Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:24:46.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Allan S. Hamill ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Kevin Chandler ,
Peter H. Sikkema ,
François J. Tardif ,
Anil Shrestha  and
Clarence J. Swanton
Allan S. Hamill
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON, Canada NOR 1GO
Stevan Z. Knezevic
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Kevin Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, ON, Canada NOP 2CO
François J. Tardif
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Anil Shrestha
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
Clarence J. Swanton*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The development of glufosinate-resistant corn represents a new weed management system for corn growers. Field experiments were conducted from 1995 to 1997 at four locations in southwestern Ontario. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of timing of weed control relative to the growth stage of corn with glufosinate applied alone or in combination with residual herbicides. Control of all species tested improved with the addition of atrazine plus dicamba to glufosinate, applied from the two- to eight-leaf stage of corn growth. Based on a 90% weed dry matter reduction, glufosinate with atrazine plus dicamba controlled common ragweed, common lambsquarters, and pigweed species at the three-leaf stage of corn and yellow foxtail, barnyardgrass, and large crabgrass at the two-, four-, and eight-leaf stage of corn, respectively. Weed control with glufosinate alone was improved when applied at the later growth stages of corn. Glufosinate applied alone at the four-leaf stage of corn controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarters, whereas pigweed species were controlled effectively at the eight-leaf stage of corn growth. Corn grain yield was consistently higher when glufosinate was applied in combination with residual herbicides, compared to glufosinate alone. Glufosinate in combination with residual herbicides applied to corn at the three- to five-leaf stage may represent the best timing for weed control. Our data suggested that a tank mixture of glufosinate with other postemergence residual herbicides or a split application of glufosinate in combination with cultivation may be required for weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn.

Keywords

AtrazinedicambaSAN 582 (proposed name, dimethenamid), 2-chloro-N-[(1-methyl-2-methoxy)ethyl]-N-(2,4-dimethyl-thien-3-yl)-acetamideglufosinatemetolachlorredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #3 AMAREcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEALyellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. # SETGLlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCRcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBELcorn, Zea mays L.Integrated weed managementDAE, days after emergenceDM, dry matterHRC, herbicide-resistant cropsIWM, integrated weed managementPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 578 - 585
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Field Crop Recommendations. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Publ. 296. 91 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Guide To Weed Control. Toronto, ON, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Publ. 75. 300 p.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993a. The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-amonium. Weed Res. 33: 139–147.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. M., Swanton, C. J., Hall, J. C., and Mersey, B. G. 1993b. The influence of soil moisture, simulated rainfall, and time of application on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res. 33: 149–160.Google Scholar
Bellinder, R. R., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 1985. Mode of action investigations with the herbicide HOE-39866 and SV-0224. Weed Sci. 33: 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellinder, R. R., Lyons, R. E., Scheckler, S. E., and Wilson, H. P. 1987. Cellular alterations resulting from foliar applications of HOE-39866. Weed Sci. 35: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berzsenyi, Z., Kopacsi, J., Arendas, T., Bonis, P., and Lap, D. Q. 1998. Threeyears experiences about the weed control efficacy of glufosinate in transgenic maize. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38: 1.14.Google Scholar
Bosnic, C. A. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45: 276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. M. and Bootsma, A. 1993. Crop Heat Units for Corn and Other Warm-season Crops in Ontario. Ministry of Agriculture and Food and University of Guelph Fact Sheets Order No. 93-119, AGDEX 111/31.Google Scholar
Hall, R. M., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40: 441–447.Google Scholar
Johnson, G.W., Bradley, P. R., and Hart, S. E. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate- and glufosinate-tolerant crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38: 1.15.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amarathus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42: 568–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35: 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Sikkema, P. H., Tardif, F., Hamill, A. S., Chandler, K., and Swanton, C. J. 1998. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of RPA 201772 for preemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 12: 670–676.Google Scholar
Logusch, E. W., Walker, D. M., McDonald, J. F., and Franz, J. E. 1991. Inhibition of plant glutamine syntheses by substituted phosphinothricins. Plant Physiol. 95: 1057–1062.Google Scholar
Mersey, B. G., Hall, C. J., Anderson, D. M., and Swanton, C. J. 1990. Factors affecting the herbicidial activity of glufosinate-ammonium: absorption, translocation, and metabolism in barley and green foxtail. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37: 90–98.Google Scholar
Moll, S. 1997. Commercial experience and benefits from glyphosate tolerant crops. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3: 931–940.Google Scholar
Owen, M. 1997. North American developments in herbicide tolerant crops. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3: 955–963.Google Scholar
Rasche, E. and Gadsby, M. 1997. Glufosinate amonium tolerant crops—international commercial developments and experiences. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3: 941–946.Google Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A. 1990. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models. New York: Dekker. 241 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems, Inc. 1,290 p.Google Scholar
Shelp, B. J., Swanton, C. J., Mersey, B. G., and Hall, J. C. 1991. Glufosinate (phosphinothricin) inhibition of nitrogen metabolism in barley and green foxtail plants. J. Plant Physiol. 139: 605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikkema, P., Knezevic, S. Z., Tardif, F., Hamill, A., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Biologically effective dose and selectivity of SAN1269H for weed control in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 13: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5: 648–656.Google Scholar
Wendler, C., Barniske, M., and Wild, A. 1990. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis and photorespiration of C3 and C4 plants. Photosynth. Res. 24: 55–61.Google Scholar
Wild, A., Sauer, H., and Ruhle, W. 1987. The effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis. I. Inhibition of photosynthesis and accumulation of ammonia. Z. Nat. forsch. 42: 263–269.Google Scholar