Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:40:16.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Grape After Fall and Spring Application of Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sorkel Kadir  and
Kassim Al-Khatib
Sorkel Kadir*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Forestry, & Recreation Resources, 2021 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Manhattan, KS 66506-5506
Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004A Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil-residual herbicides can be applied to the soil under grapevines during fall or spring before weed emergence. But, early spring moisture and warm weather conditions may enhance weed emergence before spring herbicide applications. Therefore, fall application of herbicide can be useful if the herbicides provide adequate weed control the following spring and summer. Fall and spring applications of oryzalin or norflurazon, applied alone or in combination with diuron, simazine, or oxyfluorfen, were evaluated for weed control in grape at Oskaloosa and Eudora in northeast Kansas in the 2002 to 2003 and 2003 to 2004 growing seasons. Weeds were not controlled adequately with oryzalin or norflurazon applied alone. At the end of the growing season, weed control was 10 to 20% greater when herbicides were applied in the spring than when applied in the fall. In addition, weed control with norflurazon was slightly greater than with oryzalin. In general, norflurazon or oryzalin applied in combination with simazine, diuron, or oxyfluorfen gave greater weed control than norflurazon or oryzalin applied alone. The greatest control was with norflurazon or oryzalin applied with oxyfluorfen. In general, all herbicide combinations provided similar weed control 4 mo after spring treatment in 2003 and 3 mo after spring treatment in 2004. This study showed that acceptable weed control can be achieved when norflurazon or oryzalin is applied with oxyfluorfen or diuron in the fall.

Keywords

Diuronnorflurazonoryzalinoxyfluorfensimazinegrape, Vitis labrusca #3 VITLAGrape injurycommon ragweedhorseweedprickly sidaprickly lettucetumble windmillgrassyellow sweetcloverMASTmonth after spring treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 74 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K., Libbey, C., and Kadir, S. 1995. Broadleaf weed control and cabbage seed yield following herbicide application. Hortscience 30:1211–1214.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2005. Research and Extension. Manhattan, KS: Weather Data Library, Kansas State University. Web page: http://www.oznet.ksu.edu/wdl/. Accessed: February 15, 2005.Google Scholar
Bordelon, B. P. and Weller, S. C. 1997. Preplant cover crops affect weed and vine-growth in first-year vineyards. Hortscience 32:1040–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M. E. 1978. Initial response of Baco Noir grapevines to pruning severity, sucker removal, and weed control. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 29:192–198.Google Scholar
Code, G. R. 1990. Weed control in vines—some experiments results and views. Plant Prot. Q. 5:110–112.Google Scholar
Gingerich, L. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1976. Soil persistence of isopropalin and oryzalin. Weed Sci. 24:431–434.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Kadir, S. and Bauernfeind, R. 2005. Midwest Commercial Small Fruit and Grape Spray Guide. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service. Pp. 55–59.Google Scholar
Kadir, S., Bauernfeind, R., and Tisserat, N. 2004. Commercial grape production in Kansas. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Cooperative Research and Extension publication M2370. Pp. 26.Google Scholar
Kaps, M. L. and Odneal, M. B. 1991. Fall-applied preemergent herbicides in a Missouri vineyard do not control annual weeds the following season. Hortscience 26:1292–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. M., Talbert, R. E., and Morris, J. R. 1979. Weed control in ‘Concord’ grapes in Arkansas. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 104:713–716.Google Scholar
Krieger, M. S., Merritt, D. A., Wolt, J. D., and Paterson, W. L. 1998. Concurrent patterns of sorption-degradation of oryzalin and degradates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3292–3299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaco, T. J., Weller, S. C., and Ashton, F. M. 2002. Weed Science: Principle and Practices. New York, J. Wiley. Pp. 127–145.Google Scholar
Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Antagonistic effects of MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 29:566–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, R. M., Dunst, R. M., and Lasko, A. N. 1990. Comparison of sod, mulch, cultivation, and herbicide floor management practices for grape production in nonirrigated vineyards. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 115:872–877.Google Scholar
Prosch, S. D. and Weber, J. B. 1982. Interaction of dinitroaniline and acetoanilide herbicides in controlling ivyleaf morningglory. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:352–357.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. L. and Schafer, D. W. 1997. The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury. Pp. 91–97.Google Scholar
Sanok, W. J., Smith, J., and Dobson, J. 1985. Herbicide evaluation in young grape vines. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:214.Google Scholar
Shaulis, N. and Steele, R. G. D. 1969. The interaction of resistant rootstock to nitrogen, weed control, pruning, and thinning effects on productivity of ‘Concord’ grapevine. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 94:422–429.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Kennedy, J. M., and Moore, J. N. 1975. Use of herbicides in the establishment of small fruit crops. Hortscience 10:38.Google Scholar
Unland, R. D., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 2000. Imazamox and diphenylether herbicide interactions in soybean (Glycine max). Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 103:111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, KS: Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Pp. 159–161, 319–326, 331–333, 397–399.Google Scholar
Warmund, M. R. and Patterson, W. K. 1986. Vegetative and fruiting response of grapes to chlorsulfuron and oryzalin. Hortscience 21:250–252.Google Scholar
Ying, G. G. and Williams, B. 2000. Dissipation of herbicides in soil and grapes in a south Australian vineyard. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 78:283–289.Google Scholar
Zabadal, T. J. and Dittmer, T. W. 1994. Setting priorities for vine management in new vineyard planting. Proc. 9th Ann. Midwest Reg. Grape Wine Conf. 9:63–66.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Hamill, A. S., and Weaver, S. E. 1995. Antagonism and synergism between herbicides: trend from previous studies. Weed Technol. 9:86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar