Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:49:25.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Surfactants in the Foliar Absorption of Indole–3–Acetic Acid (IAA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. E. Hughes  and
V. H. Freed
R. E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Oregon State College, Corvallis
V. H. Freed
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Oregon State College, Corvallis
Get access

Extract

The absorption of chemicals by the leaf of a plant is a problem of major importance in chemical weed control. The presence of a waxy cuticle on the surface presents a barrier to absorption. Interspersed in the cuticle are the stomata which may serve as a portal of entry for chemicals but even the interior chambers of the stoma are lined with a cuticle. It may be presumed that the more intimate the contact between a chemical and the leaf surface the greater the possibility for absorption. The water carrier commonly used in application of these chemicals makes but a poor contact with the cuticle; however, this deficiency may be overcome by the addition of agents to lower the surface tension of the solution. While intimacy of contact of the chemical with the leaf surface is important in absorption, the state, i.e. liquid or solid, of the chemical may also influence the ease of absorption. Consideration of the physical processes involved shows that a chemical will be absorbed with relative ease from a liquid phase in contrast to the same chemical deposited as a crystal on the surface of the leaf. Either humid conditions following application or the addition of hygroscopic agents may help to maintain a liquid state thus facilitating absorption. Many surface active agents used in sprays are also fair hygroscopic agents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 1961 , pp. 54 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrier, G. E., and Loomis, W. E. The absorption and translocation of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and P32 by leaves. Plant Physiology 32:225–231. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bowman, R. L., Caulfield, P. A., Udenfriend, S. Spectrophotometric assay in the ultraviolet. Science 122:32–33. 1955.Google Scholar
3. Brown, Lamar C. Chemical defoliation of cotton VII. Effectiveness of adjuvants under several specific plant and environmental conditions. Agron. Jour. 49:563–566. 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dorschner, K. P., and Buchholtz, K. P. Wetting of aqueous herbicidal sprays as a factor influencing stands of alfalfa seedlings. Agron. Jour. 48:59–63. 1956.Google Scholar
5. Freed, V. H., and Montgomery, Marvin. The effect of surfactants on foliar absorption of 3–amino–1,2,3–triazole. Weeds 6:386–389. 1958.Google Scholar
6. Gray, Reed A. Increasing the absorption of streptomycin by leaves and flowers with glycerol. Phytopathology 46:105–111. 1956.Google Scholar
7. Hamence, J. H. Fluorescence test for β-indoleacetic acid. Analyst 68:13–14. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harley, C. P., Moon, H. H., and Regimbal, L. O. Effects of the additive Tween 20 and relatively low temperatures on apple thinning by naphthaleneacetic acid sprays. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 69:21–27. 1957.Google Scholar
9. Horie, Kakuro. Permeation of urea into leaf cells. II. Absorption of urea in the dark. Sci. Rpts. Hyogo. Univ. Agri., Ser. Agri. 2:183–186. 1956.Google Scholar
10. Hauser, E. W. Absorption of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by soybean and corn plants. Agron. Jour. 47:32–36. 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Smith, Allen E., Eukel, J. W., Stone, G. M., and Riddell, J. A. Factors affecting the performance of maleic hydrazide. Jour. Agr. Food Chem. 7:341–344. 1959.Google Scholar
12. Volk, R., and McAuliffe, C. Factors affecting the foliar absorption of N15 labeled urea by tobacco. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 18:308–312. 1954.Google Scholar