Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:44:09.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Bentgrass (Agrostis) Species and Cultivars to Methiozolin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nicholas R. Hoisington ,
Michael L. Flessner ,
Marco Schiavon ,
J. Scott McElroy  and
James H. Baird
Nicholas R. Hoisington
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Michael L. Flessner
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
Marco Schiavon
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
J. Scott McElroy
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849
James H. Baird*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methiozolin is a new herbicide from South Korea currently under development in the United States for PRE and POST annual bluegrass control in bentgrass and most other cool- and warm-season turfgrasses. Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2012 at the University of California, Riverside, CA, and Auburn University, Auburn, AL, to evaluate the relative tolerance of three bentgrass species comprised of nine creeping bentgrass (CRBG) cultivars, velvet bentgrass (VBG) and colonial bentgrass (COBG) to methiozolin at 0, 0.6, 1.1, 2.2, 4.5 and 9.0 kg ai ha−1. Methiozolin was applied 7 wk after seeding, followed by a second application 5 wk later. Methiozolin rates that produced 25% injury (TI25) and 50% clipping dry weight reduction (GR50) relative to a nontreated control for each species or cultivar were calculated using four-parameter logistic regression. Turf injury rates at 21 d after second treatment (DAT2) were the most consistent in describing relative tolerance among bentgrass species. Overall, CRBG was more tolerant to methiozolin than VBG or COBG. After two applications, methiozolin rates that caused TI25 were 1.1, 0.2, and 0.3 kg ha−1 for CRBG (across all cultivars), VBG, and COBG, respectively. VBG and COBG were not tolerant of sequential methiozolin applications at rates necessary to control annual bluegrass under field conditions. Herbicide rates that caused TI25 and GR50 decreased with the second application. ‘Penn A-4’ CRBG exhibited the highest TI25 28 d after initial treatment (DAIT) at University of California at Riverside (4.5 kg ha−1), but only 2.5 kg ha−1 with two applications by 21 DAT2. All CRBG cultivars tested tolerated methiozolin at 0.5 kg ha−1, the recommended sequential use rate for putting greens in Korea.

Methiozolin es un herbicida nuevo proveniente de Korea del Sur que está actualmente siendo desarrollado en los Estados Unidos para el control PRE y POST de Poa annua en Agrostis spp. (bentgrass) y la mayoría de otros céspedes de clima frío y cálido. Se realizaron estudios de invernadero en 2012 en la Universidad de California, Riverside, California y en la Universidad Auburn, Auburn, Alabama, para evaluar la tolerancia relativa de tres especies de Agrostis incluyendo nueve cultivares de Agrostis stolonifera (CRBG), Agrostis canina (VBG) y Agrostis capillaris (COBG) a methiozolin a 0, 0.6, 1.1, 2.2, 4.5, y 9.0 kg ai ha−1. Methiozolin fue aplicado 7 semanas después de la siembra, seguido por una segunda aplicación 5 semanas después. Las dosis de methiozolin que produjeron 25% de daño (TI25) y una reducción del 50% en el peso seco (GR50) de los residuos de poda (clippings) en relación al testigo no-tratado para cada especie o cultivar fueron calculados usando una regresión logística de cuatro parámetros. El daño en el césped según la dosis a 21 d después del segundo tratamiento (DAT2) fue el más consistente al describir la tolerancia relativa entre especies de Agrostis. En general, CRBG fue más tolerante a methiozolin que VBG o COBG. Después de dos aplicaciones, las dosis de methiozolin que causaron TI25 fueron 1.1, 0.2, y 0.3 kg ha−1 para CRBG (promediado para todos los cultivares), VBG, y COBG, respectivamente. VBG y COBG no fueron tolerantes a aplicaciones secuenciales de methiozolin a dosis que son necesarias para el control de Poa annua bajo condiciones de campo. Las dosis de herbicida que causaron TI25 y GR50 disminuyeron con la segunda aplicación. CRBG ‘Penn A-4’ mostró la mayor TI25 28 d después del tratamiento inicial (DAIT) en la Universidad de California en Riverside (4.5 kg ha−1), pero solamente 2.5 kg ha−1 con dos aplicaciones a 21 DAT2. Todos los cultivares de CRBG evaluados toleraron methiozolin a 0.5 kg ha−1, la cual es la dosis secuencial recomendada para el uso en putting greens en Korea.

