Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:51:11.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swamp Dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) Management in Carrot Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher M. Konieczka ,
Jed B. Colquhoun  and
Richard A. Rittmeyer
Christopher M. Konieczka
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Jed B. Colquhoun*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Richard A. Rittmeyer
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of herbicides and carrot mowing for swamp dodder control. Herbicide evaluation indicated the highest carrot yield and lowest crop injury with pendimethalin compared to the industry standard linuron. Swamp dodder control with pendimethalin was greater than 80% at 56 and 70 d after planting (DAP). Other herbicides controlled swamp dodder, but crop injury was unacceptable. Carrot yield was greater where pendimethalin or s-metolachlor was applied compared to all other herbicides. Carrot mowing once 72, 86, or 100 DAP and mowing twice (72 plus 100 DAP) reduced the percentage of carrots infected with swamp dodder. Carrot infection level was least when mowed 100 DAP, and mowing did not increase yield compared to the non-treated check. These results suggest that the integration of pendimethalin for early-season swamp dodder control, followed by mowing 100 DAP, could reduce the impact of swamp dodder on carrots.

Keywords

Linurons-metolachlorpendimethalinswamp dodder, Cuscuta gronovii Willd. ex J. A. Schultescarrot, Daucus carota L.Cultural weed controlherbicidesintegrated weed managementmowingparasitism
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 408 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bewick, T. A., Binning, L. K., and Balke, N. E. 1991. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate by carrot infected by swamp dodder. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 116:1035–1039.Google Scholar
Bewick, T. A., Binning, L. K., and Dana, M. N. 1988. Post-attachment control of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and carrot (Daucus carota L.). Weed Technol 2:166–169.Google Scholar
Buddhi, , Marambe, , Siril, , Wijesundara, , Kushan, , Tennakoon, , Dhammika, , Pindeniya, , Chandana, , and Jayasinghe, . 2002. Growth and development of Cuscuta chinensis Lam. and its impact on selected crops. Weed Biol. Manage 2:79–83.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Orloff, S. B., and Reints, J. S. 1992. An integrated weed management procedure for the control of dodder (Cuscuta indecora) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol 6:603–606.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H. 1990. Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) control with dinitroaniline herbicides in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol 4:341–348.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H., Ashton, F. M., Welker, W. V., Frank, J. R., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Dodder and Its Control. New York: U.S. Department of Agriculture Farmers' Bulletin, No. 2276. 24.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. H. and Saghir, A. R. 1983. Herbicides applied to dodder (Cuscuta spp.) after attachment to alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci 31:465–471.Google Scholar
Farah, A. F. and Al-Abdusalam, M. A. 2004. Effect of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris Yuncker) on some legume crops. Sci. J. King Faisal Univ. Basic and Appl. Sci 5:103–113.Google Scholar
Fer, A. 1984. Physiological approach to the chemical control of Cuscuta: experiments with 14C-labelled herbicides. Pages 164–174. in. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds. Allepo, Syria.Google Scholar
Giannopolitis, C. N. 1978. Inhibition of seed germination and early stem elongation of Cuscuta australis by ethofumesate. Weed Res 19:95–100.Google Scholar
Hutchison, J. M. and Ashton, F. M. 1980. Germination of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Weed Sci 28:330–334.Google Scholar
Moorthy, B. T., Manish-Bhan, S., Mishra, J. S., and Dubey, R. P. 2004. Effect of different densities of Cuscuta on varieties of niger [Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.) Cass]. Indian J. of Weed Sci 36:249–252.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. 1993. Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. New York: Wallingford Oxon. 183–221.Google Scholar
SAS 2008. SAS System Version 9.1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
[USDA-NAAS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service 2007. Wisconsin Data—Vegetables. http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/ PullData_US.jsp. Accessed: January 23, 2008.Google Scholar
Weinberg, T., Lalazar, A., and Rubin, B. 2003. Effects of bleaching herbicides on field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Weed Sci 51:663–670.Google Scholar