Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:48:53.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status of Research and Publications on Weed Losses and Costs and Benefits of Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Weeds , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 1966 , pp. 393 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agricultural Research Service. 1965. Losses in agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agr. Handbook No. 291. 120 pp.Google Scholar
2. Agricultural Research Service and Federal Extension Service. 1962. A survey of extent and cost of weed control and specific weed problems. ARS 34–23. 65 pp.Google Scholar
3. Agricultural Research Service and Federal Extension Service. 1965. A survey of extent and cost of weed control and specific weed problems. ARS 34–23–1. 78 pp.Google Scholar
4. California State Chamber of Commerce. 1964. Rept. of Statewide Weed Control Comm. 39 pp. illus. Google Scholar
5. Dunham, R. S. 1964. Losses from weeds. Minnesota Agr. Ext. Serv. Spec. Rept. No. 13. 43 pp.Google Scholar
6. Expanded Project for Aquatic Plant Control. 1965. Progress Report. 89th Congress, 1st Session, House Document No. 251. 145 pp. illus. Google Scholar
7. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Knake, Ellery L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberii with corn and soybeans. WEEDS 10:26–29.Google Scholar
9. Parsons, Philip S. and McHenry, W. B. 1964. Cost of controlling aquatic weeds in California Irrigation Canals. Proc. 16th Ann. California Weed Conf. Google Scholar
10. Pavlychenko, T. K., and Harrington, J. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. T. Res. 10:77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Southern Weed Conference Research Committee. 1962. Tentative Category H—Economic data on losses due to weeds. Res. Rept. SWC. pp. 167–169.Google Scholar
12. Southern Weed Conference Research Committee. 1963. Category H—Economic data on losses due to weeds. Southern Weed Conference Res. Rept. SWC. pp 121–145.Google Scholar
13. Staniforth, D. W. 1962. Responses of soybean varieties to weed competition. Agron. J. 54:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Timmons, F. L. 1960. Weed control in western irrigation and drainage systems. ARS 34–14, a joint report of the Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dept. of Agr. and the Bur. of Reclam., U.S. Dept. of Inter. 22 pp. illus.Google Scholar
15. United States Chamber of Commerce Agricultural Services Department Committee. 1930. A suggested program of weed research and control. 27 pp.Google Scholar
16. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:410–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar