Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:25:28.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) Response to Corn (Zea mays) Hybrid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gregory J. Roggenkamp ,
Stephen C. Mason  and
Alex R. Martin
Gregory J. Roggenkamp
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Stephen C. Mason*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2-yr study was conducted near Mead, NE, to determine the interaction of six corn (Zea mays) hybrids having different heights and leaf angles and four herbicide rates on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) biomass rating and seed production. Corn hybrid grain yields averaged over herbicide rates differed by up to 1,100 kg/ha in 1993 and 3,000 kg/ha in 1994, yet similar grain yield reductions occurred for all hybrids as herbicide rate decreased. Corn hybrids differed in suppression of weed growth and seed production, but suppression differences among hybrids were not consistent across years. Plots with the very tall, erect-leaf hybrid had 7.4 velvetleaf plants/m2, whereas other hybrids had 8.6 to 10.1 plants/m2. Plots with the very tall, erect-leaf hybrid also produced the lowest quantity of velvetleaf seeds of 23,100 seeds/m2 versus 25,100 to 30,700 seeds/m2 for plots with other hybrids. Erect-leaf hybrids suppressed weeds more effectively than horizontal-leaf hybrids. Corn hybrids had less effect on early- Fand late-season weed densities and biomass ratings and on seed production than herbicide application. Selection among current corn hybrids as a tool in integrated weed management will have a small or inconsistent influence on weed suppression.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamideatrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminegreen foxtail, Setaria viridis # SETVIvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. # ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L.Grain yieldherbicideintegrated weed controlreduced inputweed seed productionweed competitionABUTH, SETVIGDD, growing degree daysIFS, Illinois Foundation Seed
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 304 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, V. L. and McLean, R. A. 1974. Design of Experiments: A realistic approach. New York: Marcel Dekker. 418 p.Google Scholar
Bello, I. A., Owen, M.D.K., and Hatterman-Valenti, H. M. 1995. Effect of shade on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) growth, seed production and dormancy. Weed Technol. 9: 452–455.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1994. Differential competitive ability of winter wheat cultivars against downy brome. Agron. J. 86: 649–654.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. 1992. Crop Losses to Weeds in the United States. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 403 p.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1992. Integrating weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J. 84: 973–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Doll, J. D., Proost, R. T., and Visocky, M. R. 1995. Integrating mechanical weeding with reduced herbicide use in conservation tillage corn production systems. Agron. J. 87: 507–512.Google Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Sparrow, D. 1995. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition and economic thresholds in conventional and notillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 43: 81–87.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. G. 1971. Leaf angles, leaf area, and canopy photosynthesis. Crop Sci. 11: 482–485.Google Scholar
Duvick, D. N. 1992. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica. 37: 69–79.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M. J. 1988. Weed seed populations in ridge and conventional tillage. Weed Sci. 36: 500–503.Google Scholar
Ford, G. T. and Pleasant, J. Mt. 1994. Competitive abilities of six corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids with four weed control practices. Weed Technol. 8: 124–128.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Roth, G. W. 1993. Effect of prior year's weed control on herbicide effectiveness in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 611–614.Google Scholar
Khedir, K. D. 1979. Velvetleaf Seed Populations and Control in Soil. , University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. 56 p.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. 90: 787–792.Google Scholar
Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1984. Cultural practices affecting seasonlong weed control in irrigated corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32: 460–467.Google Scholar
Mulder, T. A. and Doll, J. D. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 382–389.Google Scholar
Nebraska Cooperative Extension Service. 1999. A 1999 Guide for Herbicide Use in Nebraska. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska EC99-130-D. 97 p.Google Scholar
Nieto, J. and Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Corn-foxtail competition under various production conditions. Agron. J. 53: 1–5.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W. and Hanway, J. J. 1982. How a Corn Plant Develops. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service Special Rep. 48. 21 p.Google Scholar
Roberts, H. A. and Porter, M. E. 1980. Emergence patterns of weed seedlings in relation to cultivation and rainfall. Weed Res. 20: 377–386.Google Scholar
Roeth, F., Moomaw, R., Martin, A., and Burnside, O. 1983. Velvetleaf. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln Cooperative Extension Publ. NebGuide, G83-681. 4 p.Google Scholar
Roggenkamp, G. J. 1997. Hybrid Selection for Reducing Herbicide Rates in Corn. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE. 186 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1982. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 923 p.Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M., McCullough, D. E., and Sawyer, L. M. 1994. Physiological basis of the genetic improvement of corn. In Slafer, G. A., ed. Genetic Improvement of Field Crops. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 183–236.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1993. Effect of preplant tillage, post-plant cultivation, and herbicides on weed density in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortmann, C. S. 1993. Contribution of bean morphological characteristics to weed suppression. Agron. J. 85: 840–843.Google Scholar
Zanin, G. and Sattin, M. 1988. Threshold level and seed production of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medicus) in maize. Weed Res. 28: 347–352.Google Scholar