Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:49:30.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Activated Carbon to Reduce Phytotoxicity of Imazaquin to Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Fred H. Yelverton ,
A. Douglas Worsham  and
Gerald F. Peedin
Fred H. Yelverton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
A. Douglas Worsham
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Gerald F. Peedin
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1987-89, field experiments were conducted to evaluate rates of activated carbon in transplant water to reduce injury to tobacco from imazaquin. Rates of activated carbon were 0, 2.2, 4.5, and 9 kg ha−1 in 1987 and 0, 9, 18, and 36 kg ha−1 in 1988-89. Imazaquin rates were 0, 0.3, and 0.6 kg ha−1 applied over-the-top immediately after transplanting. Results indicated that 9 kg ha−1 of activated carbon was the minimum amount to reduce injury from imazaquin. No additional protection was achieved with rates above 9 kg ha−1, whereas lower rates appeared to offer less protection based on visible stunting ratings.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidtobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.Activated charcoalherbicide injuryherbicide safenerherbicide antidote
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 663 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bowman, D. T., Tart, A. G., Wernsman, E. A., and Corbin, T. C. 1988. Revised North Carolina grade index for flue-cured tobacco. Tob. Sci. 32:39–40.Google Scholar
2. Bryson, C. T. 1985. Economic losses due to weeds. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:116–118.Google Scholar
3. Cheremisinoff, P. N. and Ellerbusch, F. 1978. Carbon adsorption applications. p. 1–52 in Carbon Adsorption Handbook. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
4. Coffey, D. L. and Warren, G. F. 1969. Inactivation of herbicides by activated carbon and other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 17:16–19.Google Scholar
5. Fitzgerald, C. H. and Fortson, J. C. 1979. Herbaceous weed control with hexazinone in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations. Weed Sci. 27:583–588.Google Scholar
6. Glaze, N. C., Phatak, S. C., and Thredgill, E. D. 1979. Spot application of activated charcoal to increase herbicide selectivity on watermelons. HortScience 14:632–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hagood, E. S. Jr. and Komm, D. A. 1987. Effect of rate and timing of imazaquin application on the growth and yield of flue-cured tobacco. Tob. Sci. 31:1–4.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, W. R., Stahr, H. M., and Smith, W. C. 1969. Automated determination of reducing sugars and nicotine alkaloids on the same extract of tobacco leaf. Tob. Sci. 13:13–15.Google Scholar
9. Hawks, S. N. Jr. 1978. Principles of flue-cured tobacco production. 2nd ed. S. N. Hawks, Raleigh, NC. p. 154–156.Google Scholar
10. Hawks, S. N. Jr. and Collins, W. K. 1983. Principles of flue-cured tobacco production. Hawks and Collins, Raleigh, NC. p. 205–220.Google Scholar
11. Hopen, H. J. 1967. Tomato protection from triazine damage with activated carbon. Abstr. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 22:39–40.Google Scholar
12. Jolley, E. R. 1985. Control of emerged weeds by acifluorfen—(Blazer 2L) when used in conjunction with FMC-57020 and imazaquin. Abstr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:70.Google Scholar
13. Kratky, B. A., Coffey, D. L., and Warren, G. F. 1970. Activated carbon root dips on transplanted strawberries. Weed Sci. 18:577–579.Google Scholar
14. Kratky, B. A. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Activated carbon-vermiculite mixture for increasing herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 19:79–81.Google Scholar
15. Kratky, B. A. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Tomato protection from atrazine residue by activated carbon root dips. HortScience 5:179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Lee, W. O. 1973. Clean grass seed crops established with activated carbon bands and herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:537–541.Google Scholar
17. Lewis, W. M., York, A. C., Coble, H. D., and Worsham, A. D. 1989. Chemical control in field crops. p. 223–245 in 1988 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. Coll. Agric. Life Sci. N. C. State Univ. Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
18. Lignowski, E. M. 1985. Imazaquin: Development status and plans. Abstr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:63.Google Scholar
19. Martin, R. K. 1984. Scepter herbicide (AC 252,214) results of 1983 field trials in the southern region. Abstr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 37:377.Google Scholar
20. Mehlich, A. 1984. Photometric determination of humic matter in soils, a proposed method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15:1417–1422.Google Scholar
21. Norris, B. E. Jr. and Walker, R. H. 1984. Responses of weed species (Fabaceae) to DPX-f6025 and AC 252,214 applied postemergence. Abstr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:70.Google Scholar
22. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1978. Herbicides and activated carbon for weed control in direct-seeded asparagus (Asparagus offincinalis). Weed Sci. 26:284–286.Google Scholar
23. O'Neill, J. B., Congleton, W. F., Dunn, J. C., Hackworth, H. M., Huffman, F. R., Mathews, R. S., Muzyk, K. R., Walls, F. R., Watkins, R. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1985. Imazaquin: Weed control in soybeans in the southern region. Abstr. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 38:62.Google Scholar
24. Peedin, G. F., Smith, W. D., Yelverton, F. H., Melton, T. A., Southern, P. S., Toussaint, W. D., Perry, K., Johnson, G., Watkins, R. W. 1989. Tobacco Information. p. 40–48. N. C. Agric. Ext. Serv. Bull. Ag. 187, N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
25. Rodrigues, F. B. and Worsham, A. D. 1973. Herbicides for flue-cured tobacco. I. Weed control, methods of soil incorporation, yield, and value of tobacco. Tob. Sci. 17:155–158.Google Scholar
26. Steele, R.F.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, NY. p. 377–400.Google Scholar
27. Strek, H. J., Weber, J. B., Shea, P. J., Mrozek, E. Jr., and Overcash, M. R. 1981. Reduction of polychlorinated biphenyl toxicity and uptake of Carbon-14 activity by plants through the use of activated carbon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:288–293.Google Scholar
28. Walls, F. R. Jr., Worsham, A. D., Collins, W. K., Corbin, F. T., and Bradley, J. R. 1987. Evaluation of imazaquin for weed control in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). 1987. Weed Sci. 35:824–829.Google Scholar
29. William, R. D. and Romanowski, R. R. 1972. Vermiculite and activated carbon adsorbents protect direct-seeded tomatoes from partially selective herbicides. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97:245–249.Google Scholar
30. Worsham, A. D. 1970. Herbicide performance in flue-cured tobacco. Weed Sci. 18:648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Yelverton, F. H., Worsham, A. D., and Peedin, G. F. 1992. Activated carbon reduces tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) injury from soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol. 6:310–316.Google Scholar