Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T07:14:40.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Imidazolinone-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) to Diclosulam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Bailey  and
John W. Wilcut
William A. Bailey
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: john@[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate the tolerance of imidazolinone-resistant (IR) and non-IR corn cultivars to preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) treatments of diclosulam. Crop injury was evaluated early- (5 to 6 wk after planting [WAP]), mid- (10 to 11 WAP), and late-season (13 to 15 WAP). Early-season injury of IR corn was no more than 12% in systems that included diclosulam PRE or POST at 18, 27, or 36 g ai/ha. Early-season injury of non-IR corn ranged from 85 to 89% in systems that included diclosulam PRE at any rate. At the mid-season evaluation, crop injury to IR corn was 1% or less. Non-IR corn was injured 73 to 94% in systems that included diclosulam PRE, while systems that included diclosulam POST caused 45 to 58% injury at mid-season. At the late-season evaluation, non-IR corn was injured 56, 88, and 96% with diclosulam PRE at 18, 27, and 36 g/ha, respectively, whereas systems that included diclosulam POST had 11 to 14% injury. Injury to IR corn from diclosulam PRE or POST was not apparent at the late-season evaluation. Weed-free yield of IR corn treated with diclosulam was 6,490 to 6,850 kg/ha and was equivalent to or better than yield from IR corn treated only with atrazine plus metolachlor PRE. Yield from non-IR corn treated with any diclosulam-containing system did not exceed 3,770 kg/ha.

Keywords

Atrazinediclosulammetolachlorcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3242’, ‘Pioneer 3223’Crop injurycrop tolerancediscolorationstand reductionstuntingALS, acetolactate synthase [EC 4.1.3.18]IR, imidazolinone-resistantPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergenceWAP, weeks after planting
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 60 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2001. Strongarm herbicide supplemental label. EPA Reg. No. 62719-288. Indianapolis, IN: Dow AgroSciences. 4 p.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Swann, C. W., and Langston, V. B. 1999a. Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with diclosulam preemergence. Weed Technol. 13: 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Swann, C. W., and Langston, V. B. 1999b. Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and selected weeds to diclosulam. Weed Technol. 13: 771–776.Google Scholar
Bell, A. R., Hayes, R. M., and Mueller, T. C. 1998. Effects of Staple on IR and IT corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 17.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylureas. In Kearney, D. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 117–190.Google Scholar
Bowman, B. T., Wall, G. J., and King, D. J. 1993. Transport of herbicides and nutrients in surface runoff from corn cropland in southern Ontario. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74: 59–56.Google Scholar
Christensen, B. and Montgomery, J. 1992. Herbicides in drinking water sources: public health perspectives. Tech. Bull. 4-92. Ciba-Geigy Corporation. Agricultural, Environmental, and Public Affairs Department. Greensboro, NC. 4 p.Google Scholar
Currie, R. S., Kwon, C. S., and Penner, D. 1995. Magnitude of imazethapyr resistance of corn (Zea mays) hybrids with altered acetolactate synthase. Weed Sci. 43: 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, R. S. and Regehr, D. L. 1995. Methods of measuring the impact of the XA17 gene on imazethapyr injury in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 9: 676–681.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50: 227–246.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 299–313.Google Scholar
Fawcett, J. A. 1993. Imidazolinone resistant and tolerant corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 41.Google Scholar
Frans, R. R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant response to weed control practices. In Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society. pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Greaves, J. A., Rufener, G. K., Chang, M. T., and Koehler, P. H. 1993. Development of resistance to pursuit herbicide—the IT gene. Report of the 48th Corn and Sorghum Research Conference 48: 109–118.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41: 508–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. ed. 1998. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol. 7: 641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75: 153–155.Google Scholar
Moberg, W. K. 1990. Herbicides inhibiting branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis. Pestic. Sci. 29: 241–246.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, Halton, J. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1996. Effect of AC 263,222, imazethapyr, and nicosulfuron on weed control and imidazolinone-tolerant corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 10: 822–827.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. and Hayes, C. 1998. Peanuts: acres, yield, and production by county, North Carolina, 1996–1997. In 1998 North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Agricultural Statistics. p. 50.Google Scholar
Newhouse, K., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. 1991. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops. In Shaner, D. L. and O'Connor, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 139–150.Google Scholar
Retzinger, E. J. Jr. and Mallory-Smith, C. 1997. Classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol. 11: 384–393.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15: 360–364.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Bascomb, N. F., and Smith, W. 1996. Imidazolinone-resistant crops: selectivity, characterization, and management. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. CRC. Boca Raton, FL. pp. 143–157.Google Scholar
Siehl, D. L., Bengston, A. S., Brockman, J. P., Butler, J. H., Kraatz, G. W., Lamoreaux, R. J., and Subramanian, M. V. 1996. Patterns of crop-tolerance to herbicides inhibiting acetohydroxy acid synthase in commercial hybrids designed for tolerance to imidazolinones. Crop Sci. 36: 274–278.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Hart, S. E. 1997. Preemergence broadleaf weed control and crop tolerance in imidazolinone-resistant and susceptible corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11: 118–122.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. G. 1992. Pre-compliance Date Testing for Pesticides in Illinois' Surface Water Supplies. Springfield, IL: State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Rep. 026. 6 p.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Richburg, J. S. III, and Walls, F. R. 1999. Response of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and imidazolinone-resistant corn (Zea mays) to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 13: 484–488.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., Swann, C. W., Jordan, D. L., and Walls, F. R. Jr. 1995. Efficacy of imazethapyr in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) as affected by timing. Weed Sci. 43: 107–116.Google Scholar