Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:35:54.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Various Components on the Effectiveness of 2,4,5-T Sprays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard Behrens
Richard Behrens*
Affiliation:
Field Crops Research Branch, ARS, USDA, Department of Plant Physiology and Pathology, Texas A. & M. College, College Station, Texas
Get access

Extract

Many factors influence the effectiveness of a herbicidal spray. The importance of some, such as herbicide formulation and carrier, has been demonstrated, while the influence of others is either in doubt or has not been established. Since selective herbicides are being applied as sprays to millions of acres annually, more information on factors influencing their effectiveness in spray applications would be of value.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1957 , pp. 183 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Behrens, R. The effect of herbicide droplet size and other variables on mesquite control. Texas Agric. Aviation Conf., Fifth Annual, Sect. D, pp. 1–4. 1956.Google Scholar
2. Behrens, R., Fisher, C. E., and Meadors, C. H. Response of mesquite seedlings to 2,4,5-T as influenced by droplet size and spray volume. Proc. Southern Weed Conference, p. 166. 1956.Google Scholar
3. Buchholtz, K. P. Some factors affecting the tolerance of peas to MCP and other growth regulating herbicides. Weeds 3:331–341. 1954.Google Scholar
4. Davis, G. E., and Smith, O. Physiological studies of the toxicity of 2,4-D. Proc. Northeastern Weed Control Conf., pp. 92–101. 1950.Google Scholar
5. Dayhoff, E. E. The influence of droplet size upon the effectiveness of herbicidal application of 2,4–D in beans. M. S. Thesis, Texas A & M College, College Station, Texas. pp. 1–31. 1956.Google Scholar
6. Ennis, W. B., and Williamson, R. E. Studies on the influence of droplet size upon the inhibitory effectiveness of growth regulating sprays. (Abstr.) Ann. Meetings of the Amer. Soc. Agron., p. 31. 1951.Google Scholar
7. Ennis, W. B., and Dorschner, K. P. Studies on spray retention by leaves of different plants. Weeds 1:274–286. 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Fisher, C. E., and Young, D. W. The effect of herbicide droplet size on the control of mesquite when applied by airplane equipment. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf., pp. 84–86. 1950.Google Scholar
9. Hellquist, A. H. Spraying technique and the use of chemical weed killers. Vaxtodling 7:78–94. 1952.Google Scholar
10. Hull, H. M. Studies on herbicidal absorption and translocation in velvet mesquite seedlings. Weeds 4:22–42. 1956.Google Scholar
11. Linder, P. L., Brown, J. W., and Mitchell, J. W. Movement of externally applied phenoxy compounds in bean plants in relation to conditions favoring carbohydrate translocation. Bot. Gaz. 110:628–632. 1949.Google Scholar
12. Mitchell, J. W., and Brown, J. W. Movement of 2,4-D acid stimulus and its relation to translocation of organic food materials in plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:393–407. 1946.Google Scholar
13. Mullison, W. R. The effect of droplet size upon herbicidal effectiveness of plant growth regulators. Down to Earth 9 (2): 11–13. 1953.Google Scholar
14. Rice, E. L. Absorption and translocation of ammonium 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate by bean plants. Bot. Gaz. 109:301–314. 1948.Google Scholar
15. Roth, G. A., and Reins, G. E. Rotating disc apparatus for the production of droplets of uniform size. Weeds (In press).Google Scholar
16. Sexsmith, J. J. Effect on canning peas of amine 2,4-D and MCP applied at different rates and spray volumes. Res. Report, North Central Weed Control Conf., p. 80. 1954.Google Scholar
17. Smith, H. H. Quantitative aspects of aqueous spray applications of 2,4-D acid for herbicidal purposes. Bot. Gaz. 107:544–551. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Weintraub, R. L., and Brown, J. W. Translocation of exogenous growth regulators in the bean seedling. Plant Phys. 25:140–149. 1950.Google Scholar