Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T12:56:01.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sesame Tolerance to Preplant Applications of 2,4-D and Dicamba

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2017

Benjamin P. Sperry ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Ramon G. Leon ,
Diane L. Rowland ,
Michael J. Mulvaney  and
Jose Luiz C. S. Dias
Benjamin P. Sperry
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Professor, and Graduate Student, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Jason A. Ferrell*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Professor, and Graduate Student, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
Assistant Professors, University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, 4253 Experiment Rd., Hwy. 182, Jay, FL 32565
Diane L. Rowland
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Professor, and Graduate Student, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
Michael J. Mulvaney
Affiliation:
Assistant Professors, University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, 4253 Experiment Rd., Hwy. 182, Jay, FL 32565
Jose Luiz C. S. Dias
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Professor, Professor, and Graduate Student, Agronomy Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two separate experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016 in Citra, FL to investigate the effects of preplant application timing of 2,4-D and dicamba on sesame stand and yield. Nonlinear regression analysis was performed to determine the application timing that caused 10% stand or yield reduction (GR10) compared to the nontreated control (NTC) and expressed as d before planting (DBP; longer intervals indicate more injury). Likewise, regression analysis was used to determine sesame stand that resulted in 10% yield reduction (YR10) expressed as plants m−1 row. Stand measured 3 wk after planting (WAP) revealed 2,4-D applied at 0.53 kg ae ha−1 to be the least injurious treatment to sesame stand (GR10=6.4 DBP). Conversely, dicamba at 1.12 kg ha−1 produced a GR10 of 15.7 DBP for sesame stand at 3 WAP. 2,4-D applied at 0.53 and 1.06 kg ha−1 and dicamba applied at 0.56 kg ha−1 had the lowest GR10 for yield of 2, 3.7, and 3 DBP, respectively. Dicamba applied at 1.12 kg ha−1 proved to be the most injurious treatment to yield, which produced a GR10 value of 10.3 DBP. To simulate possible stand losses associated with dicamba or 2,4-D and the subsequent effect on yield, a separate experiment was conducted in which sesame was thinned to various plant densities and yield was recorded to determine the relationship between plant stand and seed yield. The regression analysis of these data was then compared to that of the experiment treated with 2,4-D and dicamba to separate any physiological effects of the herbicides that would lead to yield reduction from yield effects due to stand loss only. Rate constants were compared and no statistical differences were detected between herbicide and non-herbicide treatments, suggesting that yield reductions that occur from preplant applications of 2,4-D and dicamba were purely due to stand reductions.

Keywords

2,4-Ddicambasesame, Sesamum indicum L.Crop injuryburndownpreplant.
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 590 - 598
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Michael Walsh, University of Sydney

