Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:04:10.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) Response to Simulated Drift from Selected Sulfonylurea Herbicides, Dicamba, Glyphosate, and Glufosinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib  and
Dallas Peterson
Kassim Al-Khatib*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Dallas Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research was conducted to evaluate the response of soybean to various herbicides applied at rates to simulate drift damage. Dicamba, glyphosate, glufosinate, and the sulfonylurea herbicides CGA-152005, primisulfuron, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron, and CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron were applied to soybean at the two to three trifoliolate leaf stage in 1997 and 1998 at and ⅓ of the recommended use rates. The order of yield reduction after herbicide treatment was CGA-152005 > dicamba > CGA-152005 plus primisulfuron > rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron > primisulfuron. Soybean yields were not reduced by glyphosate, glufosinate, and nicosulfuron. Applications of all herbicides at rates higher than of the use rate caused injury symptoms within 30 d after treatment. However, soybean plants had partially or fully recovered by the end of the growing season. Therefore, early-season injury symptoms from herbicide drift are not reliable indicators for soybean yield reduction.

Keywords

Dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglufosinate, 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinenicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamideprimisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidCGA-152005 (proposed common name, prosulfuron), 1-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-triazin-2-yl)-3-[2-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)-phenylsulfonyl]-urearimsulfuron, N-[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-3-(ethylsulfonyl)-2-pyridinesulfonamidethifensulfuron, 3-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-2-thiophenecarboxylic acidsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.CGA-152005nicosulfuronprimisulfuronrimsulfuronthifensulfuronDAT, days after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 264 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution 99-206-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Auch, D. E. and Arnold, W. E. 1978. Dicamba use and injury on soybean (Glycine max) in South Dakota. Weed Sci. 26:471–475.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. A. and Kapusta, G. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to simulated drift of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:740–745.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. and Lueschen, W. E. 1979. Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci. 27:486–493.Google Scholar
Beyer, E. M. Jr., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Sulfonylurea. In Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Bode, L. E. 1987. Spray application technology. In Methods of Applying Herbicides, McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R., eds. Weed Science Society of America Monograph 4. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 85–110.Google Scholar
Fribourg, H. A. and Johnson, I. J. 1955. Response of soybean strains to 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Agron. J. 47:171–174.Google Scholar
Maybank, J., Yoshida, K., and Grover, R. 1978. Spray drift from agricultural pesticide applications. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. J. 28:1009–1014.Google Scholar
Miller, P.C.H. 1993. Spray drift and its measurement. In Mathews, G. A. and Hislop, E. C., eds. Application Technology for Crop Protection, Wallingford, UK: Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux International. pp. 101–122.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1965. Effect of chlorophenoxy herbicides on soybeans. Weeds 13:168–169.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M., Knuth, L. A., and Slife, F. W. 1969. Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:388–393.Google Scholar
Weidenhamer, J. D., Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Sobotka, F. E. 1989. Dicamba injury to soybean. Agron. J. 81:637–643.Google Scholar