Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:43:28.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Monuron on C14O2 Fixation by Red Kidney Bean Leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Floyd M. Ashton ,
Ernest G. Uribe  and
Gunter Zweig
Floyd M. Ashton
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Ernest G. Uribe
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Gunter Zweig
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Get access

Extract

Monuron [3–(p–chlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea] is reported to be a potent inhibitor of the Hill reaction by Cooke and Wessels and van der Veen. It is reported to be 125 times as active as phenylurethan [ethyl–N–phenylcarbamate] in inhibiting the Hill reaction. Diuron [3–(3,4–dichlorophenyl)–1,1–dimethylurea] is 2500 times as active as phenylurethan as a Hill reaction inhibitor. Monuron and diuron have been used in photosynthetic studies. There are no reports in the literature indicating a difference in the mode of action of these compounds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1961 , pp. 575 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M., Zweig, G., and Mason, G. W. The effect of certain triazines on C14O2 fixation in red kidney beans. Weeds 8:448–457. 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Benson, A. A., Bassham, J. A., Calvin, M., Goodale, T. C., Hass, U. A., and Steppa, W. The path of carbon in photosynthesis. V. Paper chromatography and radioautography of the products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72:170–178. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bishop, N. I. The influence of the herbicide, DCMU, on the oxygen evolving system of photosynthesis. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 27:205. 1958.Google Scholar
4. Block, R. J., Durrum, A. R., and Zweig, G. Manual of paper chromatography and paper electrophoresis. Second Edition, pp. 710. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
5. Cooke, Anson R. A possible mechanism of action of the urea type herbicides. Weeds 4:397–398. 1956.Google Scholar
6. Jagendorf, A. T. The relationship between electron transport and phosphorylation in spinach chloroplasts. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology No. 11:236–257. 1958.Google Scholar
7. Jagendorf, A. T. and Margulies, M. Effect of CMU on spinach chloroplasts photophosphorylation. Federation Proc. 19:328. 1960.Google Scholar
8. Vernon, L. P., and Zaugg, W. S. Photoreduction by fresh and aged chloroplasts: requirement for ascorbate and 2,6–dicholorophenol–indophenol with aged chloroplasts. J. of Biol. Chem. 235:2728. 1960.Google Scholar
9. Wessels, J. S. C., and Veen, R. van der. The action of some derivatives of phenylurethan and of 3–phenyl–1,1–dimethylurea on the Hill reaction. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta 19:548–9. 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar