Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:46:34.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Management in Common Cottonwood (Populus deltoides) Nursery Plantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2018

H. Kaur ,
Navneet Kaur ,
R. I. S. Gill ,
Makhan S. Bhullar  and
A. Singh
H. Kaur
Affiliation:
Postgraduate student, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Navneet Kaur*
Affiliation:
Assistant Agronomist, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
R. I. S. Gill
Affiliation:
Senior Scientist (Agroforestry), Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Makhan S. Bhullar
Affiliation:
Senior Agronomist, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
A. Singh
Affiliation:
Senior Scientist (Forestry), Regional Research Station, Bathinda, India
*
Author for correspondence: Navneet Kaur, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana-141004, India. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common cottonwood-based agroforestry system is widely adopted in Indian Indo-Gangetic plains. The stem cuttings of common cottonwood are raised in a nursery 10 to 12 months in rows spaced 0.5 mx0.5 m, before re-planting in the field. The longer duration of 10 to 12 months and wider spacing of stem cuttings in the nursery makes the entire transplants highly vulnerable to weed competition, especially during early establishment stages. The efficacy of preemergence herbicides and plastic and straw mulches for weed management in common cottonwood nursery was investigated at two sites in years 2014 and 2015. The major weed flora in the experimental field consisted of three grass weeds (crowfootgrass, feather lovegrass, and southern crabgrass), and four broadleaf weeds (scarlet pimpernel, garden spurge, niruri, and lesser swinecress). The integrated use of pendimethalin or alachlor applied PRE with paddy straw mulch significantly reduced density and biomass of both grass and broadleaf weeds compared to herbicide or straw mulch used alone, and provided similar level of weed control to hand weeding at both locations. Spreading of plastic mulch in the whole field after punching holes for common cottonwood stem cuttings, or in row spaces recorded similar weed control to hand-weeding. The integrated use of herbicides with straw mulch, and or plastic mulch alone significantly improved plant height, stem diameter, below- and above-ground biomass of common cottonwood plants compared to unweeded check. The study concluded that integrated use of herbicides plus paddy straw mulch or plastic mulch alone could be adopted for weed management in common cottonwood nursery plantations.

Keywords

Prashant Jha, Montana State UniversityAlachlorpendimethalincrowfootgrass, Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd.feather lovegrass, Eragrostis tenella (L.) Beauv. ex Roemer & J.A. Schultesgarden spurge, Chamaesyce hirta (L.) Millsp.lesser swinecress, Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm.niruri, Phyllanthus niruri L.scarlet pimpernel, Anagallis arvensis L.southern crabgrass, Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel.common cottonwood, Populus deltoides Marshall.Agroforestryherbicidesintegratedmulchnursery
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 284 - 289
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altland, JE, Gilliam, CH, Wehtje, G (2003) Weed control in field nurseries. Hort Technol 13:9–14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, GS, Minhas, PPS, Brar, SS, Bal, JS (1991) Effect of various herbicides on weed control in pear orchards. Indian J Weed Sci 22:10–14 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Netzer, DA, Riemenschneider, DE, Hartzler, RG (1998) Weed management in short rotation poplar and weed-poplar competition dynamics herbaceous perennial crops grown for biofuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 14:385–394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalker-Scott, L (2007) Impact of mulches on landscape plants and the environment - A review. J Environ Hort 25:239–249 Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Strahan, RE, Bracy, RP (2013) Effects of mulching and pre emergence herbicide placement on yellow nutsedge control and ornamental plant quality in landscape beds. Hort Technol 23:651–658 Google Scholar
Dhiman, RC, Gandhi, JN (2011) Testing of mechanical and chemical methods for weed control in poplar (Populus deltoides Bartr.) nurseries. J Tree Sci 30:60–67 Google Scholar
Dixon, FL, Clay, DV (2004) Effect of herbicides applied pre- and post-emergence on forestry weeds grown from seed. Crop Prot 23:713–721 Google Scholar
Fortier, J, Messier, C (2006) Are chemical treatments more sustainable for forest vegetation in the context of the TRIAD? For Chron 82:806–818 Google Scholar
George, BH, Brennan, PD (2002) Herbicides are more cost-effective than alternative weed control methods for increasing early growth of Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus saligna . N For 24:147–163 Google Scholar
Green, DS, Kruger, EL, Stanosz, GR (2003) Effects of polyethylene mulch in a short-rotation, poplar plantation vary with weed-control strategies, site quality and clone. For Ecol Manag 173:251–260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, EA, Netzer, DA (1985) Weed Control Using Herbicides in Short-Rotation Intensively Cultured Poplar Plantations. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pp 1–6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janaki, P, Chinnusamy, C, Sakthivel, N, Nithya, N (2015) Field dissipation of pendimethalin and alachlor in sandy clay loam soil and its terminal residues in sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). J Appl Nat Sci 7:709–713 Google Scholar
Marino, PC, Gross, KL (1998) Competitive effects of conspecific and herbaceous (weeds) plants on growth and branch architecture of Populus X euramericana cv Eugenei. Can J Forest Res 28:359–367 Google Scholar
McCarthy, N, Bentsen, NS, Willoughby, I, Balandier, P (2011) The state of forest vegetation management in Europe in the 21st century. Eur J For Res 130:7–16 Google Scholar
Miller, RO, Bloese, P (2002) Imazaquin and pendimethalin use for weed control in hybrid poplar plantations in Michigan: Second-year results. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Forest Biomass Innovation Center Research Report. https://www.canr.msu.edu/uploads/396/36452/Imazaquin_and_pendimethalin_use_for_weed.pdf Google Scholar
Mohanty, S, Sonkar, RK, Marathe, RA (2002) Effect of mulching on Nagpur mandarin cultivation in drought prone region of central India. Indian J Soil Conserv 30:286–289 Google Scholar
Parfitt, RI, Clay, DV, Arnold, GM, Foulkes, A (1992) Weed control in new plantations of short rotation willow and poplar coppice. Aspects Appl Biol 29:419–424 Google Scholar
Patakioutas, G, Albanis, TA (2002) Adsorption –desorption studies of alachlor, metolachlor, EPTC, chlorothalonil and pirimiphos -methyl in contrasting soils. Pest Manag Sci 58:352–336 Google Scholar
Ramakrishna, A, Tamb, HM, Wani, SP, Dinh, T (2006) Long effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in Northern Vietnam. Field Crops Res 95:115–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL (2012) Field dissipation of sulfentrazone and pendimethalin in Colorado. Weed Technol 26:633–637 Google Scholar
Singh, A, Kumar, A (2014) Critical issues in poplar-based agroforestry system. Indian J Agrofor 16:58–67 Google Scholar
Singh, RD, Sud, RK, Pal, PK (2014) Integrated weed management in plantation crops. Pages 255–280 in Chauhan VS, Mahajan G eds, Recent Advances in Weed Management. New York, NY: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sixto, H, Grau, JM, García-Baudín, JM (2001) Assessment of the effect of broad-spectrum pre-emergence herbicides in poplar nurseries. Crop Prot 20:121–126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasic, V, Konstantinovic, B, Orlovic, S (2007) Weed flora in poplar nurseries. In Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society 14th EWRS symposium. Hamar, Norway: European Weed Research SocietyGoogle Scholar
Vasic, V, Orlovic, S, Galic, Z (2009) Forest vegetation and management–Serbia. Pages 117–122 in Willoughby I, Balandier P, Bentsen NS, McCarthy N, Claridge J eds, Forest Vegetation Management in Europe: Current Practice and Future Requirements. Brussels: COST Office Google Scholar
Vasic, V, Orlovic, S, Pap, P, Kovacevic, B, Drekic, M, Poljakovi, Galic Z (2015) Application of pre-emergence herbicides in poplar nursery production. J Forestry Res 26:143–151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, RG, Newton, M, Cole, EC, Miller, JH, Shiver, BD (2004) The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Wild Soc Bull 4:1028–1041 Google Scholar