Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:58:40.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Who are you and where are you Going?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robert L. Zimdahl
Robert L. Zimdahl*
Affiliation:
Weed Res. Lab., Dep. Plant Pathol. and Weed Sci., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first weed scientists were under great pressure to solve weed problems and when the magic of chemical technology appeared they seized it to replace human and animal energy for weeding. Today, weed scientists are striving for a reasonable accommodation between a productive and protected environment. Many weed scientists now believe that management, not control, should dominate weed science. Full integration of weed science into future agricultural systems requires that its practitioners make the quality and quantity of food produced equivalent goals.

Keywords

Herbicidesintegrated weed management systemsweed ecology
Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 388 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bok, D. 1992. Reclaiming the public trust. Change. July/August. p. 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Carson, R. 1962, Silent Spring. Houghton-Mifflin & Co., Boston. 368 p.Google Scholar
3. Glauninger, J. and Holzner, W. 1982. Interference between weeds and crops: A review of literature. p. 149–159 in Holzner, W. and Numata, M., eds. Biology and Ecology of Weeds. Dr. W. Junk, Publishers, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
4. Jackson, W. 1984. Toward a unifying concept for an ecological agriculture. p. 209–221 in Lowrance, R. and House, G. J., eds. Agricultural Ecosystems. J. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
5. Mayer, A. and Mayer, J. 1974. Agriculture, the island empire. Daedalus 103:83–95.Google Scholar
6. Soule, J., Carré, D., and Jackson, W. 1990. Ecological impact of modern agriculture. p. 165–188 in Carroll, C. R., Vandermeer, J. H. and Rossett, P. M., eds. Agroecology. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Thill, D. C., Lish, J. M., Callihan, R. H., and Bechinski, E. J. 1991. Integrated weed management—A component of integrated pest management: A critical review. Weed Technol. 5:648–656.Google Scholar
8. Weiner, J. 1990. Plant population ecology in agriculture. p. 235–262 in Carroll, C. R., Vandermeer, J. H., and Rossett, P. M., eds. Agroecology. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
9. Whitehead, A. N. 1967. Adventures of Ideas. The Free Press. New York, NY. p. 252–253.Google Scholar
10. Woodwell, G. M. 1979. Address of the past president. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. August. p. 190–195.Google Scholar
11. Zimdahl, R. L. 1991. Weed Science—A Plea for Thought. Coop. State Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C. 34 p.Google Scholar