Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:53:30.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sumatran Fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis) Control in No-Tillage Soybean with Diclosulam Plus Halauxifen-Methyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

Guilherme B. P. Braz ,
Rubem S. Oliveira Jr. ,
Luiz Henrique S. Zobiole ,
Rogério S. Rubin ,
Christopher Voglewede ,
Jamil Constantin  and
Hudson K. Takano
Guilherme B. P. Braz*
Affiliation:
Post-Doctoral Researcher (CNPq), Agronomy Graduate Program, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá (Paraná)Brazil
Rubem S. Oliveira Jr.
Affiliation:
Professors, Agronomy Department, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá (Paraná)Brazil
Luiz Henrique S. Zobiole
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, São Paulo (São Paulo)Brazil
Rogério S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, São Paulo (São Paulo)Brazil
Christopher Voglewede
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Jamil Constantin
Affiliation:
Professors, Agronomy Department, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá (Paraná)Brazil
Hudson K. Takano*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Agronomy Graduate Program, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá (Paraná)Brazil
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due to the limited availability of selective herbicides to control Sumatran fleabane after soybean emergence, it is essential to develop new options that provide effective control prior to planting. A new herbicide formulation containing diclosulam+halauxifen-methyl was evaluated for effectiveness at two Sumatran fleabane plant heights (5 to 10 cm, and 10 to 50 cm) and for soybean selectivity when applied at 7 or 3 d before planting. Combined results from the two sites showed that diclosulam+halauxifen, applied either alone or in a tank mixture with glyphosate, and the tank mixture of diclosulam+2,4-D amine+glyphosate are effective at all rates tested to control Sumatran fleabane in preplant applications. Crop response was observed with applications 7 days before planting at only one of the sites. A rate-dependent crop response was observed for pre-plant applications performed 3 days before soybean planting. However, crop yield was not significantly affected for either timing across all rates. All rates tested of diclosulam+halauxifen in this study were considered safe to soybean.

Debido a la limitada disponibilidad de herbicidas selectivos para el control de Conyza sumatrensis después de la emergencia de la soja, es esencial desarrollar nuevas opciones que brinden un control efectivo antes de la siembra. Una nueva formulación de herbicidas que contiene diclosulam+halauxifen-methyl fue evaluada para determinar su efectividad para el control de C. sumatrensis a dos alturas de planta (5 a 10 cm y 10 a 50 cm) y su selectividad en la soja, cuando se aplicó a 7 ó 3 d antes de la siembra. Los resultados combinados de dos sitios mostraron que diclosulam+halauxifen, aplicado solo o en mezclas en tanque con glyphosate, y la mezcla en tanque de diclosulam+2,4-D amine+glyphosate son tratamientos efectivos para el control de C. sumatrensis en aplicaciones en pre-siembra. Se observó una respuesta del cultivo con aplicaciones a 7 días antes de la siembra en solamente uno de los sitios. Una respuesta del cultivo dependiente de la dosis fue observada para aplicaciones en pre-siembra realizadas 3 días antes de la siembra de la soja. Sin embargo, el rendimiento del cultivo no fue afectado significativamente por ninguno de los momentos de aplicación al promediarse todas las dosis. Todas las dosis evaluadas de diclosulam+halauxifen en este estudio fueron consideradas seguras en la soja.

Keywords

Diclosulamglyphosatehalauxifen, 4-amino-3-chloro-6-(4-chloro-2-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)pyridine-2-carboxylic acid2,4-DSumatran fleabane, Conyza sumatrensis (Retz.) E. Walkersoybean, Glycine max L. Merr.Arylpicolinate herbicideauxin mimic herbicideburndownfallow weed managementpre-plant application.
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 184 - 192
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Mark VanGessel, University of Delaware.

References

Literature Cited

Andersen, MC (1993) Diaspore morphology and seed dispersal in several wind-dispersed Asteraceae. Am J Bot 80:487–492 Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, JL, Schmitzer, PR, Robinson, AE (2014) ArylexTM mode and site of action characterization. Weed Science Society of America and Canadian Weed Science Society/Société Canadienne de Malherbologie 68:389 Google Scholar
Bhowmik, PC, Bekech, MM (1993) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed production, emergence, and distribution in no-tillage and conventional tillage corn (Zea mays). Agron Trends Agric Sci 1:67–71 Google Scholar
Constantin, J, Oliveira, RS Jr, Zobiole, LHS, Dalbosco, M, Arantes, JGZ, Alonso, DG (2009) Influência do sistema de manejo sobre o desenvolvimento e produtividade da soja. Revista Ceres 56:274–282 Google Scholar
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, Luschei, EC, Isard, DA, Shields, E, VanGessel, MJ (2009) Conyza canadensis seed ascent in the lower atmosphere. Agric For Meteorol 149:526–534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, VanGessel, MJ (2007) Temporal and spatial dynamics of long-distance Conyza canadensis seed dispersal. J Appl Ecol 44:105–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Johnson, WG (2010) Fall and spring pre-plant herbicide applications influence spring emergence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 24:11–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embrapa, Soja (2010) Tecnologias de produção de soja: Região Central do Brasil, 2011. Londrina: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMBRAPA). 247pGoogle Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, SC, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Renga, JM, Richburg, JS, Ruiz, JM, Satchivi, NM, Schmitzer, PR, Siddall, TL, Webster, JD, Weimer, MR, Whiteker, GT, Yerkes, CN (2016) The discovery of ArylexTM active and RinskorTM active: Two novel auxin herbicides. Bioorgan Med Chem 24:362–371 Google Scholar
[EFSA] European Food Safety Authority (2014) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halauxifen-methyl (XDE-729 methyl). EFSA Journal 12:1–93 Google Scholar
Ferreira, DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc Agrotec 35:1039–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, K (2009) Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and mode of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113–120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2016) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Weed Science. http://weedscience.org/. Accessed October 3, 2016Google Scholar
[IAPAR] Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (2014) Cartas Climáticas do Paraná – Precipitação. http://www.iapar.br/modules/conteudo/conteudo.php?conteudo=595. Accessed May 14, 2014Google Scholar
Koger, CH, Reddy, KN (2005) Role of absorption and translocation in the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 53:84–89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S, Sundaram, S, Armitage, L, Evans, JP, Hawkes, T, Kepinski, S, Ferro, N, Napier, RM (2014) Defining binding efficiency and specificity of auxins for SCFTIR1/AFBAux/IAA co-receptor complex formation. ACS Chem Biol 9:673–682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellendorf, TG, Young, JM, Matthews, JL, Young, BG (2013) Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol 27:463–467 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WM, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(Spec. Issue I):31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, RS Jr, Guerra, N, Osipe, JB, Franchini, LHM, Adegas, FS, Osipe, R (2013) Herbicidas registrados para uso e resultados de pesquisa. Pages 65–90 in Constantin J, Oliveira RS Jr & Oliveira Neto AM, eds. Buva: Fundamentos e recomendações para manejo. Curitiba: Omnipax CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira Neto, AM, Constantin, J, Oliveira, RS Jr, Guerra, N, Dan, HA, Alonso, DG, Blainski, E, Santos, G (2010) Estratégias de manejo de inverno e verão visando ao controle de Conyza bonariensis e Bidens pilosa . Planta Daninha 28:1107–1116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, LN, Steckel, LE, Koger, CH, Main, CL, Mueller, TC (2009) Evaluation of spring and fall burndown application timings on control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) in no-till cotton. Weed Technol 23:335–339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paula, JM, Vargas, L, Agostinetto, D, Nohatto, MA (2011) Manejo de Conyza bonariensis resistente ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha 29:217–227 Google Scholar
Procópio, SO, Pires, FR, Menezes, CCE, Barroso, ALL, Cargnelutti Filho, A, Pacheco, LP, Vieira, AB, Zanatta, JF (2009) Utilização do herbicida 2,4-D na dessecação de manejo em lavoura de soja no sistema de plantio direto. Magistra 21:187–193 Google Scholar
Santos, G, Oliveira, RS Jr, Constantin, J, Francischini, AC, Machado, MFPS, Mangolin, CA, Nakajima, JN (2014a) Conyza sumatrensis: a new weed species resistant to glyphosate in the Americas. Weed Biol Manag 14:106–114 Google Scholar
Santos, G, Oliveira, RS Jr, Constantin, J, Francischini, AC, Osipe, JB (2014b) Multiple resistance of Conyza sumatrensis to chlorimuron-ethyl and to glyphosate. Planta Daninha 32:409–416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, HK, Oliveira, RS Jr, Constantin, J, Biffe, DF, Franchini, LHM, Braz, GBP, Rios, FA, Gheno, EA, Gemelli, A (2013) Efeito da adição do 2,4-D ao glyphosate para o controle de espécies de plantas daninhas de difícil controle. R Bras Herb 12:1–13 Google Scholar
Thompson, MA, Steckel, LE, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2007) Soybean tolerance to early pre-plant applications of 2,4-D ester, 2,4-D amine, and dicamba. Weed Technol 21:882–888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Scott, BA, Johnson, QR, White-Hansen, SE (2009) Influence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) growth stage on response to glyphosate applications. Weed Technol 23:49–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, H, Walker, S (2004) Fleabane: fleabane biology and control. http://www.weeds.crc.org.au/documents/fleabane.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2015Google Scholar