Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:50:46.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivar Response to Fluchloralin, Metribuzin, and Vernolate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

M. Daniel Martin ,
James P. Worthington  and
Elmer Gray
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1983 and 1984, 20 commercial soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars were field tested for their response to fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine], metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-l,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one], and vernoiate [S-propyl dipropylcarbamothioate]. Recommended rates for the herbicides were 1.1, 0.4, and 2.8 kg ai/ha, respectively. Each herbicide was applied at recommended (lx), 2x, and 4x rates in both years with an 8x rate added in 1984. Plant height, vigor, and injury were used to determine herbicide effects. Differences existed among cultivars, herbicides, and rates. Increased herbicide rates generally resulted in reduced plant height and vigor and increased plant injury. Cultivars tolerant to the three herbicides included Cumberland, Essex, FFR 560, NAPB 420, and Pixie.

Keywords

Glycine maxchemical injurycultivar-by-herbicide interactionherbicidesphototoxicityvegetative growth.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , October 1987 , pp. 282 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Coble, H. D., and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.Google Scholar
2. Faulkner, J. S. 1982. Breeding herbicide tolerant crop cultivars by conventional methods. Pages 235–254 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, Jonathon (ed.). Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
3. Gossett, B. J., Morgan, L. F., and Murphy, T. R. 1982. Soybean plant damage and yields as affected by metribuzin and seed quality. Agron. J. 74:691–693.Google Scholar
4. Hartwig, E. E., Barrentine, W. L., and Edwards, C. J. Jr. 1980. Registration of Tracy-M soybeans. Crop Sci. 20:825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Johnson, B. J. 1974. Response of weeds and soybeans to vernolate and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:372–377.Google Scholar
6. Marquis, L. Y., Shimabukuro, R. H., Stolzenberg, G. E., Feil, V. J., and Zaylskie, R. G. 1979. Metabolism and selectivity of fluchloralin in soybean roots. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:1148–1156.Google Scholar
7. Moshier, L. J., and Russ, O. G. 1981. Metribuzin injury in soybeans as influenced by application timing and cultivation. Agron. J. 73:677–679.Google Scholar
8. Parker, M. B., and Dowler, C. C. 1976. Effects of nitrogen with trifluralin and vernolate on soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:131–133.Google Scholar
9. Smith, A. E., and Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 32:253–257.Google Scholar
10. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, a Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.Google Scholar
11. Wax, L. M. 1973. Weed control. Pages 219–224 in Caldwell, B. E. (ed.) Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
12. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agroa J. 68:484–486.Google Scholar
13. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar