Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:10:42.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil Solarization Controls Broomrapes (Orobanche spp.) in Host Vegetable Crops in the Jordan Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. E. Abu-Irmaileh
B. E. Abu-Irmaileh*
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Protection. Univ. of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effectiveness of soil solarization with black (BPE) and clear polyethylene mulches (CPE), 0.04 and 0.06 mm thick, respectively, was tested during the 1986 to 1990 growing seasons for controlling Egyptian broomrape, hemp broomrape and nodding broomrape in heavily infested fields. Solarization for 6 wk reduced or eliminated broomrape infestation and improved crop yields. The CPE started to show splitting and deterioration after 4 to 5 wk of solarization. The BPE lasted in usable conditions throughout the growing season. Deep soil tillage with the hand hoe, after solarization, caused broomrape to reappear. Crops grew best in plots after solarization with BPE if they were planted through the same mulch after it was perforated. Soil solarization with BPE or CPE in large tomato field trials, completely eliminated both nodding and hemp broomrapes during the growing season. However, greenhouse pot experiments indicated that solarization significantly reduced weed seedling numbers, but did not significantly reduce the dry weights of the broomrape plants that emerged in the soil samples taken from solarized plots.

Keywords

Egyptian broomrape, Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers., nodding broomrape, O. cernua Loeffl. ♯ ORACEhemp broomrape, O. ramosa L. ♯ ORARA, tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill ‘Claudia Raf’Vicia fabalocal typeCucurbita pepo L. var. Cf. ‘Regina FL.’parasitic weeds
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 575 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abu-Irmaileh, B. E. 1979. Occurrence of parasitic flowering plants in Jordan. Plant Dis. Rep. 63:1025–1028.Google Scholar
2. Al-Kalaielah, R. A. 1988. Effect of soil solarization using different thicknesses of transparent polyethylene on cucumber grown in plastic houses in the Jordan Valley. MSc. thesis. Univ. of Jordan-Amman. 118 p.Google Scholar
3. Al-Raddad, A. M. 1979. Soil disinfestation by plastic tarping. MSc. thesis. Univ. of Jordan-Amman. 95 p.Google Scholar
4. Barakat, R. M. 1987. Comparative effect of different colors of polyethylene tarping on soilborne pathogens. MSc. thesis. Univ. of Jordan-Amman. 82 p.Google Scholar
5. Braun, M. 1987. Solarization for sanitation-Possibilities and limitations, based on experiments in southern Germany and Sudan. Gesunde Pflanzen (Germany, F.R.). 39:301–309.Google Scholar
6. Brighton, G. A. 1972. Degradation and disposability of plastics. “Plastics in Agriculture” Vol. 1:203–208. Fifth International Colloquium. Budapest. June 1972.Google Scholar
7. Chen, Y., and Katan, J. 1980. Effect of solar heating of soils by transparent polyethylene mulching on their chemical properties. Soil Sci. 130:271–277.Google Scholar
8. Dweik, N., and Abu-Irmaileh, B. E. 1984. Competitive effect and control of annual weeds in three major vegetable crops grown in the East Jordan Valley. Dirasat 11:57–64.Google Scholar
9. Grooshevoy, S. E. 1939. Disinfestation of seed-bed soil in cold frames by solar energy. The A. I. Mikoyan Pan-Soviet Sci. Res. Inst. Too. and Indian Tob. Ind. (VITIM). Krasnodar, Publ. 137. pp. 51–56. 1939. (English summary). In The Review of Applied Mycology Vol. 18. p. 635. The Imperial Mycological Institute. Kew. 1939.Google Scholar
10. Horowitz, M., Roger, Y., and Herlinger, G. 1983. Solarization for weed control. Weed Sci. 31:170–179.Google Scholar
11. Jackson, M. J. 1960. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 498 p.Google Scholar
12. Jacobsohn, R., Greenberger, A., Katan, J., Levi, M., and Alon, H. 1980. Control of Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca) and other weeds by means of solar heating of the soil by polyethylene mulching. Weed Sci. 28:312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Katan, J., Greenberger, A., Alon, H., and Agrinstein, . 1976. Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for the control of diseases caused by soilborne pathogens. Phytopathology 66:683–688.Google Scholar
14. Morsi, M. A., and Al-Merabe', A. I. 1960. Vegetable crops. Vol. 2. Vegetable crop production. 2nd ed. The Anglo Egyptian Library, Cairo. 715 p. (In Arabic).Google Scholar
15. Overman, A. J., and Jones, J. P. 1969. Effect of polyethylene mulch on yields of tomato infested with root-knot nematodes. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. 28:258–262. (Abstracted in Biol. Abstr., 1970. 51:6349).Google Scholar
16. Rubin, B., and Benjamin, A. 1984. Solar heating of the soil: Involvement of environmental factors in the weed control process. Weed Sci. 32:138–142.Google Scholar
17. Sauerborn, J., and Saxena, M. C. 1987. Effect of soil solarization on Orobanche spp. infestation and other pests in faba beans and lentil. p. 733–744. in Weber, H. Chr. and Forstreuter, W., eds. Parasitic Flowering Plants. (Proc. 4th ISPFP, Marburg, West Germany).Google Scholar
18. Standifer, L. C., Wilson, P. W., and Porche-Sorbet, R. 1984. Effects of solarization on soil weed seed populations. Weed Sci. 32:569–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Takano, T., and Kawazoe, F. 1976. Effects of plastic mulching on responses of tomato plant and soil environment. Sci. Rep. Fac. Agric. Meijo Univ. 12:8–16. (Abstracted in Biol. Abst., 1977. 63 38505).Google Scholar
20. Wilcox, G. E., Martin, G. C., and Langston, R. 1962. Root zone temperature and phosphorous treatment effects on tomato seedling growth in soil and nutrient solutions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 80: 522–529.Google Scholar