Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:27:43.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Military and the Conduct of Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

Richard D. Challener
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This reviewer would, for instance, like to dissent from Vagts' view that America's entry into both world wars can be considered in terms of the waging of preventive war—one of the “undeclared motivations,” according to the author. Further criticism might also be directed against his easy assumption of the general revisionist approach to F.D.R.'s pre-1941 diplomacy. His general thesis is close to that of his father-in-law, the late Charles A. Beard, and includes the usual out-of-context quotations from Stim-son's On Active Service. Vagts at least seems to believe that America fought the right war with the right enemies and engages in none of the polemics or painful moralizing of most of the revisionists. It is also open to question whether the few examples which he gives of the role of the military in pre-1917 American foreign policy do not present a misleading picture. In these matters he does seem to be guilty of carrying European stereotypes across the Atlantic.

2 History of Militarism, p. 12.