Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:51:17.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woolly Cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) Management in Corn (Zea mays) by Sequential Herbicide Applications and Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James A. Mickelson  and
R. Gordon Harvey
James A. Mickelson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in southern Wisconsin from 1996 to 1998 to evaluate the effects of acetochlor applied preemergence (PRE) followed by nicosulfuron or sethoxydim applied postemergence (POST) and of cultivation on woolly cupgrass control, corn grain yield, and woolly cupgrass seed production. Sethoxydim treatments provided greater woolly cupgrass control than nicosulfuron treatments in 1997 and similar control to nicosulfuron treatments in 1996 and 1998. However, neither herbicide killed all emerged woolly cupgrass plants, regardless of herbicide rate or POST application timing. Late postemergence treatments provided greater season-long control than early postemergence treatments in 1996 and 1998, but there was no difference in control between timings in 1997. Acetochlor applied PRE at 1,800 g ai/ha (1×) followed by nicosulfuron (35 g ai/ha) or sethoxydim (213 g ai/ha) at the registered rate (1×) or at one half of the registered rate (0.5×) consistently provided sufficient woolly cupgrass control to maximize corn yield, regardless of cultivation or POST herbicide application timing. Acetochlor PRE treatments, cultivated and noncultivated, followed by sethoxydim POST and cultivated acetochlor PRE treatments followed by nicosulfuron POST treatments provided sufficient control in each year to limit woolly cupgrass seed production to a level that decreased the predicted future seedbank density, regardless of herbicide rate or POST herbicide application timing. However, noncultivated acetochlor treatments followed by nicosulfuron applied at 1× followed by 0.5× or at 0.5× followed by 0.5× did not consistently reduce seed production to a level that decreased the predicted future seedbank density. These results suggest that the rate of sethoxydim can be reduced to 0.5× if a full rate of acetochlor is applied PRE with little effect on corn yield or woolly cupgrass seedbank density. However, reducing the rate of nicosulfuron to 0.5× following an application of acetochlor at the full rate or reducing both the acetochlor and nicosulfuron or sethoxydim rate to 0.5× is recommended only if a cultivation is planned.

Keywords

Acetochlornicosulfuronsethoxydimwoolly cupgrass, Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth #3 ERBVIcorn, Zea mays L. ‘DeKalb SR404’, ‘DeKalb DK493SR’Acetochlor, herbicide rate, herbicide application timing, nicosulfuron, sethoxydim, sethoxydim-resistant corn, woolly cupgrass seed productionCOC, crop oil concentrateDAT, days after treatmentEPOST, early postemergenceLPOST, late postemergenceOM, organic matterPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceUAN, urea ammonium nitrate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 502 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buhler, D. D., Doll, J. D., Proost, R. T., and Visocky, M. R. 1995. Integrating mechanical weeding with reduced herbicide use in conservation tillage corn production systems. Agron. J. 87: 507–512.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G. 1974. Susceptibility of seven annual grasses to herbicides. Weed Res. 14: 51–55.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. A., Hoverstad, T. R., and Greenwald, R. E. 1998. Integrated weed management using narrow corn row spacing, herbicides, and cultivation. Agron. J. 90: 40–46.Google Scholar
Lycan, D. W. and Hart, S. E. 1999. Utilization of herbicide resistant corn for woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) management. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 39:56.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. 1999. Relationships Among Woolly Cupgrass Emergence, Fecundity, and Seedbank Dynamics, and Their Impact on Management in Field Corn. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 142 p.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Relating Eriochloa villosa emergence to interference in Zea mays . Weed Sci. 47: 571–577.Google Scholar
Mulder, T. A. and Doll, J. D. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 382–389.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997. Weed and seedbank management with integrated methods as influenced by tillage. Weed Sci. 45: 706–715.Google Scholar
Pecinovsky, K. T. 1994. Woolly Cupgrass [Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth] and Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi L. Herrm) Competition and Herbicide Tolerance. . Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 113 p.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1997. Sequential applications control woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 537–542.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L., Harvey, R. G., and Albright, J. W. 1996. Herbicide timing and combination strategies for woolly cupgrass control in corn. J. Prod. Agric. 9: 381–384.Google Scholar
Schuh, J. F. and Harvey, R. G. 1989. Woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in corn (Zea mays) with pendimethalin/triazine combinations and cultivation. Weed Sci. 37: 405–411.Google Scholar
Schuh, J. F. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Carbamothioate and chloroacetamide herbicides for woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5: 331–336.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J. H., and Dickey, D. A. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 246–251.Google Scholar
Young, B. G. and Hart, S. E. 1996. Woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in sethoxydim-resistant corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:70.Google Scholar