Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:38:17.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and Wild Grape (Vitis spp.) Control in Fraser Fir

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert J. Richardson ,
Michael W. Marshall ,
Robert E. Uhlig  and
Bernard H. Zandstra
Robert J. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Michael W. Marshall
Affiliation:
Edisto Research and Extension Center, Blackville, SC 29817
Robert E. Uhlig
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Bernard H. Zandstra
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Virginia creeper and wild grape are troublesome perennial vines that often infest Christmas tree plantations. Field studies were conducted to evaluate Fraser fir injury and Virginia creeper and wild grape control with directed applications of triclopyr (1,680 g ai/ha) alone and in combination with 2,4-D (1,120 g ai/ha), clopyralid (280 g ai/ha), and halosulfuron (36 g ai/ha). Additional treatments included 2,4-D, clopyralid, glyphosate (1,120 g ai/ha), halosulfuron, hexazinone (560 g ai/ha), mesotrione (105 g ai/ha), and sulfometuron (71 g ai/ha) applied alone; and a mixture of hexazinone plus mesotrione. In the triclopyr-containing treatments, Fraser fir injury ranged from 6 to 13% at 1 mo after treatment (MAT) and was 4 to 8% at 11 MAT. Leader growth was not impacted by the herbicide treatments. At 11 MAT, all triclopyr-containing treatments controlled Virginia creeper 93 to 98% and wild grape 98 to 100%, which was greater than the control observed with glyphosate at 63 and 59%, respectively. Virginia creeper and wild grape control with 2,4-D was 88 to 90%. Clopyralid, halosulfuron, hexazinone, hexazinone plus mesotrione, mesotrione, and sulfometuron provided less than 66% control of both perennial vines. Directed applications of triclopyr-containing treatments or 2,4-D were effective management tools for selective removal of wild grape and Virginia creeper from Fraser fir Christmas tree plantations. Additional research is needed on the potential sensitivity of other commonly grown Christmas tree species to triclopyr-containing treatments.

Keywords

Clopyralidglyphosatehalosulfuronhexazinonemesotrionesulfometurontriclopyr2,4-DVirginia creeper, Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. PRTQUwild grape, Vitis spp. VITSPFraser fir, Abies fraseri (Pursh) PoirPerennial vinessilvicultureChristmas treesconifercompetitionplantation
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 184 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2004. Grape Crop Germplasm Committee Genetic Vulnerability Statement 2004. National Plant Germplasm System. http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/cgc_reports/grape2004vulnerability.html. Accessed: October 3, 2008.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2006. Garlon 3A herbicide label. Indianapolis. IN:. Dow AgroSciences LLC.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. J. and Jett, J. B. 1995. Seed source variation for growth quality traits of Fraser fir Christmas trees: rotation age results. South. J. Appl. For 19:157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H., Spetich, M. A., and Heiligmann, R. B. 1989. Effects of frequency of chemical weed control on growth and quality of Christmas trees. North. J. Appl. For 6:15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenburg, L. R., Whigham, D. F., Teramura, A. H., and Forseth, I. N. 1993. Effects of vine competition on availability of light, water, and nitrogen to a tree host (Liquidambar styraciflua). Am. J. Bot 80:244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groninger, J. W., Stein, H. D., Zedaker, S. M., and Smith, D. W. 1998. Growth response and cost comparisons for precommerical thinning methods of Appalachian oak stump sprout clumps. South. J. Appl. For 22:19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, T. E. and Walkowiak, J. T. 1988. Management impacts on Christmas tree returns. North. J. Appl. For 5:51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. P. and Radosevich, S. R. 1985. Herbicide tolerance in relation to growth and stress in conifers. Weed Sci 33:472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhns, L. J. and Harpster, T. L. 2004. Evaluation of flumioxazin on Fraser fir. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc 58:43–44.Google Scholar
Mead, D. J. 2005. Opportunities for improving plantation productivity. How much? How quickly? How realistic. Biomass Bioenerg 28:249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. H. and Miller, K. V. 2005. Forest Plants of the Southeast and Their Wildlife Uses, Revised Edition. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Newton, M., Cole, E. C., McCormack, M. L. Jr., and White, D. E. 1992. Young spruce–fir forest released by herbicides II. Conifer response to residual hardwoods and overstocking. North. J. Appl. For 9:130–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olmo, H. P. 1996. The origin and domestication of vinifera grape. Pages 31–43. in McGovern, P., Fleming, S. J., and Katz, S. H., editors. The Origin and Ancient History of Wine. London: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Roncoroni, E. J., Conard, S. G., and McHenry, W. B. 1980. Seasonal tolerance of six coniferous species to eight foliage-active herbicides. Forest Sci 26:3–9.Google Scholar
Rose, R. and Ketchum, J. S. 2003. Interaction of initial seedling diameter, fertilization, and weed control on Douglas-fir growth over the first four years after planting. Ann. For. Sci 60:625–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff 2007. Official Soil Series Descriptions, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html. Accessed: February 4, 2007.Google Scholar
Tworkoski, T. J. and Young, R. S. 1989. Rate and time of triclopyr application to control of Virginia creeper in a peach orchard. HortScience 25:443–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tworkoski, T. J., Young, R. S., and Sterrett, J. P. 1988. Control of Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia): effects of carrier volume on toxicity and distribution of triclopyr. Weed Technol 2:31–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA–NASS] United States Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service 2007. Nursery Crops—2006 Summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/NursProd/NursProd-09-26-2007.pdf. Accessed: August 6, 2008.Google Scholar
Uva, R. H., Neal, J. C., and DiTomaso, J. M. 1997. Weeds of the Northeast. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 397.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. G., Little, K. M., Richardson, B., and McNabb, K. 2006. The role of vegetation management for enhancing productivity of the world's forests. Forestry 79:57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar