Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:26:53.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management in Narrow- and Wide-Row Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bryan G. Young ,
Julie M. Young ,
Lisa C. Gonzini ,
Stephen E. Hart ,
Loyd M. Wax  and
George Kapusta
Bryan G. Young*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Julie M. Young
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
Lisa C. Gonzini
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Stephen E. Hart
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted over 3 yr at three locations in Illinois to evaluate the efficacy of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean planted in rows spaced 19, 38, and 76 cm. Minimal soybean injury (less than 10%) was observed from any glyphosate treatment. Glyphosate treatments controlled 82 to 99% of giant foxtail. Common waterhemp control was increased as soybean row spacing was decreased. Applying sequential glyphosate applications or increasing the glyphosate rate from 420 g ae/ha to 840 g/ha frequently increased common waterhemp control in 76-cm rows. Velvetleaf control with glyphosate was variable, ranging from 48 to 99%. Decreasing soybean row spacing, utilizing sequential glyphosate applications, or increasing the glyphosate rate improved velvetleaf control in at least four of eight site-years. Glyphosate treatments generally resulted in weed control and soybean yield equal to or greater than the standard herbicide treatments. However, glyphosate treatments yielded less than the hand-weeded control in four of eight site-years, suggesting that weed control from glyphosate treatments was sometimes inadequate.

Keywords

Glyphosatecommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer #3 AMATAgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. # ABUTHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrHerbicide-resistant cropsEPOST, early postemergenceLPOST, late postemergenceMPOST, mid-postemergenceNIS, nonionic surfactantUAN, 28% urea ammonium nitrateWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 112 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 13: 394–398.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and Amiben. Weeds 12: 109–112.Google Scholar
Claassen, M. M., Gordon, W. B., Maddux, L. D., Peterson, D. E., and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Weed control in solid-seeded versus row planted glyphosate resistant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 127–128.Google Scholar
Dobbels, A. F. and Loux, M. M. 1997. Weed competition in glyphosate tolerant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:127.Google Scholar
Franzenburg, D. D., Owen, M.D.K., Lux, J. F., and Adam, K. W. 1998. Herbicide application strategies for weed control in glyphosate tolerant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:27.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 354–360.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. M. and Brawley, P. A. 1996. Johnsongrass management in no-till Roundup Ready soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 56–57.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10: 957–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legere, A. and Schreiber, M. M. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as affected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 37: 84–92.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Renner, K. A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 10: 431–437.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14: 413–422.Google Scholar
Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations, and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13: 285–289.Google Scholar
Pinnon, P. E. and Kapusta, G. 1996. Weed control in wide and narrow row no-till soybean with glyphosate. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 124–125.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., Holman, C. S., and Niekamp, J. W. 1996. Total POST weed management in wide row no-till glyphosate tolerant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:120.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 478–483.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16: 462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar