Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T04:00:19.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evaluation of the Herbicidal Efficiency of Combinations of ATA with Dalapon, Monuron, and Several Other Chemicals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Sheets  and
O. A. Leonard
T. J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA, Botany Dept., University of California, Davis
O. A. Leonard
Affiliation:
The Expt. Station, University of California, Davis
Get access

Extract

In many areas of the southwestern states where cotton is a major crop, the use of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4–D) is hazardous. Its use is restricted by law in many localities during the growing season. In these areas many perennial broad-leaved weeds which are susceptible to 2,4–D, at least to some degree, grow in abundance. Because of extreme arid conditions and other factors these weeds have not responded favorably to soil sterilants. There is urgent need for more effective herbicides for these weeds.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 143 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, L. E. Chemical control of Johnson grass. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. pp. 39–40. 1955.Google Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S., and Reiber, H. G. Studies on the activation of herbicides. Hilgardia 16:487–500. 1945.Google Scholar
3. Foy, C. L., and Miller, J. H. Chemical control of Johnson grass. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. pp. 197–203. 1956.Google Scholar
4. Hauser, E. W., and Thompson, J. T. Effects of 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole and derivatives on nutgrass and Johnson grass. Agric. and Food Chem. 2:680–681. 1954.Google Scholar
5. Hauser, E. W., and Thompson, J. T. Progress report on control of established Johnson grass with chemicals and cropping. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. pp. 190–196. 1956.Google Scholar
6. Ingle, M., Lee, O. C., and Hart, R. D. The effect of herbicide combinations on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.). Res. Report, North Central Weed Control Conf. p. 4. 1956.Google Scholar
7. Meyers, W. A., Beatty, R. H., and Allen, W. W. Progress report on amizol (3–amino–1,2,4–triazole) on woody plants. Proc. Northeastern Weed Control Conf. pp. 202–205. 1956.Google Scholar
8. Pavlychenko, T. K. Amino triazole in controlling perennial weeds. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. pp. 37–39. 1955.Google Scholar
9. Raleigh, S. M. Quackgrass control. Proc. Northeastern Weed Control Conf. pp. 305–307. 1956.Google Scholar
10. Shaw, W. C., and Swanson, C. R. Techniques and equipment used in evaluating chemicals for their herbicidal properties. Weeds 1:352–365. 1952.Google Scholar
11. Tafuro, A. J., and Beatty, R. H. Progress report with greenhouse tests on Johnson grass seedlings using amizol (3–amino–1,2,4–triazole) as an additive with other herbicides. Proc. Southern Weed Conf. pp. 386–391. 1955.Google Scholar
12. Vengris, Jonas. Chemical control of quackgrass. Proc. Northeastern Weed Control Conf. pp. 241–245. 1956.Google Scholar