Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:18:31.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management in Transplanted Bell Pepper (Capsicum frutescens) with Clomazone and Rimsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John A. Ackley ,
Henry P. Wilson  and
Thomas E. Hines
John A. Ackley
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Henry P. Wilson
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Thomas E. Hines
Affiliation:
Eastern Shore Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Painter, VA 23420-2827
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field studies, in 1993, 1994, and 1995, clomazone at 390 g ai/ha and rimsulfuron at 35 g ai/ha were evaluated preplant incorporated (PPI) and postemergence (POST), respectively, for weed control and crop response in transplanted ‘Keystone RG3’ bell pepper. Clomazone did not injure bell pepper. Common lambsquarters and jimsonweed control was 77 to 95% by clomazone treatments but was variable by rimsulfuron treatments at 41 to 93% common lambsquarters control and 42 to 68% jimsonweed control; common ragweed control by both herbicides was unacceptable. Injury by rimsulfuron to bell pepper in the field was 19 to 47% at 21 DAT. In the greenhouse, injury to Keystone RG3 and three additional bell pepper varieties, ‘Camelot,’ ‘Jupiter,’ and ‘Memphis’ was similar at 44 to 62% by rimsulfuron at 17 to 35 g/ha POST, and bell pepper had lower height and dry weight than untreated controls. In the greenhouse, jimsonweed control was below 49% and black nightshade control was below 23% by 17 to 35 g/ha rimsulfuron. In these studies, clomazone controlled common lambsquarters and jimsonweed without injury to bell pepper. The solanaceous weeds treated in this study were not well controlled by rimsulfuron, and bell pepper was not sufficiently tolerant to rimsulfuron to permit its use in this crop.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidionerimsulfuron, N-[[(4,6- dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2- pyridinesulfonamideblack nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. # SOLNIcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemsiifolia L. # AMBELjimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. # DATSTbell pepper, Capsicum frutescens L., ‘Camelot,’ ‘Jupiter,’ ‘Keystone RG3,’ ‘Memphis.'Postemergencepreplant incorporatedclomazonerimsulfuronAmbrosia artemsiifoliaChenopodium albumDatura stramoniumSolanum nigrumAMBELCHEALDATST SOLNIDAP, days after transplantingDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 458 - 462
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Mines, T. E. 1992. Herbicide programs for transplanted peppers. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:74.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996a. Weed Management programs in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 10:354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1996b. Efficacy of rimsulfuron and metribuzin in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 10:475–480.Google Scholar
Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., Manley, B. S., and Hines, T. E. 1995. Rimsulfuron applications in transplanted bell peppers. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 35:61.Google Scholar
Baltajar, A. M., Monoco, T. J., and Peele, D. M. 1984. Bentazon selectivity in hot pepper (Capsicum chinense) and sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Sci. 32:243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewick, T. A., Smith, K. E., Stall, W. M., and Olsen, S. M. 1995. Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) cultivar and weed sensitivity to DPX-E9636. Weed Technol. 9:499–503.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Lynch, D. R., and Entz, T. 1995. Postemergence broadleaf weed control in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron and HOE-0750.12. Weed Technol. 9:228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Whitmore, J. C., Stanger, C. E., and Guttieri, M. J. 1994. Postemergence weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 8:428–435.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–422.Google Scholar
Eshel, Y., Katan, J., and Palevitch, D. 1973. Selection action of diphenamid and napropamide in pepper (Capsicum annuum) and weeds. Weed Res. 13:379–384.Google Scholar
Frank, J. R., Schwartz, P. H., and Bourke, J. B. 1988. Insect and weed interactions on bell peppers (Capsicum annuum). Weed Technol. 2:423–428.Google Scholar
Frank, J. R., Schwartz, P. H., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Modeling the effects of weed interference periods and insects on bell peppers (Capsicum annuum). Weed Sci. 40:308–312.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., McClelland, M. R., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Clomazone as a component in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 7:202–211.Google Scholar
Lanini, W. T. and Le Strange, M. 1991. Bell pepper production with herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 31:45.Google Scholar
Lanini, W. T. and Le Strange, M. 1994. Weed control economics in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) with napropamide and hand weeding. Weed Technol. 8:530–535.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1992. Pepper (Capsicum annuum) cultivar response to metolachlor in three New Mexico soils. Weed Technol. 6:366–373.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678–685.Google Scholar