Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T20:50:21.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Tolerance and Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control by AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 Mixed with Other Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

H. Lane Crooks
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Soft red winter wheat tolerance and Italian ryegrass control with AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 at 12.5 plus 2.5 g ai/ha applied alone and mixed with dicamba, 2,4-D, or thifensulfuron plus tribenuron were examined in separate field experiments. AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 applied alone in December injured wheat 12% or less, whereas mixtures with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron injured wheat 15% or less. AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 applied alone in February or mixed with dicamba, 2,4-D, or thifensulfuron plus tribenuron injured wheat 3% or less. No treatment affected yield of weed-free wheat. AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 applied in December controlled Italian ryegrass 86 to 99% in May and increased wheat yield 142 to 254%. At two of four locations, Italian ryegrass control was greater with the December application of AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 as compared with the February application. Dicamba or 2,4-D mixed with AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 reduced Italian ryegrass control in May approximately 10% in half the trials but did not affect wheat yield compared with AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 applied alone. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron mixed with AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 did not affect Italian ryegrass control or wheat yield. Under greenhouse conditions, the rate of AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 00 needed for 80% Italian ryegrass visible control and 80% shoot fresh weight reduction was increased 60 to 68% in mixtures with 2,4-D. Dicamba increased the rate needed for 80% visible control and shoot fresh weight reduction 132 to 139%.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003. Finesse herbicide supplemental labeling. Rotational interval to STS soybean, grain sorghum, cotton, non-STS soybeans, field corn, and rice. Web page: http://www.greenbook.net.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P., Olsen, P. D., and Colbert, D. R. 1976. Winter wheat yield reduction from interference by Italian ryegrass. Agron. J. 68:463466.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. AE F130060 00/iodosulfuron (AE F130060 00) for Italian ryegrass control in VA wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:21.Google Scholar
Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinner, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J. 69:911913.Google Scholar
Clemmer, K. C. 2002. Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Control in Imidazolinone-Tolerant Wheat (Triticum aestivum). . North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 71 p.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. 2003. Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) Management in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with AE F130060 plus AE F115008. Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 162 p.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. and York, A. C. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in wheat with AE F130060-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:2223.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2002. Weed management in wheat. in 2001–2002 Wheat Production Guide. Publication No. CSS0-01-17. Tifton, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 1530.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey—southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc 50:239242.Google Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. Pp. 2946.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. 1989. Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol. 3:217226.Google Scholar
Hand, S. S., Smith, T. L., Sanderson, J., Barr, G., Strachan, W. F., and Paulsgrove, M. 2002. AE F130060 00—a new selective herbicide for grass control in wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:142.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. M., Mueller, T. C., and Brawley, P. B. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in wheat with AE F130060-methyl plus iodosulfuron-methyl (AE F130060) with safener mefenpyr-diethyl (AE F107892). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:211.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2002. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Web page: http://www.weedsci.org.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. P. and Peeper, T. F. 2002. Performance of new herbicides for winter annual grass control in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 55:22.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987a. Effect of chlorsulfuron on diclofop phytotoxicity to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 35:383387.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A. and Worsham, A. D. 1987b. Interference of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 35:819823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.Google Scholar
Rawlings, J. O., Pantula, S. G., and Dickey, D. A. 1998. Models nonlinear in the parameters. in Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 490491.Google Scholar
Ritter, R. L. and Menbere, H. 2002. Preemergence control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 16:5559.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350352.Google Scholar
Van Duyn, J. W., Herbert, D. A., Bambara, S., and Weisz, R. 2000. Insect pest management for small grains. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000–2001. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 3743.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:247274.Google Scholar
Weisz, R., Bailey, J. E., and Tarleton, B. 2000. Small grain disease management: cultural practices, varieties, seed treatments, and foliar fungicides. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000–2001. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 4856.Google Scholar
Weisz, R. and Heiniger, R. 2000a. Small grain planting dates for North Carolina. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000–2001. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 2021.Google Scholar
Weisz, R. and Heiniger, R. 2000b. Nitrogen management for small grains. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000–2001. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 2225.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Weisz, R., Crooks, H. L., and Tarleton, B. 2000. Small grain weed control. in Small Grain Production Guide 2000–2001. Publication No. AG-580. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 5763.Google Scholar