Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:24:01.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Soybean (Glycine max) Seed Quality and Harvesting Efficiency as Affected by Low Weed Densities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
William L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Kumiai Mississippi Research Station, Kumiai Chemical Industry Company, LTD., 2830 Wilcox Road, Leland, MS 38756

Abstract

With the shift to earlier maturing soybean cultivars, harvest interference data are needed at low weed densities that will not reduce yield, but may affect soybean quality or harvesting efficiency. Field experiments were conducted in 1995 and 1996 to determine the density of five weeds necessary to warrant desiccation treatments. There were no consistent differences in losses of harvestable soybean due to weed density. Common cocklebur increased foreign material and soybean moisture at a greater rate than did hemp sesbania, ivyleaf morningglory, or redroot pigweed, with sicklepod intermediate among these species. Soybean test weight was reduced by 17, 13, and 59 g/L for each plant/meter of row with redroot pigweed, sicklepod, and common cocklebur, respectively, whereas hemp sesbania and ivyleaf morningglory did not affect test weight. However, all species evaluated increased damaged soybean seeds by 8.2 to 11.1% for each plant/meter of row. Combine speed was not affected substantially by the weed densities evaluated.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J. M., and McWhorter, C. G. 1976. The economics of common cocklebur control in soybean production. Weed Sci. 24:397400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitzer, M. J., Grabau, L. J., and Kane, M. M. 1993. Planting date influence on early maturing soybean. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the Southern Soybean Conference. St. Louis, MO: American Soybean Assoc. pp. 186187.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>) with soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>). Weed Sci. 30:507513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, G. R., Nelson, L. R., and Finch, G. A. III. 1989. A Drought-Avoiding Soybean Production System for Northeast Texas. College Station. TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Stn. MP-1680. 4 p.Google Scholar
Buehring, N. W., Hancock, F. G., Roberts, G. M., and Reginelli, D. B. 1994. Early maturity soybeans in Mississippi. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the Southern Soybean Conference. St. Louis, MO: American Soybean Assoc. pp. 115122.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., 1973. Influence of weeds on soybean harvesting losses with a combine. Weed Sci. 21:520523.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., Warnes, D. D., Somerhalder, B. R., and Weeks, S. A. 1969. Effect of weeds on harvesting efficiency in corn, sorghum, and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:438441.Google Scholar
Cordes, R. C., and Bauman, T. T. 1984. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 32:364370.Google Scholar
Costello, R. W., and Oliver, L. R. 1995. Influence of planting date on Group IV soybean weed management. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:64.Google Scholar
Gabe, H. L., 1994. Indeterminate short season soybeans for the South: some breeding and agronomic considerations. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the Southern Soybean Conference. pp. 125130.Google Scholar
Green, D. E., Cavanah, L. E., and Pinnell, E. L. 1966. Effect of seed moisture content, field weathering, and combine cylinder speed on soybean seed quality. Crop Sci. 6:710.Google Scholar
Henry, W. T., and Bauman, T. T. 1989. Interference between soybeans (<i>Glycine max</i>) and common cocklebur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37:753760.Google Scholar
May, M. L., Caviness, C. E., and Eldridge, I. L. 1989. Soybean response to early planting in northeast Arkansas. Ark. Farm Res. 38:15.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., and Anderson, J. M. 1976a. Effectiveness of metribuzin applied preemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:385390.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., and Anderson, J. M. 1976b. Bentazon applied postemergence for economical control common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:391396.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (<i>Sesbania exaltata</i>) competition in soybeans (<i>Glycine max</i>). Weed Sci. 27:5864.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., and Anderson, J. M. 1993. Effects of johnsongrass (<i>Sorghum halepense</i>), hemp sesbania (<i>Sesbania exaltata</i>), and delayed harvest on soybeans. Weed Technol. 7:355360.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G., and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:5659.Google Scholar
Monks, D. W., and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Interactions between soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36:770774.Google Scholar
Nave, W. R., and Wax, L. M. 1971. Effect of weeds on soybean yield and harvesting efficiency. Weed Sci. 19:533535.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., 1993. Weed control concerns and cost effective strategies. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the Southern Soybean Conference. pp. 129133.Google Scholar
Rabb, J. L., and Ryan, S. M. 1993. Cultural practices for early maturing soybean production. <i>In</i> Proceedings of the Southern Soybean Conference. pp. 124128.Google Scholar
Shurtleff, J. L., and Coble, H. D. 1985. Interference of certain broadleaf weed species in soybeans (<i>Glycine max</i>). Weed Sci. 33:654657.Google Scholar
Thurlow, D. L., and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar