Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:11:39.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Response to Picloram and 2,4-D

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David C. Heering  and
Thomas F. Peeper
David C. Heering
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Postemergence spring applications of picloram and picloram plus 2,4-D frequently reduced mature height and peduncle length of hard red winter wheat in field experiments. Yield reductions were more severe from picloram applied alone to the first joint growth stage than late tillering stage wheat. In two of six experiments picloram plus 2,4-D reduced yield more than picloram alone. Yields of four wheat cultivars were reduced by picloram and picloram plus 2,4-D at one of two locations. At the second location only the yield of ‘Chisholm’ and ‘Rohm and Haas Seed 7837’ were reduced by those herbicides.

Keywords

Picloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Cultivar tolerance
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 317 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1990. Tordon 22K weed killer. p. 668–686 in Crop Protection Chemicals Reference, 6th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
2. Chicherina, L. A., Talalakina, T. N., and Raskin, M. S. 1986. Varietal sensitivity of wheat to picloram. Physiol. Biochem. Cultivated Plants. 18:475–478.Google Scholar
3. Fabricius, L. J., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Sci. 16:204–208.Google Scholar
4. Friesen, G. 1965. Wild buckwheat control with Tordon. Down to Earth 20(4):9–10.Google Scholar
5. Greer, H.A.L., Peeper, T., and Fain, D. 1984. Wild buckwheat control in wheat. OSU Ext. Facts No. 2773. Coop. Ext. Serv., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater. 4 p.Google Scholar
6. Hafliger, T. J., Wolf, M., and Scholz, H. 1988. Polygonaceae. p. 265–311 in Puntener, W., ed. Dicot Weeds 1, Documenta CIBAGEIGY. Reinhardt Druck, Basle, Switzerland.Google Scholar
7. Hume, L., Martinez, J., and Best, K. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 60. Polygonum convolvulus L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:959–971.Google Scholar
8. Kirkland, K. J., and Keys, C. H. 1979. The long-term effect of picloram and its residue on grain production and weed control. Weed Sci. 27: 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McCormick, R. A., and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Control of wild buckwheat in Oklahoma winter wheat with Tordon 22K herbicide. Down to Earth 43(1):19–23.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D. 1970. Reaction of wheat to picloram. Weed Sci. 18: 276–278.Google Scholar
11. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.Google Scholar