Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:30:48.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of rhizoma perennial peanut to glyphosate and triclopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2020

Logan J. Martin ,
Brent A. Sellers Open the ORCID record for Brent A. Sellers [Opens in a new window] ,
Pratap Devkota Open the ORCID record for Pratap Devkota [Opens in a new window] ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Ramon G. Leon Open the ORCID record for Ramon G. Leon [Opens in a new window]  and
João M.B. Vendramini Open the ORCID record for João M.B. Vendramini [Opens in a new window]
Logan J. Martin
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
Brent A. Sellers*
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Florida–Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
Pratap Devkota
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, University of Florida–Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, West Florida Research and Education Center, Department of Agronomy, Jay, FL, USA
Jason A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Professor and Director, University of Florida–Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants, Department of Agronomy, Gainesville, FL, USA
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
João M.B. Vendramini
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Florida–Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agronomy, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Brent A. Sellers, Professor and Director, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, 3401 Experiment Station, Ona, FL33865 Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rhizoma perennial peanut (RPP) is well adapted to the Gulf Coast region of the United States, but its varietal tolerance to glyphosate and triclopyr is not well defined. The research was conducted to determine the effect of various rates of glyphosate and triclopyr on established RPP, and the response of common RPP varieties to these herbicides. The RPP sward was approximately 7 yr younger at Zolfo Springs than at the Ona location. RPP showed moderate tolerance to glyphosate and triclopyr application, and injury level did not differ with the age of RPP sward. However, biomass production was negatively influenced by the age of the RPP sward. Overall, injury from glyphosate applications did not exceed 40% at either site. The glyphosate rate for 20% biomass reduction was predicted to be 0.53 and 2.17 kg ae ha−1 at Zolfo Springs and Ona, respectively. RPP injury from triclopyr was greater at the Zolfo Springs location than at Ona, and the triclopyr rate predicted to result in a 20% biomass reduction was 0.45 and 0.99 kg ae ha−1 at the Zolfo Springs and Ona locations, respectively. There was a difference on RPP varieties response to glyphosate and triclopyr application. ‘Florigraze’ and ‘Ona 33’ were less tolerant to glyphosate compared to ‘UF-Tito’ and ‘Ecoturf’ at 30 d after treatment. Likewise, UF-Tito and Florigraze were less tolerant to triclopyr compared to Ona 33 and Ecoturf. Overall, Florigraze showed highest injury and at least 2-fold reduction on biomass compared to the other three varieties from glyphosate or triclopyr application. Results from this research indicate that glyphosate and triclopyr appear to be safe to apply to long-established RPP stands, but herbicide rate and RPP varieties should be considered if stands are <5 yr old.

Keywords

Glyphosatetriclopyrrhizoma perennial peanutArachis glabrata BenthForage cropherbicide injuryperennial peanut varieties
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2021 , pp. 525 - 531
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Mark VanGessel, University of Delaware

References

Ball, DM, Hoveland, CS (2015) Southern forages, modern concepts for forage crop management, 5th ed. Corners, GA: International Plant Nutrition Institute Google Scholar
Cook, B, Pengelly, B, Brown, S, Donnelly, J, Eagles, D, Franco, A, Hanson, J, Mullen, B, Partridge, I, Peters, M, Schultze-Kraft, R (2005). Tropical forages: An interactive selection tool. http://www.tropicalforages.info/key/Forages/Media/Html/About_us.htm. Accessed: July 20, 2020Google Scholar
Cruz-Hipolito, H, Rojano-Delgado, A, Dominguez-Valenzuela, JA, Heredia, A, Castro, MD, Prado, R (2011) Glyphosate tolerance by Clitoria ternatea and Neonotonia wightii plants involves differential adsorption and translocation of the herbicide. Plant Soil 347:221–230 Google Scholar
Dwyer, GT, O’Hare, PJ, Cook, BG (1989) Pinto’s peanut: A ground cover for orchards. Queensland Agr J 6:153–154 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Sellers, BA, Mudge, CR (2006) Evaluation of postemergent herbicides on rhizoma peanut injury and yield. Forage and Grazinglands 4:1–6 10.1094/FG-2006-0308-01-RSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J, Myer, R, Adesogan, AT, Carter, J, Sollenberger, L, Blount, A (2017) Annual warm-season legumes for Florida and the United States Gulf Coast: Forage Yield, Nutritional Composition, and Feeding Value. EDIS Publication AN259. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AN/AN25900.pdf. Accessed: July 15, 2020Google Scholar
Graham, PH, Vance, CP (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–877 Google ScholarPubMed
Mislevy, P, Williams, MJ, Blount, AS, Quesenberry, KH (2007) Influence of harvest management on rhizoma perennial peanut production, nutritive value and persistence on flatwood soils. Forage and Grazinglands 5:1–10 Google Scholar
Quesenberry, KH, Blount, AR, Mislevy, P, French, EC, Williams, MJ, Prine, GM (2010) Registration of ‘UF Tito’ and ‘UF Peace’ rhizoma peanut cultivars with high dry matter yields, persistence, and disease tolerance. J Plant Regist 4:17–21 Google Scholar
Sellers, B, Ferrell, J (2018) Weed control in perennial peanut. EDIS Publication SS-AGR-261. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/WG/WG21600.pdf. Accessed: July 19, 2020Google Scholar
Sellers, BA, Devkota, P (2020) Weed management in pastures and rangeland-2020. EDIS Publication SS-AGR-08. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/WG/WG00600.pdf. Accessed: July 18, 2020Google Scholar
Valencia, E, Williams, MJ, Sollenberger, LE (1999) Yield and botanical composition of rhizoma peanut-grass swards treated with herbicides. Agron J 91:956–961 Google Scholar
Vendramini, J (2010) Forage evaluation and quality in Florida. Pages 92–105 in 21st Symposium on Florida Ruminant Nutrition. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ccc6/d61412cbc215a8bbcdaf140961e93016ec30.pdf. Accessed: July 21, 2020Google Scholar
Villarreal, M, Cochran, RC, Villalobos, L, Roja-Bourrillon, A, Rodriguez, R, Wickersham, TA (2005) Dry-matter yields and crude protein and rumen-degradable protein concentrations of three Arachis pintoi ecotypes at different stages of regrowth in the humid tropics. Grass Forage Sci 60.3:237–243Google Scholar
Williams, MJ, Chase, CC Jr, Hammond, AC (2004) Pasture management and forage utilization. Agron J 96:671–676 Google Scholar
Williams, MJ, Newman, YC, Blount, A (2017) Rhizoma perennial peanut. EDIS Publication SS-AGR-349. Gainesville: University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/AG/AG35800.pdf. Accessed: July 12, 2020Google Scholar