Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T15:19:36.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management in Mechanized-Sown, Zero-Till Dry-Seeded Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bhagirath S. Chauhan  and
Seth B. Abugho
Bhagirath S. Chauhan*
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños 4031, Philippines
Seth B. Abugho
Affiliation:
Crop and Environmental Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños 4031, Philippines
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weeds are the main constraint in the adoption of zero-till, dry-seeded rice systems because weeds and rice emerge simultaneously in these systems, and there is no standing water at crop establishment to suppress weeds. A study was conducted during the wet season of 2011 and the dry season of 2012 at the International Rice Research Institute to evaluate the performance of different herbicides in mechanized-sown, zero-till dry-seeded rice. Among the treatments evaluated, oxadiazon followed by penoxsulam + cyhalofop followed by one hand-weeding at 42 d after sowing, provided 23 to 35% higher yield than the nontreated control. The yields in the oxadiazon-treated plots were similar to those in the weed-free plots. Some weed species, including eclipta and doveweed, were not controlled by the evaluated herbicides. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate additional herbicides and to integrate them with cultural weed management strategies to manage such problematic weeds.

Las malezas son la principal limitante para la adopción de la labranza cero en sistemas de arroz sembrado en secano porque en estos sistemas las malezas y el arroz emergen simultáneamente y no hay una lámina de agua presente que suprima las malezas al momento del establecimiento del cultivo. Se realizó un estudio durante la época lluviosa de 2011 y la época seca de 2012 en el Instituto Internacional de Investigaciones sobre el Arroz para evaluar el desempeño de diferentes herbicidas en siembra mecanizada, labranza cero y siembra de arroz de secano. Entre los tratamientos evaluados, oxadiazon seguido de penoxsulam + cyhalofop seguido por una deshierba manual a 42 d después de la siembra, resultó en un rendimiento 23 a 35% mayor que el testigo no-tratado. Los rendimientos en las parcelas tratadas con oxadiazon fueron similares a los de las parcelas libres de malezas. Algunas especies de malezas, incluyendo Eclipta prostrata y Murdannia nudiflora, no fueron controladas por los herbicidas evaluados. Por esta razón, existe la necesidad de evaluar herbicidas adicionales y su integración con estrategias de manejo cultural para el manejo de estas malezas problemáticas.

Keywords

CyhalofopoxadiazonpenoxsulamdoveweedMurdannia nudiflora (L.) Brenan MUDNUecliptaEclipta prostrata (L.) L. ECLALriceOryza sativa L. ORYSABiomassdry-seeded riceefficacyweed densityzero-till
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 28 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ampong-Nyarko, K. and De Datta, S. K. 1991. A Handbook for Weed Control in Rice. Los Baños, Philippines : International Rice Research Institute. 113 p.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. 2011. Crowfootgrass (Dactyloctenium aegyptium) germination and response to herbicides in the Philippines. Weed Sci. 59 :512–516.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. 2012. Weed ecology and weed management strategies for dry-seeded rice in Asia. Weed Technol. 26 :1–13.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Abugho, S. B. 2012. Effect of growth stage on the efficacy of postemergence herbicides on four weed species of direct-seeded rice. Sci. World J. DOI: , 7 p.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2009. Influence of tillage systems on weed seedling emergence pattern in rainfed rice. Soil Tillage Res. 106 :15–21.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2010. The role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropics. Adv. Agron. 105 :221–262.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S. and Johnson, D. E. 2011. Growth response of direct-seeded rice to oxadiazon and bispyribac-sodium in aerobic and saturated soils. Weed Sci. 59 :119–122.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S., Gill, G., and Preston, C. 2006a. Tillage system effects on weed ecology, herbicide activity and persistence: a review. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 46 :1557–1570.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S., Gill, G., and Preston, C. 2006b. Influence of tillage systems on vertical distribution, seedling recruitment and persistence of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed bank. Weed Sci. 54 :669–676.Google Scholar
Chauhan, B. S., Singh, R. G., and Mahajan, G. 2012. Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: a review. Crop Prot. 38 :57–65.Google Scholar
GenStat 8.0. 2005. GenStat Release 8 Reference Manual. Oxford, UK : VSN International.Google Scholar
Gopal, R., Jat, R. K., Malik, R. K., Kumar, V., Alam, M. M., Jat, M. L., Mazid, M. A., Saharawat, Y. S., McDonald, A., and Gupta, R. 2010. Direct Dry Seeded Rice Production Technology and Weed Management in Rice Based Systems. New Delhi, India: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center Technical Bulletin. Pages 28 p.Google Scholar
Ishaya, D. B., Dadari, S. A., and Shebayan, J.A.Y. 2007. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in three varieties of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in the Nigerian Savannah. Crop Prot. 26 :1490–1495.Google Scholar
Mahajan, G., Chauhan, B. S., Timsina, J., Singh, P. P., and Singh, K. 2012. Crop performance and water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies in dry-seeded rice in response to irrigation and fertilizer amounts in northwest India. Field Crops Res. 134 :59–70.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. and Velasco, L. 2005. Trends in crop establishment methods in Asia and research issues. Pages 178–181 in Toriyama, K., Heong, K. L., and Hardy, B., eds. Rice Is Life: Scientific Perspectives for the 21st Century—Proceedings of the World Rice Research Conference. Los Baños, Philippines : International Rice Research Institute, and Tsukuba, Japan : Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Ladha, J. K., Gupta, R. K., Bhusan, L., Rao, A. N., Sivaprasad, B., and Singh, P. P. 2007. Evaluation of mulching, intercropping with Sesbania and herbicide use for weed management in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Crop Prot. 26 :518–524.Google Scholar
Tuong, T. P. and Bouman, B. A. M. 2003. Rice production in water-scarce environments, Pages 53–67 in Kijne, J. W., Barker, R., and Molden, D., eds. Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvements. Wallingford, UK : CABI.Google Scholar