Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:11:19.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance from Soil-Applied RPA 201772

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Christy L. Sprague
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
James J. Kells
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Donald Penner*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1996, 1997, and 1998 to evaluate weed control and corn tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Treatments alone and in tank mixtures with other corn herbicides were applied preemergence (PRE) at two locations with conventional tillage and at early preplant (EPP) and PRE application timings in no-tillage corn. RPA 201772 was applied alone and in tank mixtures with one-half the typical field rates of other PRE corn herbicides. In conventional tillage experiments in 1996, 1997, and at one location in 1998, all treatments containing RPA 201772 provided > 90% control of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, common ragweed, and velvetleaf. In two no-tillage experiments, common lambsquarters and velvetleaf control was > 90%, regardless of application timing. However, control of redroot pigweed and common ragweed varied among years and application timings. Weed control was more variable from herbicide treatments applied EPP compared with the PRE application timing. Giant foxtail control in both tillage systems was rate, timing, and year dependent. RPA 201772 rates higher than 79 g/ha controlled giant foxtail > 85% at three of five locations. At one location, tank mixtures with RPA 201772 increased giant foxtail control. Corn injury occurred in one of two conventional tillage locations and at the no-tillage location in both 1996 and 1997. Injury was most commonly observed in coarse-textured soils with low clay and organic matter and was more severe with higher rates of RPA 201772. Increased corn injury was also observed when RPA 201772 was combined with acetochlor plus dicloramid or BAYFOE 5043 plus metribuzin. Corn injury from RPA 201772 occurred at application rates above the proposed rate for use on corn. In some cases, severe injury to corn reduced corn yield. Injury to corn from RPA 201772 was not unique to any tillage system and was site, year, and rate dependent.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bhowmik, P. C. and Prostak, R. G. 1996. Activity of EXP 31130A in annual weed control in field corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:13.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1991. EPP atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 5:6671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curvey, S. E. and Kapusta, G. 1996. Corn weed control with EXP31130A. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:5758.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W. and Stahlman, P. W. 1997. Efficacy of RPA 201772 alone and in combinations in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:81.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., DeFelice, M. S., and Holman, C. S. 1997. Application timing affects weed control with metolachlor plus atrazine in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:207211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. L., Prisbylla, M. P., Cromartie, T. H., Dagarin, D. P., Howard, S. W., Provan, W. M., Ellis, M. K., Fraser, T., and Mutter, L. C. 1997. The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Weed Sci. 45:601609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, B. M. and Pallett, K. E. 1996. RPA 201772 for weed control in maize. Pestic. Outlook 2932.Google Scholar
Luscombe, B. M., Vrabel, T. E., Paulsgroves, M. D., Cramp, S., Cain, P., Gamblin, A., and Millet, J. C. 1994. RPA 201772: a new broad spectrum PRE herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:5758.Google Scholar
Mosier, D. G., Duckworth, W., Watteyne, K. K., King, L. L., and Wrucke, M. A. 1995. Efficacy of EXP31130A in conventional and no-till corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:74.Google Scholar
Obermeier, M. R., Slack, C. H., Martin, J. R., and Witt, W. W. 1995. Evaluations of EXP31130A—a new PRE corn herbicide. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:25.Google Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Sheekey, M., and Veerasekaran, P. 1998. The mode of action of RPA 201772. 1. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:113124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallett, K. E., Little, J. P., Veerasekaran, P., and Viviani, F. 1997. Extended summary new perspective in mechanisms of herbicide action. Pestic. Sci. 50:8384.3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, R. L. 1985. Control systems for triazine-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.) in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci. 33:400404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, L. and Penner, D. 1990. Factors affecting choloracetanilide injury to corn. Weed Technol. 4:904906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, J. F. and Harvey, R. G. 1989. Woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in (Zea mays) with pendimethalin/triazine combinations and cultivation. Weed Sci. 37:405411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Feist, D. A., and Retzinger, E. J. 1997. SAMOA: one company's approach to herbicide-resistant weed management. Pestic. Sci. 51:367370.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simkins, G. S., Lengkeek, V. H., Duckworth, W., and Vrabel, T. E. 1995. Effect of application timing on performance of EXP 31130A for field corn weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:25.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Hart, S. E. 1997. PRE broadleaf control and crop tolerance in imidazolinone-resistant and -susceptible corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:118122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veilleux, D. P., Lavoy, J. D., Duckworth, W., and Christian, M. L. 1995. Efficacy of EXP31130A tank mixtures in conventional and no-till corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:75.Google Scholar
Vrabel, T. E., Jensen, J. O., Wrucke, M. A., and Hicks, C. 1995. EXP31130A: a new preemergent herbicide for corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:2425.Google Scholar
Weed Science Society of America. 1998. Herbicide Handbook. Supplement to 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 66 p.Google Scholar
Wright, T. R., Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Dissipation and water activation of UCC-C4243. Weed Sci. 43:149155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrucke, M. A., King, L. L., and Veilleux, D. P. 1997. Effect of cultivation on performance of RPA 201772 in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:17.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Simmons, F. W. 1998. Performance of PRE applications of RPA 201772 in corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:1.24.Google Scholar