Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:41:17.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control Programs in Drilled Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Scott A. Payne  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Scott A. Payne*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author: S. A. Payne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 19-cm-row soybean during 1997 and 1998 to evaluate the rate and timing of glyphosate applications applied alone at 0.42 and 0.63 kg ae/ha and with other herbicides to glyphosate-resistant soybean in terms of weed control, soybean yield, and net return. Weed species included barnyardgrass, hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and prickly sida. Among glyphosate-alone weed control programs, sequential applications generally provided the highest and most consistent control of all species evaluated (above 90% for broadleaf species). Glyphosate applied in combination with selective postemergence (POST) herbicides or following soil-applied herbicides controlled most species comparable to sequential glyphosate applications. Most herbicide programs, except for single glyphosate applications, were comparable to sequential glyphosate applications in terms of soybean yield and net return and ranged from 2,221 to 2,827 kg/ha and $410.28 to $549.60/ha. Depending on the year, either one or two glyphosate applications were needed for adequate weed control in programs with a soil-applied herbicide. Glyphosate rate affected neither weed control, yield, nor net return. Depending on a producer's management style and weed spectrum, weed control programs with glyphosate alone, in combination with another POST herbicide, or following soil-applied herbicides are all viable options in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean.

Keywords

Glyphosatebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory. # SEBEXpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Delta King 5961 RR’Glyphosate economicsEchinochloa crus-galliIpomoea lacunosaSesbania exaltataSida spinosaGlycine maxECHCGIPOLASEBEXSIDSPNIS, nonionic surfactantPOST, postemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 413 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahmadi, M. S., Haderlie, L. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Effect of growth stage and water stress on barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control and on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 28: 277–282.Google Scholar
Aldridge, G., Moshier, L. J., and Freed, B. E. 1996. Performance of glyphosate tolerant soybean as influenced by weed control systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 51:129.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, M. 1978. Antagonistic effect of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, J. C., Shaw, D. R., and Schraer, S. M. 1997. Influence of application timing on efficacy of glyphosate in Roundup Ready® soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 176–177.Google Scholar
Bullock, D., Khan, S., and Rayburn, A. 1998. Soybean yield response to narrow rows is largely due to enhanced early growth. Crop Sci. 38: 1011–1016.Google Scholar
Cahoon, J., Ferguson, J., Edwards, D., and Tacker, P. 1990. A microcomputerbased irrigation scheduler for the humid mid-south region. Appl. Eng. Agric. 6: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derting, C. W., Dixon, G. A., Rahn, P. R., and Raymond, J. P. 1995. Herbicide and row spacing influences on weed control and yields of Roundup Ready soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:203.Google Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frederick, J. R., Bauer, P. J., Busscher, W. J., and McCutcheon, G. S. 1998. Tillage management for doublecropped soybean grown in narrow and wide row width culture. Crop Sci. 38: 755–762.Google Scholar
Goldmon, D. L. 1997. Performance of Roundup Ready® soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:33.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., Kapusta, G., and Wax, L. M. 1995. Effect of row spacing on weed control in glyphosate tolerant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 50: 130–131.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1996. Herbicide combinations for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 51: 125–126.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1990. Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance. Weed Technol. 4: 186–198.Google Scholar
Howe, O. W. III and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35: 185–193.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, L. S., Connell, J. C., McCutchen, T., and Overton, J. R. 1976. Response of prickly sida and soybeans to various herbicides. Weed Sci. 24: 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
McKinley, T. L., Roberts, R. K., Hayes, R. M., and English, B. C. 1999. Economic comparison of herbicides for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 30–36.Google Scholar
McNamara, W. and Martin, A. R. 1996. Weed management in glyphosate tolerant soybeans. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 51: 121–122.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. W., Martin, A. R., and Roeth, F. W. 1995. Weed management in glyphosate tolerant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 50: 128–129.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27: 58–64.Google Scholar
Miller, D. K., Milligan, J. L., and Wilson, C. F. 1998. Evaluation of reduced rate PRE herbicides in Roundup Ready soybean weed control programs. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 271–272.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 1996. Critical period of weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 51: 130–131.Google Scholar
Ohmes, G. A. Jr., Kendig, J. A., and DeFelice, M. S. 1995. Annual weed control in glyphosate tolerant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 50:129.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Taylor, S. E., and Gander, J. R. 1996. Influence of application timing and rate of glyphosate on weed control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:57.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. W., Shaw, D. R., and Scott, R. C. 1997. Weed control programs in Roundup Ready® soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:177.Google Scholar
Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacing, cultivation, and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 12: 285–289.Google Scholar
Scott, R., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1998. Glyphosate tank mixtures with SAN 582 for burndown or POST applications in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12: 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29: 185–190.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Shaw, D. R., and Brommer, C. L. 1997. Weed control with sequential Roundup applications in Roundup Ready® soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 39–40.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P. L., Parker, W. B., Miller, K. J., and Wells, B. H. 1994. Weed control with Roundup Ready® soybeans in wide and narrow rows. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:125.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46: 652–660.Google Scholar
Vail, G. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7: 220–225.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. and Griffin, J. L. 1997. POST weed control in soybeans utilizing glyphosate and chlorimuron. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:175.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., Holman, D. S., and Niekamp, J. W. 1996. Total post weed management in wide row no-till glyphosate tolerant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 51:120.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 478–483.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Bryant, K. J., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in nontransgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, A. C. 1995. Weed management with Roundup Ready™ soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 34–35.Google Scholar