Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:04:50.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulfonylurea-Resistant Russian Thistle (Salsola iberica) Survey in Washington State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George P. Stallings ,
Donald C. Thill  and
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
George P. Stallings
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Ent. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Ent. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Ent. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The repeated use of sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides to control broadleaf weeds in wheat fields and right-of-ways has selected for herbicide-resistant Russian thistle populations. A survey was conducted in 1991 and 1992 to ascertain the relative occurrence of SU-resistant Russian thistle in eastern Washington state. The 55 574 km2 survey area was divided into 149 equal sample areas. All sample areas were surveyed for Russian thistle and seed was collected from plants in 86 sample areas. No Russian thistle was found in the center of the remaining 63 sample areas. Seeds were collected, by plant, from 30 plants at each site. Site samples were tested in the greenhouse for resistance or susceptibility to chlorsulfuron. Populations that were either homogeneous or heterogeneous for chlorsulfuron-resistance were found in 70% of the sample areas and all of the plants were susceptible in 30% of the sample areas.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]-benzenesulfonamideRussian thistle, Salsola iberica Sennen & Pau # SASKRwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Herbicide resistancechlorsulfuronSASKR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 258 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992. Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1992. Monitoring the occurrence of sulfonylurea-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Competitiveness of weeds. P. 119–187 in Weed-Crop Ecology: Principles in Weed Management. Breton Publishers, North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
4. Allen, E. B. 1982. Water and nutrient competition between Salsola kali and two native grass species (Agropyron smithii and Bouteloua gracilis). Ecology 63:732–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Crompton, C. W. and Bassett, I. J. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 65. Salsola pestifer A. Nels. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:379–388.Google Scholar
7. Crop Protection and Chemicals Reference. 7th Ed. 1991. John Wiley and Sons, New York, and Chem. and Pharm. Publ. Corp. Google Scholar
8. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1982. Russian thistle and barbwire Russian thistle seed and seedbed ecology. U.S.D.A. Agric. Res. Serv., Agric. Res. Results ARR-25. 40 p.Google Scholar
9. Evans, R. A. and Young, J. A. 1972. Germination and establishment of Salsola in relation to seedbed environment. II. Seed distribution, germination and seedling growth of Salsola and microenvironment monitoring of the seedbed. Agron. J. 64:219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Fay, P. K., Mulugeta, D. M., and Dyer, W. E. 1992. The role of seed dispersal in the spread of sulfonylurea resistant Kochia scoparia . Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 32:49.Google Scholar
11. Fowler, J. L. and Hageman, J. H. 1979. Russian thistle, a potential forage for arid lands. P. 430–443 in Arid Land Plant Resources. International Center for Arid and Semi-arid Land Studies, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, TX.Google Scholar
12. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1981. Response of small grain cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 29:414–420.Google Scholar
13. Hasslen, D. A. and McCall, J., Washington Agricultural Statistics Service. 1988. Washington Agricultural Statistics. State of Wash. Dep. of Agric. and U.S. Dep. of Agric., Nat. Agric. Stats. Serv. 56 p.Google Scholar
14. Lass, L. W. and Callihan, R. H. 1993. GPS and GIS for weed surveys and management. Weed Technol. 7:249–254.Google Scholar
15. Levin, D. A. and Kerster, H. W. 1974. Gene flow in seed plants. Evol. Biol. 7:139–220.Google Scholar
16. Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4:163–168.Google Scholar
17. Maxwell, B. D., Roush, M. L., and Radosevich, S. R. 1990. Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations. Weed Technol. 4:2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169–172.Google Scholar
19. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Plant growth and interference. P. 93–138 in Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
20. Saari, L., Cotterman, J. C., Smith, W. F., and Primiani, M. M. 1992. Sulfonylurea resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42:110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Mechanisms of resistance for ALS-inhibitor herbicides. P. 000 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J. A., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Ecology and Mechanisms. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. (In Press).Google Scholar
22. Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Primiani, M. M., and Saladini, J. L. 1990. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistant weeds: Discovery, distribution, biology, mechanism, and management. P. 115–128 in Casely, J., ed., Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
23. Thomas, A. G. and Wise, R. F. 1983. Weed Surveys of Saskatchewan Cereals and Oilseed Crops from 1976 to 1979. Weed Survey Series Pub. 83–6. Agric. Can., Regina, SK. 260 p.Google Scholar
24. Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:34–43.Google Scholar
25. Thompson, C. R. 1993. Biology of sulfonylurea-resistant and susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Ph.D. Dissertation. Univ. Idaho. 83 p.Google Scholar
26. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. 1976. Selected Weeds of the United States. Agric. Handb. No. 366:138–139.Google Scholar
27. Young, F. L. 1986. Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) growth and development in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:901–905.Google Scholar
28. Young, F. L. and Gealy, D. R. 1986. Control of Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) with chlorsulfuron in a wheat (Triticum aestivum) summer-fallow rotation. Weed Sci. 34:318–324.Google Scholar
29. Young, F. L. and Morrow, L. A. 1984. Effect of small grains and crop canopy removal on Russian thistle growth and development. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 37:164–165.Google Scholar
30. Young, F. L. and Whitesides, R. E. 1987. Efficacy of postharvest herbicides on Russian thistle (Salsola iberica) control and seed germination. Weed Sci. 35:554–559.Google Scholar
31. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1972. Germination and establishment of Salsola in relation to seedbed environment. I. Temperature, afterripening, moisture relations of Salsola seeds as determined by laboratory studies. Agron. J. 64:214–218.Google Scholar