References

Literature Cited

Altom, JD, Stritzke, JF (1973) Degradation of dicamba, picloram, and four phenoxy herbicides in soils. Weed Sci 21:556–560 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2004) Weedar 64 herbicide product label. Nufarm Publication No. RV031915. Alsip, IL: Nufarm Inc. 18 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2010) Clarity herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2010-04-065-0154. Research Triangle Park, NC: BASF Corporation. 22 pGoogle Scholar
Bednarz, CW, Shurley, DW, Anthony, SW, Nichols, RL (2005) Yield, quality, and profitability of cotton produced at varying plant densities. Agron J 97:235–240 Google Scholar
Brown, SM, Whitwell, T (1985) Weed control programs for minimum-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 33:843–847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, JA, Kells, JJ (1990) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 4:642–647 Google Scholar
Caliskan, S, Arslan, M, Arioglu, H, Isler, N (2004) Effect of planting methods and plant population on growth and yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in a mediterranean type of environment. Asian J Plant Sci 3(5), 610–613 Google Scholar
Carpenter, AC, Board, JE (1997) Branch yield components controlling soybean yield stability across plant populations. Crop Sci 37:885–891 Google Scholar
Conley, SP, Abendroth, L, Elmore, R, Christmas, EP, Zarnstorff, M (2008) Soybean seed yield and composition response to stand reduction at vegetative and reproductive stages. Agron J 100:1666–1669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Carlson, DS, York, AC (2005) Pre-plant control of cutleaf evening primrose (Oenothera laciniata Hill) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Cotton Sci 9:223–228 Google Scholar
Delgado, M, Yermanos, DM (1975) Yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under different population densities. Econ Bot 29:69–78 Google Scholar
El Naim, AM, El day, EM, Ahmed, AA (2010) Effect of plant density on the performance of some sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars under rain fed. Res J Agr Biol Sci 6:498–504 Google Scholar
Eubank, TW, Poston, DH, Nandula, VK, Koger, CH, Shaw, DR, Reynolds, DB (2008) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control using glyphosate-, paraquat-, and glufosinate-based herbicide programs. Weed Technol 22:16–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everitt, JD, Keeling, JW (2007) Weed control and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to preplant applications of dicamba, 2,4-D, and diflufenzopyr plus dicamba. Weed Technol 21:506–510 Google Scholar
Everitt, JD, Keeling, JW (2009) Cotton growth and yield response to simulated 2,4-D and dicamba drift. Weed Technol 23:503–506 Google Scholar
Florida Automated Weather Network (2016) Gainesville, FL: FAWN: Florida Automated Weather Network, University of Florida. http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/. Accessed October 20, 2016Google Scholar
Grover, R (1977) Mobility of dicamba, picloram and 2,4-D in soil columns. Weed Sci 25:159–162 Google Scholar
Hicks, DR, Lueschen, WE, Ford, JH (1990) Effect of stand density and thinning on soybean. J Prod Agric 3:587–590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK (2009) Soybean canopy and tillage effects on emergence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from a natural seed bank. Weed Sci 57:644–651 Google Scholar
Johnson, VA, Fisher, LR, Jordan, DL, Edmisten, KE, Stewart, AM, York, AC (2012) Cotton, peanut, and soybean response to sublethal rates of dicamba, glufosinate, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 26:195–206 Google Scholar
Johnson, WC, Baldwin, JA, Mullinix, BG (2000) Winter fallow management of volunteer peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and cutleaf evening primrose (Oenothera laciniata Hill). Peanut Sci 27:67–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeling, JW, Henniger, CG, Abernathy, JR (1989) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 3:399–401 Google Scholar
Keeling, W, Segarra, E, Abernathy, JR (1989) Evaluation of conservation tillage cropping systems for cotton on the Texas southern high plains. J Prod Agric 2:269–273 Google Scholar
Krausz, RF, Kapusta, G, Mathews, JL (1993) Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to 2,4-D ester applied preplant. Weed Technol 7:906–910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langham, DR, Riney, J, Smith, G, Wiemers, T (2008) Sesame Harvest Guide. Austin, TX: Sesaco Corporation. http://www.sesaco.com/Websites/sesaco/images/Harvest_pamphlet_080903_final_b.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2016Google Scholar
Langham, DR, Wiemers, T, Janick, J, Whipkey, A (2002). Progress in mechanizing sesame in the US through breeding. Pages 157–173 in Trends in New Crops and New Uses: Proceedings of the Fifth National Symposium. Atlanta, Georgia: ASHS PressGoogle Scholar
Lyon, DJ, Wilson, RG (1986) Sensitivity of field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to reduced rates of 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Sci 34:953–956 Google Scholar
Marple, ME, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2008) Cotton injury and yield as affected by simulated drift of 2,4-D and dicamba. Weed Technol 22:609–614 Google Scholar
Moyer, JR, Bergen, P, Schaalje, GB (1992) Effect of 2,4-D and dicamba residues on following crops in conservation tillage systems. Weed Technol 6:149–155 Google Scholar
Nayar, NM, Mehra, KL (1970) Sesame: its uses, botany, cytogenetics, and origin. Econ Bot 24:20–31 Google Scholar
Noorka, IR, Hafiz, SI, El-bramawy, MAS (2011) Response of sesame to population densities and nitrogen fertilization on newly reclaimed sandy soils. Pak J Bot 43:1953–1958 Google Scholar
Prostko, EP, Grey, TL, Johnson, WC 3rd, Jordan, DL, Grichar, WJ, Besler, BA, Brewer, KD, Eastin, EF (2003) Influence of preplant applications of 2,4-D, dicamba, tribenuron, and tribenuron plus thifensulfuron on peanut. Peanut Sci 30:18–22 Google Scholar
Reynolds, D, Crawford, S, Jordan, D (2000) Cutleaf evening primrose control with preplant burndown herbicide combinations in cotton. J Cotton Sci 4:124–129 Google Scholar
Roy, N, Mamun, SMA, Jahan, MdS (2009) Yield performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties at varying levels of row spacing. Res J Agr Bio Sci 5:823–827 Google Scholar
Schroeder, J (1989) Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) control in soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 37:112–116 Google Scholar
Shaw, DR (1996) Development of stale seedbed weed control programs for southern row crops. Weed Sci 44:413–416 Google Scholar
Sperry, BP, Ferrell, JA, Leon, RG, Rowland, DL, Mulvaney, MJ (2016) Influence of planting depth and application timing on S-metolachlor injury in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Weed Technol 30:958–964 Google Scholar
Thompson, MA, Steckel, LE, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2007) Soybean tolerance to early preplant applications of 2,4-D ester, 2,4-D amine, and dicamba. Weed Technol 21:882–885 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax, LM, Knuth, LA, Slife, FW (1969) Response of soybeans to 2,4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci 17:388–393 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2013) Weed survey – southern states: broadleaf crops sub-section. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 66:275–287Google Scholar
Webster, TM, MacDonald, GE (2001) A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol 15:771–790 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Nichols, RL (2012) Changes in the prevalence of weed species in the major agronomic crops of the southern United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci 60:145–157 Google Scholar
White, RH, Worsham, AD (1990) Control of legume cover crops in no till corn (Zea mays) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 4:57–62 Google Scholar
Wilson, JS, Worsham, AD (1988) Combination of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn, Zea mays, and soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Sci 36:648–652 Google Scholar
York, AC, Culpepper, AS, Stewart, AM (2004) Response of strip-tilled cotton to preplant applications of dicamba and 2,4-D. J Cotton Sci 8:213–222 Google Scholar