Keywords

Methiozolin, MRC-01, 5-(2,6-difluoro-benzyloxymethyl)-5-methyl-3-(3-methyl-thiophen-2-yl)-4,5-dihydro-isoxazoleannual bluegrass, Poa annua L.creeping bentgrass, Agrostis stolonifera L.colonial bentgrass, Agrostis capillaris L.velvet bentgrass, Agrostis canina L.Four-parameter logistic regressiongrowth reductionherbicide sensitivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 501 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2009) Bensumec™ 4 LF herbicide product label. PBI/Gordon Publication No. 845/8-2009. Kansas City, MO: PBI/Gordon Corporation. 3 pGoogle Scholar
Beard, J B (1973) Turfgrass: Science and Culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 658 pGoogle Scholar
Branham, B, Beasley, J (2007) PGRs: metabolism and plant responses. Golf Course Manag 75(7):95–99 Google Scholar
Brosnan, JT, Henry, GM, Breeden, GK, Cooper, GK, Serensits, TJ (2013) Methiozolin efficacy for annual bluegrass control on sand- and soil-based creeping bentgrass putting greens. Weed Technol 27:310–316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, EH, Zhang, X (2008) Applied physiology of natural and synthetic plant growth regulators on turfgrasses. Pages 171–200 in Pessarakli, M., ed. Handbook of Turfgrass Management and Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Google Scholar
Fagerness, MJ, Yelverton, FH (2000) Tissue production and quality of ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass as affected by seasonal application patterns of trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Sci 40:493–497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flessner, ML, Wehtje, G, McElroy, J (2013) Methiozolin absorption and translocation in annual bluegrass (Poa annua). Weed Sci 61:201–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, K, Hutzler, J, Tresch, S, Christiansen, N, Looser, L, Ehrhardt, T (2011) On the mode of action of the herbicides cinmethylin and 5-benzyloxymethyl-1,2-isoxazolines: putative inhibitors of plant tyrosine aminotransferase. Pest Manag Sci 68:482–492 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haguewood, JB, Moss, J, Xiong, X (2012) Efficacy and safety of methiozolin for pre-emergence control of annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) on creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting greens. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America. 105–27 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Han, KM, Kaminski, J (2012) Influence of methiozolin rates and application timings on Poa annua populations. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America. 355–25 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Hart, S (2012) Fall application regimes of methiozolin for annual bluegrass control in creeping bentgrass putting greens. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America. 254–18 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Henry, GM, Hart, S (2004) Velvet and creeping bentgrass tolerance to fenoxaprop. HortScience 39:1768–1770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, JA, Straw, C, Henry, G, Cooper, T, Beck, L, Brosnan, J, Breeden, G (2012) Fall applications of methiozolin for the control of annual bluegrass in sand-based and push-up greens. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America. 254–9 [Abstract]Google Scholar
Hwang, IT, Kim, HR, Jeon, DJ, Hong, KS, Song, JH, Cho, KY (2005) 5-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)oxymethyl-5-methyl-3-(3-methylthiophen-2-yl)-1,2-isoxazoline as a useful rice herbicide. J Agric Food Chem 53:8639–8643 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, BJ, Murphy, TR (1996) Suppression of a perennial subspecies of annual bluegrass (Poa annua spp. reptans) in a creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stonolifera) green with plant growth regulators. Weed Technol 10:705–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, JE (2005) Tolerance of three bentgrass species to velocity and reducing turfgrass injury with iron + nitrogen. 2005 Annual Research Report. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut. 80 pGoogle Scholar
Koo, SJ, Hwang, KH, Jeon, MS, Kim, SH, Lim, J, Lee, DG, Cho, NG (2013) Methiozolin [5-(2,6-difluorobenzyl)oxymethyl-5-methyl-3,3(3-methylthiophen-2-yl)-1,2-isoxazoline], a new annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) herbicide for turfgrasses. Pest Manag Sci. Wileyonlinelibrary.com DOI Google Scholar
Kreuser, WC, Soldat, DJ (2011) A growing degree day model to schedule trinexapac-ethyl applications on Agrostis stolonifera Golf Putting Greens. Crop Sci 51:2228–2236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JN, Koo, SJ, Hwang, KH, Hwang, IT, Jeon, DJ, Kim, HR (2007) Mode of action of a new isoxazoline compound. Pages 591–601 in Marmbe, B. et al., eds. Proceedings of the 21st Asian Pacific Weed Science Conference. Colombo, Sri Lanka Google Scholar
Lycan, DW, Hart, SE (2005) Cool-season turfgrass response to bispyribac-sodium. HortScience 40:1552–1555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, PE, Gòmez de Barrea, D (2012) Cool-season turfgrass reseeding intervals for methiozolin. Weed Technol 26:789–792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, PE, Gòmez de Barrea, D, Yu, J (2012) Selectivity of methiozolin for annual bluegrass control in creeping bentgrass as influenced by temperature and application timing. Weed Sci 61:209–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, SJ, Dernoeden, PH, Kaminski, JE (2006) Colonial, creeping, and velvet bentgrass tolerance to sodium-bispyribac. Page 85 in Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America. Ithaca, NY: Northeastern Weed Science Society. Vol.60 Google Scholar
McElroy, JS, Flessner, ML, Murphy, TR (2013) Bermudagrass growth regulation with flucarbazone. Int Turfgrass Soc Res J 12: In Press Google Scholar
McNulty, B, Koo, S, Askew, S (2011) Annual bluegrass control with methiozolin on golf putting greens in the United States and Korea. Page 87 in Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society. Ithaca, NY: Northeastern Weed Science Society. Vol.65 Google Scholar
Nam, JH, Hwang, K, Koo, S, Kim, C, Cho, C, Ko, YK (2012) Synthesis and herbicidal activities of enantiopure methiozolins. Bull Korean Chem Soc 33:297–300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Hart, PE (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose response relationships. Weed Tech 9:218–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straw, S, Henry, G, Cooper, T, Beck, L (2012) Variable response of creeping bentgrass cultivars to metamifop. Proc Crop Sci Soc Amer 102-4Google Scholar
Trappe, JM., Patton, AJ, Weisenberger, D, Breeden, G, Brosnan, J (2012) Methiozolin rate and spring application timing affect annual bluegrass control on putting greens. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America. 102–11. [Abstract]Google Scholar