Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:23:46.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Once More Unto the Breach: In Defence of Class Analysis Yet Again

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

David Rose
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, England
Get access

Abstract

I am grateful to Blackburn and Prandy for their responses to the book Constructing Classes (Rose and O'Reilly 1997) and the paper ’Changing Employment Relations...?’ The former reported on progress made by mid-1997 in producing a new official social classification schema for the U.K. As such it offered only an interim version of the proposed new schema. The WES paper, using this interim schema, was intended only as a modest contribution to the debate on labour market ‘flexibility’ and its supposed effects. As is made clear in the conclusions to the paper, we do not regard the data presented there as providing anything other than prima facie evidence that, notwithstanding recent labour market changes, classes can still be distinguished using employment relations criteria. I readily concede that neither the individual level survey data used in the paper nor its very simple analyses could possibly provide conclusive evidence.

Type
COMMENTARY
Copyright
© 1998 BSA Publications Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)