Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:32:21.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Movement and Persistence of Picloram in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald E. Herr
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
E. W. Stroube
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Dale A. Ray
Affiliation:
Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio
Get access

Abstract

Surface applications of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) were made at 5 rates on 3 soil types. The picloram-treated areas were sampled 3 times after herbicidal application to determine the extent and movement of herbicide residues. The region of highest picloram concentration in a heavy- and medium-textured soil, when sampled 9 and 15 months after application, was near the surface. On the light-textured soil, picloram moved more completely through the surface 2 ft of soil with greatest herbicide concentrations generally found at the deepest sampling depth. Applications of picloram were dissipated faster at low rather than at high rates on all 3 soil types. Concentrations of phytotoxic residues at the end of the study period were greatest in the heavy-textured soil with the highest organic content.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alexander, M. and Aleem, M. I. H. 1961. Effect of chemical structure on microbial decomposition of aromatic herbicides. J. Agr. and Food Chem. 9:4447.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Sheets, T. J. 1959. The relationship of soil adsorption of EPTC to oats injury in various soil types. Weeds 7:8890.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C., Schmidt, E. L., and Behrens, R. 1961. Dissipation of simazine from the soil. Weeds 9:477484.Google Scholar
4. Davis, F. L., Selman, F. L., and Davis, D. E. 1954. Some factors affecting the behavior of dinitro herbicides in soils. Proc. SWC 7:205207.Google Scholar
5. Friesen, G. 1965. Wild buckwheat control with Tordon. Down to Earth 20(4):910.Google Scholar
6. Goring, C. A. I., Youngson, C. R., and Hamaker, J. W. 1965. Tordon herbicide … disappearance from soils. Down to Earth 20(4):35.Google Scholar
7. Hurtt, W., Meade, J. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1958. The effect of various factors on the movement of CIPC in certain soils. Weeds 6:425431.Google Scholar
8. Lanning, E. R. Jr. 1963. Tordon—For the control of deeprooted perennial herbaceous weeds in the Western States. Down to Earth 19(1):35.Google Scholar
9. Mitich, L. 1964. Leafy spurge control with chemicals. Res. Rept. NCWCC 21:11.Google Scholar
10. Roadhouse, F. E. B. and Birk, L. A. 1961. Penetration of and persistence in soil of the herbicide 2-chloro-4-,6-bis (ethylamino) s-triazine. Can. J. Plant Sci. 41:252260.Google Scholar
11. Sheets, T. J. 1958. The comparative toxicities of four phenyurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413424.Google Scholar
12. Sheets, T. J., Kearney, P. C., and Smith, J. W. 1964. Volatilization of seven s-triazine herbicides. Weeds 12:8386.Google Scholar
13. Upchurch, R. P. and Pierce, W. C. 1957. The leaching of monuron from Lakeland sand soil. Part I. The effect of amount, intensity and frequency of simulated rainfall. Weeds 5:321330.Google Scholar