Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:33:00.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Control in Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Karen A. Renner  and
Gary E. Powell
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Gary E. Powell
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Mich. State Univ., E. Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Velvetleaf control in sugarbeet by clomazone and commercially available sugarbeet herbicides was investigated in greenhouse and field studies. In greenhouse studies, clomazone at 0.07 and 0.04 kg ai ha-1 controlled 97 and 69% of velvetleaf, respectively, with little visible sugarbeet injury. Adding clomazone to pyrazon, TCA, ethofumesate, pyrazon plus TCA, or TCA plus ethofumesate increased velvetleaf control but increased visible sugarbeet injury. In field studies, clomazone at 0.07 kg ha-1 did not enhance sugarbeet injury. However, velvetleaf was not controlled by clomazone alone or clomazone plus pyrazon, ethofumesate, combinations of pyrazon plus TCA, pyrazon plus ethofumesate, or pyrazon plus TCA plus ethofumesate. Cycloate preplant incorporated plus pyrazon preemergence followed by postemergence herbicides controlled velvetleaf in all 3 yr of research. Postemergence herbicides increased velvetleaf control from soil-applied herbicides in 1987 and 1988.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl)-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonecycloate, S-ethyl cyclohexylethylcarbamothioateethofumesate, (±)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethyl-5-benzofuranyl methanesulfonatepyrazon, 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinoneTCA, trichloroacetic acidsugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ♯ ABUTHClomazonecycloateethofumesatepyrazonABUTH
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 97 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dawson, J. H. 1974. Full season weed control in sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 22:330–335.Google Scholar
2. Kapusta, G. 1985. Evaluation of fenoxan, imazaquin, and AC263,499 for weed control in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 40:86.Google Scholar
3. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27: 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Schweizer, E. E. 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 31:5–8.Google Scholar
5. Schweizer, E. E., and Bridge, L. D. 1982. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference in sugarbeets. Weed Sci. 30:514–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Schweizer, E. E., and Lauridson, T. C. 1985. Powell Amaranth (Amaranthus powellii) interference in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 33:518–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Spencer, N. R. 1984. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) malvaceae history and economic impact in the USA. Econ. Bot. 38:407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Thelen, K. D. 1987. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) control and off-target injury with clomazone. MS. thesis. Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
10. Wicks, G. A., and Wilson, R. G. 1983. Control of weeds in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris) with hand hoeing and herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 493–499.Google Scholar