change (New York: Praeger, 1976)Google Scholar; Cardoso, Fernando Henrique and Faletto, Enzo, Dependency and Development in Latin America, trans. by Urquidi, Marjory Mattingly (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979)Google Scholar; Dahl, Robert A., Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Hagen, Everett, On the Theory of Social Change: How Economic Growth Begins (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Lindblom, Charles E., Politics and Markets: The World's Political-Economic Systems (New York: Basic Books, 1977)Google Scholar; Migdal., Joel S., Peasants, Politics, and Revolution: Pressures Toward Political and Social Change in the Third World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Moore, Barrington Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966)Google Scholar; Olson, Mancur Jr, The Logic of Collective Action, rev. ed. (New York: Schocken, 1971)Google Scholar; Paige, Jeffrey M., Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World (New York: Free Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Salert, Barbara, Revolutions and Revolutionaries: Four Theories (New York: Elsevier, 1976)Google Scholar; Scott, James C., The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1976)Google Scholar; Trimberger, Kay Ellen, Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1978)Google Scholar; and Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York and London: Academic Press, 1974).Google Scholar

2 Eckstein, , “On the Etiology of Internal Wars,” History and Theory 4 (No. 2, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Stone, , “Theories of Revolution,” World Politics 18 (January 1966), 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Eisenstadt, S. N., Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations (New York: Free Press, 1978), 7.Google Scholar

5 Goldstone, Jack A., “Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation,” World Politics 32 (April 1980), 425–29, 448–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 Sorokin, Pitirim A., The Crisis of Our Age: The Social and Cultural Outlook (New York: Dutton, 1941)Google Scholar; Brinton, Crane, The Anatomy of Revolution (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1952)Google Scholar; Davies, James C., Human Nature in Politics: The Dynamics of Political Behavior (New York and London: Wiley, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gurr, Ted, Why Men Rebel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1970)Google Scholar; Johnson, Chalmers, Revolutionary Change (Boston: Little, Brown, 1966)Google Scholar; Smelser, Neil J., Theory of Collective Behavior (New York: Free Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Eisenstadt (fn. 4); Skocpol, Theda, States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1968), 266–67Google Scholar; also, Eckstein, Harry, “Introduction. Toward the Theoretical Study of Internal War,” in Eckstein, , ed., Internal War: Problems and Approaches (New York: Free Press, 1964), 12.Google Scholar

8 Eisenstadt (fn. 4), 202, 218–19.

9 Eckstein, (fn. 2), 153.

10 Skinner, B. F., Beyond Freedom and Dignity (New York: Knopf, 1971), 109, 112–13.Google Scholar

11 Kohlberg, Lawrence, “From Is to Ought: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral Development,” in Mischel, Theodore, ed., Cognitive Development and Epistemology (New York: Academic Press, 1971), 213.Google Scholar

12 Piaget, , The Moral Judgment of the Child (New York: Collier Books, 1962).Google Scholar

13 Kohlberg, Lawrence, “Development of Children's Orientations Toward a Moral Order” in Sprinthall, Richard C. and Sprinthall, Norman A., eds., Educational Psychology (New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1969)Google Scholar; Kohlberg, , “Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive Developmental Approach to Socialization” in Goslin, David A., ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969).Google Scholar

14 Kohlberg, Lawrence and Candee, Dan, “Relationships Between Moral Judgment and Moral Action,” mimeo (Cambridge: Harvard University, December 15, 1979), 514, 18, 30, 46–47.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., 47–48, 58–59.

16 Gilligan, Carol and Murphy, John M., “From Adolescence to Adulthood: The Moral Dilemmas of Reconciliation to Reality,” Moral Education Forum 4 (Winter 1979), 313.Google Scholar See also Merelman, Richard M., “The Development of Political Ideology: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Socialization,” American Political Science Review 63 (September 1969), 762CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Fishkin, James, “Relativism, Liberalism, and Moral Development,” in Wilson, Richard W. and Schochet, Gordon J., eds., Moral Development and Politics (New York: Praeger, 1980), 85106.Google Scholar

17 Rest, , “New Approaches in the Assessment of Moral Judgment” in Lickona, Thomas, ed., Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976), 198218.Google Scholar

18 Pervin, Lawrenc. A., Current Controversies and Issues in Personality (New York: Wiley, 1978), 14.Google Scholar

19 Reid, Herbert G. and Yanarella, Ernest J., “The Tyranny of the Categorical: On Kohlberg and the Politics of Moral Development” in Wilson and Schochet (fn. 16), 107–32.Google Scholar

20 Kohlberg, Lawrence, “The Future of Liberalism as the Dominant Ideology of the Western World” in Kohlberg, , ed., The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice, Vol. 1 (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1981), 231–42.Google Scholar (First published in Proceedings of the Annenberg Conference on the Future of the West (Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center for the Study of the American Experience, 1977).

21 Wilson, Richard W., “Political Socialization and Moral Development,” World Politics 33 (January 1981), 153–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Merelman (fn. 16), 756, 759–61, 764–65.

23 Cohn, Norman, The Pursuit of the Millennium (New York: Harper, 1961), 308.Google Scholar

24 Davies (fn. 6), 350.

25 Kornhauser, William, “Rebellion and Political Development” in Eckstein (fn. 7), 151–55.Google Scholar

26 Beitz, Charles R., “Economic Rights and Distributive Justice in Developing Societies,” World Politics 33 (April 1981), 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Berlin, Isaiah, Two Concepts of Liberty (London: Oxford University Press, 1958), 11, 15, 16.Google Scholar

28 Sennett, Richard, Authority (New York: Knopf, 1980), 25.Google Scholar

29 Davies (fn. 6), 45–49; Amdur, Robert, “Rawls' Theory of Justice: Domestic and International Perspectives,” World Politics 29 (April 1977), 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lane, Robert E., “Motives for Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: The Effects of Market and State,” Political Psychology 1 (Autumn 1979), 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sennett, Richard and Cobb, Jonathan, The Hidden Injuries of Class (New York: Knopf, 1972), 121, 191Google Scholar; Peters, Richard, “The Place of Kohlberg's Theory in Moral Education,” Journal of Moral Education 7 (May 1978), 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Aristotle, Politica, Book III, chap. 6, in McKeon, Richard, ed., Introduction to Aristotle (New York: Random House, Modern Library, 1947), 590.Google Scholar

31 Eisenstadt (fn. 4), 41–42.

32 Brinton (fn. 6), reproduced in part in Eckstein, Harry and Apter, David E., eds., Comparative Politics: A Reader (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1963), 558–59.Google Scholar

33 Aya, Rod, “Theories of Revolution Reconsidered: Contrasting Models of Collective Violence,” Theory and Society 8 (June-December 1979), 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Arendt, , On Revolution (New York: Viking, 1963), 66.Google Scholar

35 Apter, , The Politics of Modernization (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1965), 14.Google Scholar

36 Feldman, Arnold S., “Violence and Volatility: The Likelihood of Revolution” in Eckstein (fn. 7), 125.Google Scholar

37 Eisenstadt (fn. 4), 43.

38 Salert (fn. 1), 30–37 (from the work of Mancur Olson, Jr., fn. 1).

39 Moore, Barrington Jr, “Revolution in America?” in Katope, Christopher and Zolbrod, Paul, eds., The Rhetoric of Revolution (Toronto: Macmillan, 1970), 544.Google Scholar

40 Brinton, in Eckstein and Apter (fn. 32), 557.

41 Skocpol (fn. 6), 27.

42 Tilly, Charles, Tilly, Louise, and Tilly, Richard, The Rebellious Century: 1830–1930 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

43 I am indebted to Thomas A. Metzger for introducing me to these concepts.

44 Merelman (fn. 16), 750–67.

45 Waterman, Harvey, “Insecure ‘Ins’ and Opportune ‘Outs’: Sources of Collective Political Activity,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 8 (Spring 1980), III.Google Scholar

46 Davies (fn. 6), 45.

47 Mazlish, Bruce, The Revolutionary Ascetic: Evolution of a Political Type (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976).Google Scholar

48 Tilly, Tilly, and Tilly (fn. 42), 295.

49 Huntington (fn. 7), 270.

50 Haan, N., Smith, M. B., and Block, J., “The Moral Reasoning of Young Adults: Political-Social Behavior, Family Background and Personality Correlates,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10 (1968), 183201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

51 Merelman (fn. 16), 755–56.

52 Hoffer, Eric, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York: Harper & Row, 1951), 98.Google Scholar

53 Cited in Johnson (fn. 6), xiv.