Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:25:22.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Meadow Foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis) to Two Sulfonylurea Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roger L. Sheley
Roger L. Sheley*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
*
Author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meadow foxtail is a rhizomatous grass widely grown for hay and pasture in wet meadows of the western United States and Canada. Two sulfonylurea herbicides, chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron-methyl, were evaluated for their effects on meadow foxtail biomass. Both herbicides were applied at four doses, 0.035, 0.070, 0.105, and 0.140 kg ai/ha, together with a control at each of two sites in October 2003. Treatments were replicated four times at each site and arranged in a randomized complete block design and sampled in July 2004 and 2005. Meadow foxtail biomass depended on site (P = 0.001) or year (P = 0.001), but not herbicide treatment (P = 0.182). No biomass production losses resulted from applying up to 0.14 kg/ha of either chlorsulfuron or metsulfuron-methyl on meadow foxtail, even in relatively high-pH soils.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuronmetsulfuron-methylmeadow foxtail, Alopecurus pratensis L.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 470 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Fairey, N. A. 1991. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, cutting frequency, and companion legume on herbage production and quality of four grasses. Can J. Plant Sci. 71:717–725.Google Scholar
Hannaway, D. B. and McGuire, W. S. 1981. Growing meadow foxtail for forage. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Oregon State University Extension Bulletin FS 264. 2.Google Scholar
Machac, J. 1995. The effect of the stand treatment by sulfonylureas on the grass seed yield. Rostlinna Vyroba 41:547–551.Google Scholar
Malik, N. 1990. Weed control during establishment and yield response of timothy phelum-pratense. Weed Technol. 4:598–605.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. G. 1985. Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York Marcel Dekker. 272.Google Scholar
Renz, M. J. and DiTomaso, J. M. 2006. Early season mowing improves the effectiveness of chlorsulfuron and glyphosate for control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium). Weed Technol. 20:32–36.Google Scholar
Rode, I. M. and Pringle, W. I. 1986. Growth, digestibility, and voluntary intake by yearling steers grazing timothy (Phleum pretense) or meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis) Pastures Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:463–472.Google Scholar
Sarmah, A. K., Kookana, R. S., Duffy, M. J., Alston, A. M., and Harch, B. D. 2000. Hydrolysis of triasulfuron, metsulfuron-methyl and chlorsulfuron in alkaline soil and aqueous solutions. Pest Manage. Sci. 56:463–471.Google Scholar
Schoth, H. A. 1945. Meadow foxtail. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Oregon State University Extension Bulletin No. 433. 3.Google Scholar
Tingle, J. N. and van Adrichem, M. C. J. 1974. Meadow foxtail lengthens the spring pasture season. Can. Agric. 74:26.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Palmquist, D. E., and Blank, R. R. 1998. The ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L). Weed Technol. 12:402–405.Google Scholar