Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:42:20.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Science in the 1990s: Will It be Forward or in Reverse?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Homer M. Lebaron
Homer M. Lebaron*
Affiliation:
New Technology and Basic Research Dep., Agric. Div., CIBA GEIGY Corp., Greensboro, NC 27419
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dr. Homer M. LeBaron is Senior Research Fellow in the New Technology and Basic Research Department of CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, where He has the responsibility for coordinating and directing outside basic research on all of CIBA-GEIGY agricultural products. He has been employed in various R&D positions with Geigy and CIBA-GEIGY for 27 years. From 1960 to 1964, Dr. LeBaron was employed as a plant physiologist at the Virginia Tech Experiment Station in Norfolk, Virginia, mainly researching weed problems in vegetables and fruit crops.

LeBaron was born May 13, 1926 in Southern Alberta, Canada, the third in a family of 10 children, and grew up on a diversified irrigation farm. He obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees from Utah State University in 1955 and 1957. He received his Ph.D. degree from Cornell in 1960.

LeBaron, in addition to WSSA, is a member of the American Society of Agronomy, American Chemical Society, Entomological Society of America, American Phytopathological Society, CAST, Sigma Xi, Aquatic Plant Management Society, European Weed Research Society, and all of the regional weed science societies.

He has held numerous positions in several of these and other scientific societies. Homer served as president of NEWSS in 1969–70 and as president of the SWSS in 1986–87. He served on several WSSA committees, including the Executive Board of Directors. In 1978, Dr. LeBaron was elected a Fellow in the WSSA, and received the Distinguished Service Award in the SWSS in 1984.

He is author of over 70 scientific publications, and has been editor and author of five books on herbicide and pesticide resistance and biotechnology. He is currently serving on the parent Herbicide Resistance Action Committee (HRAC) under GIFAP, as well as on the ALS/AHAS Inhibitors Resistance Working Group and as Chairman of the Triazine Resistance Working Group. He is on the Planning Committee and Co-Chair of the Weed Resistance Management Working Group within the International Organization for Pest Resistance Management (IOPRM). In addition to his busy professional schedule, Dr. LeBaron has always been involved in church and community affairs. He has 7 children and 20 grandchildren.

Type
WSSA Communications
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 671 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ames, B. N. 1989. Environmental pollution and cancer causation: six common errors. p. 1–24 in DeVita, V. T. Jr., Hellman, S., and Rosenberg, S. A., eds., Important Advances in Oncology, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1989. Analysis of Natural Resources Defense Council Report, Intolerable Risk: Pesticides in Our Children's Food, California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1990. Wisconsin biotechnology boosters embarrassed by state ban on BST. Genetic Technology News, Technical Insights, Inc., Englewood, NJ.Google Scholar
4. Brown, L. R. 1988. Breakthrough on soil erosion. World Watch 1(3):19–42. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5. Brown, L. R. 1988. The changing world food prospect: the nineties and beyond. Worldwatch Paper 85. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Butz, E. L. 1989. Our greatest risk: The danger that we quit risking. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:1–4.Google Scholar
7. Combellack, J. H. 1989. The importance of weeds and the advantages and disadvantages of herbicide use. Plant Prot. Q. 4:14–32.Google Scholar
8. Daberkow, S. G., and Reichelderfer, K. H. 1988. Low-input agriculture: trends, goals, and prospects for input use. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 70:1159–1166.Google Scholar
9. Durning, A. B. 1989. Poverty and the environment: reversing the downward spiral. Worldwatch Paper 92. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
10. Durning, A. B. 1990. Life on the brink. World Watch 3(2):22–30.Google Scholar
11. Ehrlich, P. R. 1989. Facing the habitability crisis. Bioscience 39(7): 480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Fawcett, R. S. 1989. Does the ice age cause cancer in Iowa? Agrichemical Age, Nov 16–28.Google Scholar
13. Ferguson, J. 1990. In summing Up. Ag Consultant, March p. 29.Google Scholar
14. Flynn, L. T. 1988. Pesticides: Helpful or Harmful? The American Council on Science and Health, New York, NY.Google Scholar
15. Hullar, T. L., Chairman of Committee. 1989. Investing in Research: A Proposal to Strengthen the Agricultural, Food, and Environmental System. National Research Council, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
16. LeBaron, H. M. 1987. The Southern Weed Science Society and weed science in the 1980s and beyond. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:16–26.Google Scholar
17. Marten, J. 1989. Will low-input rotations sustain your income? Farm J. Dec. 1989, p. 6.Google Scholar
18. Matossian, M. K. 1989. Poisons of the Past: Molds, Epidemics and History. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
19. McKinney, L. 1990. Fields of Fear. Choices, Am. Agric. Econ. Assn., Publ., Herndon, VA, 1st Quarter, p. 16.Google Scholar
20. McWhorter, C. G., and Barrentine, W. L. 1988. Research priorities in weed science. Weed Technol. 2:2–11.Google Scholar
21. Mellor, J. W., and Riely, F. Z. 1989. Expanding the green revolution. Issues in Science and Technology. Fall, p. 66–74.Google Scholar
22. Osteen, C. D., and Szmedra, P. I. 1989. Agricultural Pesticide Use Trends and Policy Issues. USDA, ERS, Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 622.Google Scholar
23. Pesek, J., Chairman of Committee. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. National Research Council, Nat. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
24. Reichelderfer, K. H. 1985. Factors affecting the economic feasibility of the biological control of weeds, p. 135–144, in Delfosse, E. S., ed. Proc. VI Int. Symp. Biol. Contrib. Weeds. Aug. 19–25, 1984, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
25. Service, M W. 1990. Control of urban mosquitoes. Pestic. Outlook 1(2): 17–20.Google Scholar
26. Simmonds, B. and Brosten, D. 1990. Defining organic. Agrichemical Age. March, p. 12.Google Scholar
27. Steinbeck, J. 1939. The Grapes of Wrath. Viking Press, New York.Google Scholar
28. Tweeten, L. 1989. The Competitive Environment for Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer, in Office of Technology Assessment Workshop report on Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer Policy for the 1990's, Washington, DC. Sept. 26–27, 1989.Google Scholar
29. Urbanchuk, J. 1990. Value of Crop Protection Chemicals and Fertilizers to American Agriculture and the Consumer. GRC Economics. NACA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
30. Vogt, W. 1948. Road to Survival. William Sloane Associates, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
31. Wittwer, S. H. 1982. U.S. agriculture in the context of the world food situation, p. 193. in Science Technology, and the Issues of the Eighties: Policy Outlook. Teich, A. H. and Thornton, R., ed. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
32. Yeutter, C. 1990. An interview with Clayton Yeutter, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture. Choices, Am. Agric. Econ. Assoc., 1st Quarter, p. 3–7.Google Scholar
33. Youth, H. 1989. Boom time for environmental groups. World Watch 2(6), p. 33. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar