Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:24:38.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Survey of Weeds in Various Crops in Georgia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Theodore M. Webster  and
Gregory E. Macdonald
Theodore M. Webster*
Affiliation:
Crop Protection and Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31794
Gregory E. Macdonald
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A survey of county extension agents was conducted in 1998 to determine the most troublesome weeds in corn, cotton, forages and pastures, peanut, small grains, soybean, tobacco, and vegetables in Georgia. The most troublesome weed statewide averaged over all crops was sicklepod. It was the most troublesome weed in cotton and soybean and among the four most troublesome weeds in corn, peanut, tobacco, and vegetables. Sicklepod was found in each of the nine climatological districts and in all the crops surveyed. Perennial nutsedge species were the second most troublesome weeds in Georgia. They ranked as the most troublesome weeds in tobacco and vegetables and were among the top five most troublesome weeds in corn, cotton, peanut, and soybean. Pigweed species were ranked third averaged over all the crops surveyed and were the second most troublesome weeds in cotton and vegetables and among the top five most troublesome species in corn, soybean, and tobacco. Morningglory species were listed as troublesome in six of the eight crops surveyed and ranked fourth overall. Similarly, Texas panicum was found in all districts and was the fifth most troublesome weed species. Texas panicum was the most troublesome weed in corn and among the top five most troublesome weeds in peanut, soybean, and tobacco. Florida beggarweed was the most troublesome weed in peanut, the second most troublesome weed in tobacco, and a top-10 weed species in corn, cotton, soybean, and vegetables, resulting in a ranking of sixth overall. Wild radish, large crabgrass, and tropic croton were the seventh through the ninth most troublesome weeds. Wild radish was the most troublesome weed of small grains and the sixth most troublesome weed of vegetables. Large crabgrass was the second most troublesome weed of forages and pastures and was reported in six other crops. Tropic croton was a troublesome weed in seven of the eight crops surveyed and was among the top five most troublesome weeds of cotton and peanut. The 10th most troublesome weed overall was bahiagrass, the most troublesome weed of forages and pastures.

Keywords

Bahiagrass, Paspalum notatum Fluegge # PASNOFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. # DEDTOlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. # DIGSAmorningglory species, Ipomoea sppnutsedge species, Cyperus spppigweed species, Amaranthus sppsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby # CASOBTexas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTEtropic croton, Croton glandulosus var. septentrionalis Muell.-Arg. # CVNGSwild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum L. # RAPSNcorn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrtobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.Economically important weeds, weed distributions, weed population shifts, weed surveyC, Central districtEC, East-Central districtNC, North-Central districtNE, Northeastern districtNW, Northwestern districtSC, South-Central districtSE, Southeastern districtSW, Southwestern districtSWSS, Southern Weed Science SocietyWC, West-Central district
Type
Education
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2001 , pp. 771 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address of second author: Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0500.

References

Literature Cited

Bassett, I. J. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 78. Solanum carolinense L. and Solanum rostratum L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66: 977–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldt, P. E., Rosenthal, S. S., and Srinivasan, R. 1998. Distribution of field bindweed and hedge bindweed in the USA. J. Prod. Agric. 11: 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C., Brecke, B. J., and Barbour, J. C. 1992. Wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) interference with peanut. Weed Sci. 40: 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Weed survey—southern states. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 27: 215–249.Google Scholar
Coble, H. D. 1994. Future directions and needs for weed science research. Weed Technol. 8: 410–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhillon, R. S., Singh, S., Kundra, S., and Bastra, A. S. 1993. Studies on the chemical composition and biological activity of essential oil from Cyperus rotundus Linn. Plant Growth Regul. 13: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, J. D. and Quinones, A. 1983. 1983 Survey of perennial weeds in Wisconsin. Proc. N. Central Weed Sci. Soc. 38: 53–60.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1995. Weed survey—southern states—broadleaf crops sabsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 290–305.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states—broadleaf crops sabsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51: 299–313.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1983. Weed survey: analysis and summary. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 36: 182–184.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1984. Weed survey—southern states. South. Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 37: 192–198.Google Scholar
Ervio, L. R. and Salonen, J. 1986. Changes in the Finnish weed population. Weeds Weed Control 27: 230–235.Google Scholar
Forcella, F. and Randall, J. M. 1994. Biology of bull thistle, Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Tenore. Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 29–50.Google Scholar
Gilreath, J. P. 1981. Allelopathic potential of Cyperus rotundus L. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Florida. 139 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 1999. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Web page: http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed September 1, 1999.Google Scholar
Johnson III, W. C. 1999. Interference and economic threshold of yellow nutsedge with peanut. Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 31:29.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5: 460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, R. N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-Ecosystems 7: 145–165.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1989. History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci. 4: 85–121.Google Scholar
Meissner, R., Nel, P. C., and Smith, N. S. 1982. The residual effect of Cyperus rotundus on certain crop plants. Agroplantae 14: 47–53.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1987. Intriguing world of weeds. Colonel Johnson's grass: johnsongrass. Weed Technol. 1: 112–113.Google Scholar
Murdock, E. C. 1995. Herbicide resistance: historical perspective and current situation. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. N.C. 13:3.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Reddy, G. B., and Rao, A. N. 1982. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28: 327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28: 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedy, M. J. and Kapusta, G. 1995. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron eradicate rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in corn (Zea mays) in three years. Weed Technol. 9: 748–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, L. S. and Coble, H. D. 1999. Managing purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) populations utilizing herbicide strategies and crop rotation sequences. Weed Technol. 13: 494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11: 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 177–205.Google Scholar